The configuration of the Brazilian scientific field.

This article describes the configuration of the scientific field in Brazil, characterizing the scientific communities in every major area of knowledge in terms of installed capacity, ability to train new researchers, and capacity for academic production. Empirical data from several sources of information are used to characterize the different communities. Articulating the theoretical contributions of Pierre Bourdieu, Ludwik Fleck, and Thomas Kuhn, the following types of capital are analyzed for each community: social capital (scientific prestige), symbolic capital (dominant paradigm), political capital (leadership in S & T policy), and economic capital (resources). Scientific prestige is analyzed by taking into account the volume of production, activity index, citations, and other indicators. To characterize symbolic capital, the dominant paradigms that distinguish the natural sciences, the humanities, applied sciences, and technology development are analyzed theoretically. Political capital is measured by presidency in one of the main agencies in the S & T national system, and research resources and fellowships define the economic capital. The article discusses the composition of these different types of capital and their correspondence to structural capacities in various communities with the aim of describing the configuration of the Brazilian scientific field.

[1]  Ludwik Fleck,et al.  La génesis y el desarrollo de un hecho científico: introducción a la teoría del estilo de pensamiento y del colectivo de pensamiento , 1986 .

[2]  D. Serwer.  Science in Brazil. , 1992, Science.

[3]  M. Chaui,et al.  Convite à filosofia , 2000 .

[4]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Science in Brazil. Part 2: Sectoral and institutional research profiles , 2006, Scientometrics.

[5]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Science in Brazil. Part 1: A macro-level comparative study , 2006, Scientometrics.

[6]  Erin E Leahey,et al.  Not by Productivity Alone: How Visibility and Specialization Contribute to Academic Earnings , 2007 .

[7]  Jacqueline Leta,et al.  Researchers' writing competence: a bottleneck in the publication of Latin‐American science? , 2008, EMBO reports.

[8]  M. Hermes-Lima,et al.  Perceptions of Latin American scientists about science and post-graduate education: Introduction to the 5th issue of CBP-Latin America. , 2008, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology.

[9]  Goio Etxebarria,et al.  Use of Scopus and Google Scholar to measure social sciences production in four major Spanish universities , 2009, Scientometrics.

[10]  Christopher King,et al.  Brazilian Science on the Rise , 2009 .

[11]  Ronaldo Mota.  Editorial: innovation in society and the basic sciences in the 4th NCSTI - National conference on science,technology and innovation , 2010 .

[12]  A. Regalado,et al.  Brazilian Science: Riding a Gusher , 2010 .

[13]  F. E. C. Y. Tecnología.  Manual de Frascati , 2010 .

[14]  Afrânio Garcia.  Mobilité Universitaire et Circulation Internationale des Idées. Le Cas du Brésil Contemporain , 2011 .

[15]  Almeida Filho,et al.  O que é saúde , 2011 .

[16]  Rogério Mugnaini,et al.  A new indicator for international visibility: exploring Brazilian scientific community , 2011, Scientometrics.

[17]  Thomas Kuhn,et al.  A Estrutura das Revoluções Científicas , 2011 .

[18]  Científicas De Thomas Kuhn.  KUHN, Thomas S. A estrutura das revoluções científicas. 5. ed. São Paulo: Editora Perspectiva S.A, 1997. , 2012 .