Reduction of misleading ("false") positive results in mammalian cell genotoxicity assays. III: sensitivity of human cell types to known genotoxic agents.

We have demonstrated previously that the seemingly high rate of "false" or "misleading" positive results from in vitro micronucleus assays (MNvit) was greater when rodent derived cell lines and certain toxicity measures, such as relative cell count or replication index, were used. These studies suggested that the use of a human cell type with functional p53 and a toxicity measure that included a function of cell proliferation could dramatically reduce the detection of misleading positive results. A reduced "false positive rate" should not be at the expense of a loss of sensitivity of the assay. Therefore, we have investigated the sensitivity of the MNvit assay to known genotoxic agents using three cell types shown previously to be less prone to misleading positives, namely human lymphocytes (HuLy), TK6 and HepG2 cells. The 17 chemicals are well characterised and are from a list of chemicals known to produce positive results in in vitro mammalian cell assays. These data demonstrated a high sensitivity of the assay in which TK6 and HuLy cells were employed, such that 15 out of the 17 chemicals were correctly identified. By contrast, the use of HepG2 cells resulted in far fewer than expected positive responses. In conclusion, using TK6 and HuLy cells in preference to long established rodent cell lines in order to improve specificity does not compromise the sensitivity of the MNvit to detect known genotoxic agents.

[1]  Raffaella Corvi,et al.  Recommended lists of genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals for assessment of the performance of new or improved genotoxicity tests: a follow-up to an ECVAM workshop. , 2008, Mutation research.

[2]  V. Mersch-Sundermann,et al.  Use of human-derived liver cell lines for the detection of environmental and dietary genotoxicants; current state of knowledge. , 2004, Toxicology.

[3]  N. Osheroff,et al.  Mechanism of action of eukaryotic topoisomerase II and drugs targeted to the enzyme. , 1998, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[4]  Katie Smith,et al.  Reduction of misleading ("false") positive results in mammalian cell genotoxicity assays. I. Choice of cell type. , 2012, Mutation research.

[5]  David Brusick,et al.  Genotoxicity under extreme culture conditions , 1991 .

[6]  TG 442D.  OECD GUIDELINE FOR THE TESTING OF CHEMICALS In Vitro Skin Sensitisation: ARE-Nrf2 Luciferase Test Method , 2000 .

[7]  Raffaella Corvi,et al.  How to reduce false positive results when undertaking in vitro genotoxicity testing and thus avoid unnecessary follow-up animal tests: Report of an ECVAM Workshop. , 2007, Mutation research.

[8]  Eian D Massey,et al.  2-Aminoanthracene, diethylstilboestrol and vinblastine tested in the in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test at British American Tobacco UK in support of the OECD draft Test Guideline 487. , 2010, Mutation research.

[9]  M. Chagnon,et al.  2,4-Diaminotoluene (2,4-DAT)-induced DNA damage, DNA repair and micronucleus formation in the human hepatoma cell line HepG2. , 2005, Toxicology.

[10]  A. Elhajouji,et al.  In vitro genotoxicity test approaches with better predictivity: summary of an IWGT workshop. , 2011, Mutation research.

[11]  A. Natarajan,et al.  Use of human hepatoma cells for in vitro metabolic activation of chemical mutagens/carcinogens. , 1991, Mutagenesis.

[12]  B. Ames,et al.  Ascorbate is an outstanding antioxidant in human blood plasma. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  U. Luderer,et al.  Induction of Apoptosis by 9,10-Dimethyl-1,2-Benzanthracene in Cultured Preovulatory Rat Follicles Is Preceded by a Rise in Reactive Oxygen Species and Is Prevented by Glutathione1 , 2007, Biology of reproduction.

[14]  D Brusick,et al.  International Commission for Protection Against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. Genotoxicity under extreme culture conditions. A report from ICPEMC Task Group 9. , 1991, Mutation research.

[15]  Lutz Müller,et al.  Erratum to “Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity” [Mut. Res. 584 (2005) 1–256] , 2005 .