An agent-based modeling for collective scene criticality assessment in multi-UV systems

In recent years, the role of unmanned vehicles (UVs) is increased in many surveillance applications; they are substituting the humans in many risky activities, especially when cooperative tasks from UV team are required. To this purpose, this paper presents an agent-based framework that models a multi-UV system for surveillance applications. The agents act as wrappers for the different types of UVs, that capture data from the scene (in the area of the UV mission) and then process them, each one according to its own skills and features. The collected and processed data are then shared from the agent team to find a common agreement on the comprehension and criticality assessment of the scenario. The agent paradigm provides a seamless framework for UV interaction, making the different methodologies and technologies, designed for the different UV types, transparent. The proposal shows the agent-based modeling for a multi-UV system, where each agent hides the facilities and features of the UV it wrapped, with the aim of deploying a homogeneous interface to facilitate the collective scenario assessment in terms of critical or alerting issues, detected in the evolving scene.

[1]  Jian Liu,et al.  A DDDAMS-based planning and control framework for surveillance and crowd control via UAVs and UGVs , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[2]  Huan Xu,et al.  Hierarchal Application of Receding Horizon Synthesis and Dynamic Allocation for UAVs Fighting Fires , 2018, IEEE Access.

[3]  Alfredo Vaccaro,et al.  Using fuzzy transform in multi-agent based monitoring of smart grids , 2017, Inf. Sci..

[4]  Feng Zhang,et al.  Intelligent task allocation method based on improved QPSO in multi-agent system , 2020, J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput..

[5]  Arvin Agah,et al.  Evolving goal-driven multi-agent communication: what, when, and to whom , 2016, Evolutionary Intelligence.

[6]  Sabrina Senatore,et al.  Towards an agent-driven scenario awareness in remote sensing environments , 2018, 2018 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI).

[7]  Axel Schulte,et al.  Behavior Based Task and High Workload Determination of Pilots Guiding Multiple UAVs , 2015 .

[8]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  On dynamic consensus processes in group decision making problems , 2018, Inf. Sci..

[9]  Jose Jesus Castro-Schez,et al.  Multi-agent architecture for information retrieval and intelligent monitoring by UAVs in known environments affected by catastrophes , 2020, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[10]  Matteo Gaeta,et al.  Quasi–consensus in second–order multi–agent systems with sampled data through fuzzy transform , 2016 .

[11]  Sherali Zeadally,et al.  Data collection using unmanned aerial vehicles for Internet of Things platforms , 2019, Comput. Electr. Eng..

[12]  Khaled A. Harras,et al.  Mobile Target Coverage and Tracking on Drone-Be-Gone UAV Cyber-Physical Testbed , 2018, IEEE Systems Journal.

[13]  Alessia Saggese,et al.  A human-like description of scene events for a proper UAV-based video content analysis , 2019, Knowl. Based Syst..

[14]  Aleksandr I. Panov,et al.  Multilayer cognitive architecture for UAV control , 2016, Cognitive Systems Research.

[15]  Carlos Carrascosa,et al.  MAMbO5: a new ontology approach for modelling and managing intelligent virtual environments based on multi-agent systems , 2019, J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput..

[16]  Xin Zhou,et al.  Online Planning for Multiagent Situational Information Gathering in the Markov Environment , 2020, IEEE Systems Journal.

[17]  Lorenzo Comba,et al.  Unsupervised detection of vineyards by 3D point-cloud UAV photogrammetry for precision agriculture , 2018, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[18]  Mohammadreza Jelokhani-Niaraki,et al.  Knowledge sharing in Web-based collaborative multicriteria spatial decision analysis: An ontology-based multi-agent approach , 2018, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[19]  José Antonio López Orozco,et al.  Ant colony optimization for multi-UAV minimum time search in uncertain domains , 2018, Appl. Soft Comput..

[20]  Javier Montero,et al.  The impact of fuzziness in social choice paradoxes , 2008, Soft Comput..

[21]  Michalis Glykas,et al.  Fuzzy cognitive strategic maps in business process performance measurement , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[22]  Kirsi Virrantaus,et al.  Shared situational awareness and information quality in disaster management , 2015 .

[23]  ChangSu Ha,et al.  Semiautonomous Haptic Teleoperation Control Architecture of Multiple Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , 2013, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[24]  Micael S. Couceiro,et al.  MRoCS: A new multi-robot communication system based on passive action recognition , 2016, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[25]  Mohamed Ayoub Messous,et al.  Implementing an emerging mobility model for a fleet of UAVs based on a fuzzy logic inference system , 2017, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[26]  Tran Hiep Dinh,et al.  Enhanced discrete particle swarm optimization path planning for UAV vision-based surface inspection , 2017, ArXiv.

[27]  Rafael H. Bordini,et al.  An Ontology for Collaborative Tasks in Multi-agent Systems , 2015, ONTOBRAS.

[28]  Luis Felipe Gonzalez,et al.  Increasing Autonomy Transparency through capability communication in multiple heterogeneous UAV management , 2015, 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[29]  Javier Bajo,et al.  A multi-agent architecture for mobile sensing systems , 2019, Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing.

[30]  Jiuying Dong,et al.  A group decision-making method considering both the group consensus and multiplicative consistency of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations , 2018, Inf. Sci..

[31]  Krzysztof Janowicz,et al.  An Ontology Design Pattern for Activity Reasoning , 2014, WOP.