Qualitative Analysis Techniques for the Review of the Literature

In this article, we provide a framework for analyzing and interpreting sources that inform a literature review or, as it is more aptly called, a research synthesis. Specifically, using Leech and Onwuegbuzie’s (2007, 2008) frameworks, we delineate how the following four major source types inform research syntheses: talk, observations, drawings/photographs/videos, and documents. We identify 17 qualitative data analysis techniques that are optimal for analyzing one or more of these source types. Further, we outline the role that the following five qualitative data analysis techniques can play in the research synthesis: constant comparison analysis, domain analysis, taxonomic analysis, componential analysis, and theme analysis. We contend that our framework represents a first step in an attempt to help literature reviewers analyze and interpret literature in an optimally rigorous way. Keywords: Review of the Literature, Research Synthesis, Qualitative Analysis, Constant Comparison Analysis, Domain Analysis, Taxonomic Analysis, Componential Analysis, Theme Analysis

[1]  C. Herrera,et al.  School-based mentoring , 2013 .

[2]  Nancy L. Leech,et al.  Beyond Constant Comparison Qualitative Data Analysis: Using NVivo. , 2011 .

[3]  Kim B. Brannagan,et al.  Evaluating Mixed Research Studies: A Mixed Methods Approach , 2010 .

[4]  Nancy L. Leech,et al.  Guidelines for Conducting and Reporting Mixed Research in the Field of Counseling and beyond. , 2010 .

[5]  Lawrence A. Machi,et al.  The literature review : six steps to success , 2009 .

[6]  N. Leech,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: A Compendium of Techniques and a Framework for Selection for School Psychology Research and Beyond. , 2008 .

[7]  Nancy L. Leech,et al.  Interviewing the Interpretive Researcher: A Method for Addressing the Crises of Representation, Legitimation, and Praxis , 2008 .

[8]  Diana Ridley,et al.  The Literature Review: A Step-By-Step Guide for Students , 2008 .

[9]  G. Glass.  Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research , 2008 .

[10]  N. Leech,et al.  An Array of Qualitative Data Analysis Tools: A Call for Data Analysis Triangulation. , 2007 .

[11]  N. Denzin,et al.  The SAGE handbook of qualitative research , 2005 .

[12]  Jennifer McMaken,et al.  Making a Difference in Schools: The Big Brothers Big Sisters School-Based Mentoring Impact Study. , 2007 .

[13]  K. Roulston,et al.  Standards of Evidence in Qualitative Research: An Incitement to Discourse , 2007 .

[14]  Pamela A. Moss,et al.  Standards for Reporting on Empirical Social Science Research in AERA Publications American Educational Research Association , 2006 .

[15]  Karen Skibba.  Book Review: Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach (2nd ed.) , 2006 .

[16]  Penny M. Beile,et al.  Scholars Before Researchers: On the Centrality of the Dissertation Literature Review in Research Preparation , 2005 .

[17]  R. Stake.  Qualitative Case Studies. , 2005 .

[18]  N. Denzin,et al.  Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research. , 2005 .

[19]  Nancy L. Leech,et al.  A Typology of Errors and Myths Perpetuated in Educational Research Textbooks , 2005 .

[20]  Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  Editorial: Evidence-Based Guidelines for Publishing Articles in Research in the Schools and Beyond , 2005 .

[21]  Nancy L. Leech,et al.  Enhancing the Interpretation of Significant Findings: The Role of Mixed Methods Research , 2004 .

[22]  John Willinsky,et al.  Scholarly Associations and the Economic Viability of Open Access Publishing , 2005, J. Digit. Inf..

[23]  Margarete Sandelowski,et al.  Creating Metasummaries of Qualitative Findings , 2003, Nursing research.

[24]  Thomas A. Schwandt.  The SAGE Dictionary of Qualitative Inquiry , 2001 .

[25]  N. Hoffart.  Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[26]  Judith Garrard,et al.  Health Sciences Literature Review Made Easy: The Matrix Method , 1999 .

[27]  C. Hart.  Doing a literature review: releasing the social science research imagination. , 1998 .

[28]  Adrienne Alton-Lee.  A Troubleshooter's Checklist for Prospective Authors Derived from Reviewers' Critical Feedback. , 1998 .

[29]  Joseph A. Maxwell,et al.  Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach , 1996 .

[30]  J. Morse.  The Significance of Saturation , 1995 .

[31]  Pamela Jordan.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques , 1994 .

[32]  R. Yin.  Yin, Robert K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1994. , 1994 .

[33]  J. Maxwell.  Understanding and Validity in Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[34]  Norman E. Wallen,et al.  How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education , 1990 .

[35]  Valerie J. Caracelli,et al.  Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs , 1989 .

[36]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Qualitative Analysis For Social Scientists , 1987 .

[37]  Michael M. J. Fischer,et al.  Anthropology as Cultural Critique , 1986 .

[38]  Anna De Fina,et al.  The ethnographic interview , 2019, The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Ethnography.

[39]  J. Morse,et al.  A literature review of the saturation state of seawater with respect to calcium carbonate and its possible significance for scale formation on OTEC heat exchangers , 1979 .

[40]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[41]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .