Mitigation measures for earthquake induced pounding effects on seismic performance of adjacent buildings

Post-earthquake damages investigation in past and recent earthquakes has illustrated that the building structures are vulnerable to severe damage and/or collapse during moderate to strong ground motion. Among the possible structural damages, seismic induced pounding has been commonly observed in several earthquakes. A parametric study on buildings pounding response as well as proper seismic hazard mitigation practice for adjacent buildings is carried out. Three categories of recorded earthquake excitation are used for input excitations. The effect of impact is studied using linear and nonlinear contact force model for different separation distances and compared with nominal model without pounding consideration. The severity of the impact depends on the dynamic characteristics of the adjacent buildings in combination with the earthquake characteristics. Pounding produces acceleration and shear forces/stresses at various story levels that are greater than those obtained from the no pounding case, while the peak drift depends on the input excitation characteristics. Also, increasing gap width is likely to be effective when the separation is sufficiently wide to eliminate contact. Furthermore, it is effective to provide a shock absorber device system for the mitigation of impact effects between adjacent buildings with relatively narrow seismic gaps, where the sudden changes of stiffness during poundings can be smoothed. This prevents, to some extent, the acceleration peaks due to impact. The pounding forces exerted on the adjacent buildings can be satisfactorily reduced.

[1]  Kazuhiko Kawashima,et al.  EFFECT OF RESTRAINERS TO MITIGATE POUNDING BETWEEN ADJACENT DECKS SUBJECTED TO A STRONG GROUND MOTION , 1997 .

[2]  Abolhassan Astaneh-Asl,et al.  Seismic Performance of Steel Bridges during the 1994 Northridge Earthquake , 1995 .

[3]  Robert Jankowski,et al.  Non‐linear viscoelastic modelling of earthquake‐induced structural pounding , 2005 .

[4]  Jack P. Moehle,et al.  Highway Bridges and Traffic Management , 1995 .

[5]  K. T. Chau,et al.  Pounding of structures modelled as non‐linear impacts of two oscillators , 2001 .

[6]  Michele Barbato,et al.  A probabilistic performance‐based approach for mitigating the seismic pounding risk between adjacent buildings , 2013 .

[7]  Panayiotis C. Polycarpou,et al.  Numerical investigation of potential mitigation measures for poundings of seismically isolated buildings , 2011 .

[8]  René Tinawi,et al.  The August 17, 1999, Kocaeli (Turkey) earthquake lifelines and preparedness , 2001 .

[9]  S. Anagnostopoulos Pounding of buildings in series during earthquakes , 1988 .

[10]  土木学会耐震工学委員会 The 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu earthquake : investigation into damage to Civil Engineering Structures , 1996 .

[11]  John O Sobanjo,et al.  Use of a shared tuned mass damper (STMD) to reduce vibration and pounding in adjacent structures , 2001 .

[12]  Eiichi Watanabe,et al.  Energy Absorption Capacity of the Laminated Fiber Reinforced Rubber Installed at Girder Ends , 2003 .

[13]  Susendar Muthukumar,et al.  A Contact Element Approach with Hysteresis Damping for the Analysis and Design of Pounding in Bridges , 2003 .

[14]  R. Jankowski Pounding force response spectrum under earthquake excitation , 2006 .

[15]  Anat Ruangrassamee,et al.  Relative displacement response spectra with pounding effect , 2001 .

[16]  Gilberto Mosqueda,et al.  Experimental simulation of base‐isolated buildings pounding against moat wall and effects on superstructure response , 2012 .

[17]  Kazuhiko Kasai,et al.  Inelastic Vibration Phase Theory for Seismic Pounding Mitigation , 1996 .

[18]  Anastasis C. Polycarpou,et al.  A nonlinear impact model for simulating the use of rubber shock absorbers for mitigating the effects of structural pounding during earthquakes , 2013 .

[19]  Kohei Fujita,et al.  The 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake and response of high-rise buildings under long-period ground motions , 2011 .

[20]  Anat Ruangrassamee,et al.  Control of nonlinear bridge response with pounding effect by variable dampers , 2003 .

[21]  B. F. Maison,et al.  A study on earthquake pounding between adjacent structures , 1991 .

[22]  Chwee Teck Lim,et al.  A visco‐hyperelastic constitutive model to characterize both tensile and compressive behavior of rubber , 2004 .

[23]  Shehata E. Abdel Raheem Seismic Pounding between Adjacent Building Structures , 2006 .

[24]  Saudi Arabia,et al.  MITIGATION MEASURES FOR SEISMIC POUNDING EFFECTS ON ADJACENT BUILDINGS RESPONSES , 2014 .

[25]  B. F. Maison,et al.  Observation of structural pounding damage from 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake , 1991 .

[26]  K. T. Chau,et al.  Experimental and theoretical simulations of seismic poundings between two adjacent structures , 2003 .

[27]  Stavros A. Anagnostopoulos,et al.  Use of collision shear walls to minimize seismic separation and to protect adjacent buildings from collapse due to earthquake‐induced pounding , 2008 .

[28]  Joseph Penzien,et al.  Evaluation of building separation distance required to prevent pounding during strong earthquakes , 1997 .

[29]  Rajesh P. Dhakal,et al.  Building pounding damage observed in the 2011 Christchurch earthquake , 2012 .

[30]  R. O. Davis,et al.  Pounding of buildings modelled by an impact oscillator , 1992 .

[31]  T. T. Soong,et al.  Evaluation of current criteria in predicting the separation necessary to prevent seismic pounding between nonlinear hysteretic structural systems , 2009 .

[32]  Hong Hao,et al.  Spatial ground motion effect on relative displacement of adjacent building structures , 1999 .

[33]  Shehata E. Abdel Raheem Pounding mitigation and unseating prevention at expansion joints of isolated multi-span bridges , 2009 .

[34]  Chris P. Pantelides,et al.  LINEAR AND NONLINEAR POUNDING OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS , 1998 .

[35]  Panayiotis C. Polycarpou,et al.  Earthquake-induced poundings of a seismically isolated building with adjacent structures , 2010 .

[36]  Aaron Yakel,et al.  High Performance Materials in Bridges , 2003 .

[37]  Krzysztof Wilde,et al.  Reduction of pounding effects in elevated bridges during earthquakes , 2000 .

[38]  Marios C. Phocas,et al.  Response of seismically isolated buildings considering poundings , 2007 .

[39]  Toshiro Hayashikawa,et al.  PARAMETRIC STUDY ON STEEL TOWER SEISMIC RESPONSE OF CABLE-STAYED BRIDGES UNDER GREAT EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION , 2003 .