Evaluation of Whole-Body Vibration Exposure Among Urban Metro Drivers: Comparing ISO2631-1 and ISO2631-5 Standards to Evaluate Exposure

Background: Excessive vibration is one of the harmful agents in the work environment, and many drivers are inevitably exposed to that during driving. Objectives: Using ISO 2631-1&5 standards in the present study, the evaluation of the whole-body vibration (WBV) exposure was carried among Tehran metro drivers. Methods: In this descriptive cross-sectional study, 23 trains were investigated and the level of exposure to vibration during daily working shift and vibration indicators were evaluated. According to ISO 2631-1, the following 5 factors were measured: the rate of frequency- weight acceleration r.m.s for each axis, the combination of axes, crest factor, peak acceleration, vibration dose value (VDV), and recent equivalent static compressive stress (Sed) and risk (R) factors - estimation criteria for damage to lumbar spine. Results: The results indicated that based on the basic method, the levels of drivers exposure to the vibration are less than the lower limit set by health guidance caution zone (HGCZ), and according to the VDV methods, 4 cases were found to be above the upper limit, 8 cases were within the HGCZ, and the rest were less than the mentioned limit. Moreover, according to the Sed method, 4 drivers had exposures below the lower limit, 7 had exposures within the range of HGCZ, and 12 of the mover the limit. On the other hand, on the basis of R factor, the levels of exposure of the 3 drivers were within the range of HGCZ, while the rest of them experienced the levels lower than that. Conclusions: The results showed that there are several differences among the calculated criteria confirming that some of these indicators may not show a safe limit.

[1]  Keykaous Azrah,et al.  Predicting health risks of exposure to whole body vibration in the urban taxi drivers , 2016 .

[2]  Hiroji Tsujimura,et al.  Measurement of Whole‐Body Vibration in Taxi Drivers , 2004, Journal of occupational health.

[3]  Martin P H Smets,et al.  Whole-body vibration experienced by haulage truck operators in surface mining operations: a comparison of various analysis methods utilized in the prediction of health risks. , 2010, Applied ergonomics.

[4]  Laurence Vico,et al.  Effects of whole body vibration on the skeleton and other organ systems in man and animal models: What we know and what we need to know , 2008, Ageing Research Reviews.

[5]  Monique H. W. Frings-Dresen,et al.  Two way assessment of other physical work demands while measuring the whole body vibration magnitude , 2008 .

[6]  Andreas Lumbe Aas,et al.  A case study of ISO 11064 in control centre design in the Norwegian petroleum industry. , 2010, Applied ergonomics.

[7]  Shahira M. Habashy,et al.  Evaluation of Whole-Body-Vibration Exposure to Cairo Subway (Metro) Passengers , 2012 .

[8]  M. Griffin,et al.  A COMPARISON OF EVALUATIONS AND ASSESSMENTS OBTAINED USING ALTERNATIVE STANDARDS FOR PREDICTING THE HAZARDS OF WHOLE-BODY VIBRATION AND REPEATED SHOCKS , 1998 .

[9]  Nabih Alem,et al.  Application of the new ISO 2631-5 to health hazard assessment of repeated shocks in U.S. Army vehicles. , 2005, Industrial health.

[10]  Eckardt Johanning,et al.  Vibration and shock exposure of maintenance-of-way vehicles in the railroad industry. , 2011, Applied ergonomics.

[11]  M. Khandan,et al.  Industrial workers' postures analysis by a new method named “loading on the upper body assessment” in Iran , 2017 .

[12]  Börje Rehn,et al.  Variation in exposure to whole-body vibration for operators of forwarder vehicles - aspects on measurement strategies and prevention , 2005 .

[13]  Robin Burgess-Limerick,et al.  Whole-body vibration exposure of haul truck drivers at a surface coal mine. , 2014, Applied ergonomics.

[14]  Eckardt Johanning,et al.  Whole-body vibration and ergonomic study of US railroad locomotives , 2006 .

[15]  John J. Gordon,et al.  Shock and impact levels on North American locomotives , 2008 .

[16]  M. Griffin,et al.  EVALUATION OF WHOLE-BODY VIBRATION IN VEHICLES , 2002 .

[17]  John J. Gordon,et al.  Shock and impact on North American locomotives evaluated with ISO 2631 parts 1 and 5 , 2006 .

[18]  Joan M. Stevenson,et al.  Predictions of health risks associated with the operation of load-haul-dump mining vehicles: Part 1—Analysis of whole-body vibration exposure using ISO 2631-1 and ISO-2631-5 standards , 2008 .

[19]  Xiaojing Zhao,et al.  Evaluation of whole-body vibration exposure experienced by operators of a compact wheel loader according to ISO 2631-1:1997 and ISO 2631-5:2004 , 2014 .

[20]  M. Khandan,et al.  Occupational health, safety, and ergonomics challenges and opportunities based on the organizational structure analysis: A case study in the selected manufacturing industries in Qom Province, Iran, 2015 , 2017 .

[21]  M. H. Ebrahimi,et al.  The effects of the manner of carrying the bags on musculoskeletal symptoms in school students in the city of Ilam, Iran , 2017 .