The Vocabulary of Introductory Physics and Its Implications for Learning Physics

In science new words might be “invented” to name or describe new processes, discoveries, or inventions. However, for the most part, the scientific vocabulary is formed from words we use throughout our lives in everyday language. When we begin studying science we learn new meanings of words we had previously used. Sometimes these new meanings may contradict everyday meanings or seem counterintuitive. We often learn words in association with objects and situations.1 Due to these associations that students bring to class, they may not interpret the physics meaning correctly. This misinterpretation of language leads students to confusion that is sometimes classified as a misconception.2–6 Research about the semantics used in physics textbooks7–9 and the meaning of words has been done,10–12 but the problem seems to go beyond semantics.8 The linguistic relativity hypothesis, sometimes referred to as the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis,1 says that “we see and hear and otherwise experience very largely as we do because th...

[1]  C. Hart.  If the Sun burns you is that a force? Some definitional prerequisites for understanding Newton's laws , 2002 .

[2]  Arnold B. Arons,et al.  Teaching Introductory Physics , 1996 .

[3]  H. Thomas Williams,et al.  Semantics in teaching introductory physics , 1999 .

[4]  L. McDermott.  Research on conceptual understanding in mechanics , 1984 .

[5]  I. Greca,et al.  Mental, physical, and mathematical models in the teaching and learning of physics , 2002 .

[6]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Complex Cognition: The Psychology of Human Thought , 2001 .

[7]  Model Analysis: Assessing the dynamics of student learning , 2002, physics/0207069.

[8]  R. Osborne,et al.  Children’s dynamics , 1984 .

[9]  David Hammer,et al.  More than misconceptions: Multiple perspectives on student knowledge and reasoning, and an appropriate role for education research , 1996 .

[10]  E. Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual , 1999 .

[11]  David Hammer,et al.  Student resources for learning introductory physics , 2000 .

[12]  D. Hestenes,et al.  Force concept inventory , 1992 .

[13]  S. Vosniadou.  Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. , 1994 .

[14]  Lei Bao,et al.  Model analysis of fine structures of student models: An example with Newton’s third law , 2002 .

[15]  David P Maloney,et al.  Surveying students’ conceptual knowledge of electricity and magnetism , 2001 .

[16]  J. Creswell.  Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. , 1998 .

[17]  J. Matolyak,et al.  Simple variable mass systems: Newton's second law , 1990 .

[18]  Edward F. Redish,et al.  Implications of cognitive studies for teaching physics , 1994 .

[19]  Jerold S. Touger,et al.  When words fail us , 1991 .

[20]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[21]  Ronald K. Thornton,et al.  Assessing student learning of Newton’s laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula , 1998 .

[22]  N. Sanjay Rebello,et al.  Identifying Students' Models of Sound Propagation , 2002 .

[23]  Robert S. Siegler,et al.  DavidConceptual competition in physics learning , 1993 .

[24]  David Palmer,et al.  The effect of context on students’ reasoning about forces , 1997 .

[25]  D. Styer.  The word “force” , 2001 .

[26]  Robert J. Whitaker,et al.  Aristotle is not dead: Student understanding of trajectory motion , 1983 .

[27]  ‘‘Aristotelian’’ was given as the answer, but what was the question? , 1985 .

[28]  Language as a confounding variable in the diagnosis of misconceptions , 2000 .