Laws are supposed to tell us how physical systems actually behave. The analysis of an important part of physical practice--abstraction--shows, however, that laws describe the behavior of physical systems under very special circumstances, namely when they are isolated. Nevertheless, laws are applied in cases of non-isolation as well. This practice requires an explanation. It is argued that one has to assume that physical systems have dispositions. I take these to be innocuous from an empiricist's standpoint because they can--at least in principle--be measured. Laws can be applied whenever such a disposition is present, they describe how the physical system would behave if the disposition were manifest.
[1]
Georges Rey,et al.
When Other Things Aren't Equal: Saving Ceteris Paribus Laws from Vacuity
,
1995,
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
[2]
Van Fraassen,et al.
Laws and symmetry
,
1989
.
[3]
J. L. Mackie,et al.
The Matter of Chance.
,
1971
.
[4]
I. Hacking,et al.
Representing and Intervening.
,
1986
.
[5]
Arno R Bohm,et al.
Quantum Mechanics: Foundations and Applications
,
1993
.
[6]
G. Joseph,et al.
The Many Sciences and the One World
,
1980
.
[7]
N. Cartwright.
How the laws of physics lie
,
1984
.