A case study of the modified Hirsch index hm accounting for multiple coauthors

J. E. Hirsch (2005) introduced the h-index to quantify an individual's scientific research output by the largest number h of a scientist's papers, that received at least h citations. This so-called Hirsch index can be easily modified to take multiple co-authorship into account by counting the papers fractionally according to (the inverse of) the number of authors. I have worked out 26 empirical cases of physicists to illustrate the effect of this modification. Although the correlation between the original and the modified Hirsch index is relatively strong, the arrangement of the datasets is significantly different depending on whether they are put into order according to the values of either the original or the modified index.

[1]  Duncan Lindsey,et al.  Production and Citation Measures in the Sociology of Science: The Problem of Multiple Authorship , 1980 .

[2]  Peter Vinkler,et al.  Research contribution, authorship and team cooperativeness , 2005, Scientometrics.

[3]  Michael Schreiber,et al.  A modification of the h-index: The hm-index accounts for multi-authored manuscripts , 2008, J. Informetrics.

[4]  R. Rousseau,et al.  Fractional counts for authorship attribution: a numerical study , 1995 .

[5]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[6]  Héctor Guerrero,et al.  A robust formula to credit authors for their publications , 2004, Scientometrics.

[7]  I. Lukovits,et al.  Correct credit distribution: A model for sharing credit among coauthors , 1995 .

[8]  Michael Schreiber,et al.  Self-citation corrections for the Hirsch index , 2007 .

[9]  Guido Van Hooydonk.  Fractional Counting of Multiauthored Publications: Consequences for the Impact of Authors , 1997, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[10]  Michael Schreiber,et al.  A case study of the Hirsch index for 26 non‐prominent physicists , 2007, 0708.0120.

[11]  Leo Egghe,et al.  Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries: Consequences for evaluation studies , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[12]  L. Egghe.  An improvement of the h-index: the g-index , 2006 .

[13]  Quentin L. Burrell,et al.  On the h-index, the size of the Hirsch core and Jin's A-index , 2007, J. Informetrics.

[14]  Martha A. Harsanyi.  Multiple authors, multiple problems: bibliometrics and the study of scholarly collaboration: a literature review , 1993 .

[15]  Michael Schreiber,et al.  To share the fame in a fair way, hm modifies h for multi-authored manuscripts , 2008 .

[16]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[17]  Peter Vinkler,et al.  Eminence of scientists in the light of the h-index and other scientometric indicators , 2007, J. Inf. Sci..

[18]  Leo Egghe,et al.  Introduction to Informetrics: Quantitative Methods in Library, Documentation and Information Science , 1990 .

[19]  Mônica G. Campiteli,et al.  Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? , 2006, Scientometrics.

[20]  R. Rousseau,et al.  The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index , 2007 .

[21]  T. Keats,et al.  On multiple authorship. , 1996, Skeletal radiology.

[22]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  The pure h-index: calculating an author’s h- index by taking co-authors into account , 2007 .

[23]  Leo Egghe,et al.  Mathematical theory of the h- and g-index in case of fractional counting of authorship , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[24]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  What do we know about the h index? , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[25]  Michael Schreiber,et al.  An empirical investigation of the g-index for 26 physicists in comparison with the h-index, the A-index, and the R-index , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..