The Efficacy of the Tabby Improved Prevention and Intervention Program in Reducing Cyberbullying and Cybervictimization among Students

Background. This article presents results from the evaluation of the Tabby Improved Prevention and Intervention Program (TIPIP) for cyberbullying and cybervictimization. TIPIP is theoretically designed to address cyberbullying and cybervictimization. It is the first program in this field developed combining the Ecological System Theory and the Threat Assessment Approach. Method. The Tabby Improved program was evaluated using an experimental design with 759 Italian students (aged 10–17 years) randomly allocated via their classes to either the Experimental or Control Group. Results. Repeated measures ANOVAs showed a significant decrease both in cyberbullying and cybervictimization among students who received the intervention with a follow-up period of six months. The program was more effective for boys than for girls. Conclusions. Because cyberbullying is a cruel problem negatively affecting those involved, validated interventions that prove their efficacy in reducing the problem using experimental designs should be widely tested and promoted, paying particular attention to implementing a program fully to increase and guarantee its effectiveness.

[1]  K. Loewenthal.  An Introduction to Psychological Tests and Scales , 2018 .

[2]  D. Farrington,et al.  Are cyberbullying intervention and prevention programs effective? A systematic and meta-analytical review , 2019, Aggression and Violent Behavior.

[3]  Vicente J. Llorent,et al.  Are children involved in cyberbullying low on empathy? A systematic review and meta-analysis of research on empathy versus different cyberbullying roles , 2019, Aggression and Violent Behavior.

[4]  G. Deboutte,et al.  Psychometric data of a questionnaire to measure cyberbullying bystander behavior and its behavioral determinants among adolescents , 2018, Data in brief.

[5]  D. Farrington,et al.  The TABBY Online Project: The Threat Assessment of Bullying Behaviours Online Approach , 2018 .

[6]  Ibrahim Tanrikulu.  Cyberbullying prevention and intervention programs in schools: A systematic review , 2017 .

[7]  Annarita Sorrentino,et al.  Risk and Needs Assessment , 2017 .

[8]  David P. Farrington,et al.  Cyberbullying in youth: A pattern of disruptive behaviour , 2016 .

[9]  Christiane Spiel,et al.  Effectiveness and sustainability of the ViSC Social Competence Program to prevent cyberbullying and cyber-victimization: Class and individual level moderators. , 2016, Aggressive behavior.

[10]  Rosario Del Rey,et al.  Impact of the ConRed program on different cyberbulling roles. , 2016, Aggressive behavior.

[11]  Ersilia Menesini,et al.  Evidence-based intervention against bullying and cyberbullying: Evaluation of the NoTrap! program in two independent trials. , 2016, Aggressive behavior.

[12]  Donna Cross,et al.  Longitudinal impact of the Cyber Friendly Schools program on adolescents' cyberbullying behavior. , 2016, Aggressive behavior.

[13]  H. Scheithauer,et al.  Feeling cybervictims' pain-The effect of empathy training on cyberbullying. , 2016, Aggressive behavior.

[14]  Ralf Dresner,et al.  Health Measurement Scales A Practical Guide To Their Development And Use , 2016 .

[15]  David P. Farrington,et al.  “Am I at risk of cyberbullying”? A narrative review and conceptual framework for research on risk of cyberbullying and cybervictimization: The risk and needs assessment approach , 2015 .

[16]  Catherine P. Bradshaw,et al.  The overlap between cyberbullying and traditional bullying. , 2015, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[17]  Herbert Scheithauer,et al.  Prevention 2.0: Targeting Cyberbullying @ School , 2014, Prevention Science.

[18]  T. Little,et al.  Effects of the KiVa Antibullying Program on Cyberbullying and Cybervictimization Frequency Among Finnish Youth , 2013, Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53.

[19]  Ann Frisén,et al.  Cyberbullying assessment instruments: A systematic review , 2013 .

[20]  B. Vossekuil,et al.  Protective Intelligence and Threat Assessment Investigations: A Guide for State and Local Law Enforcement Officials , 2013 .

[21]  Robert Slonje,et al.  The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[22]  Ersilia Menesini,et al.  Online and offline peer led models against bullying and cyberbullying. , 2012, Psicothema.

[23]  Çiğdem Topcu,et al.  Affective and cognitive empathy as mediators of gender differences in cyber and traditional bullying , 2012 .

[24]  Rosario Del Rey,et al.  Knowing, Building and Living Together on Internet and Social Networks: The ConRed Cyberbullying Prevention Program , 2012 .

[25]  Ersilia Menesini,et al.  Empowering Students Against Bullying and Cyberbullying: Evaluation of an Italian Peer-led Model , 2012 .

[26]  R. Ortega,et al.  The emotional responses of victims of cyberbullying: Worry and indifference , 2012 .

[27]  C. Salmivalli,et al.  Counteracting bullying in Finland: The KiVa program and its effects on different forms of being bullied , 2011 .

[28]  D. Farrington,et al.  Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: a systematic and meta-analytic review , 2011 .

[29]  A. Sourander,et al.  Psychosocial risk factors associated with cyberbullying among adolescents: a population-based study. , 2010, Archives of general psychiatry.

[30]  Robert S. Tokunaga,et al.  Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[31]  G. Norman.  Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics , 2010, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[32]  R. O. Ruiz,et al.  El estudio científico del fenómeno bulling , 2010 .

[33]  David P. Farrington,et al.  School-Based Programs to Reduce Bullying and Victimization , 2012 .

[34]  Meng-Jia Wu,et al.  Interventions for Children, Youth, and Parents to Prevent and Reduce Cyber Abuse , 2009 .

[35]  D. Farrington,et al.  What works in preventing bullying: effective elements of anti‐bullying programmes , 2009 .

[36]  Michael Livingston,et al.  Multilevel Analysis for Applied Research—It's Just Regression! , 2009 .

[37]  Juan Calmaestra,et al.  The emotional impact on victims of traditional bullying and cyberbullying: A study of Spanish adolescents. , 2009 .

[38]  Elisheva F. Gross,et al.  Extending the school grounds?--Bullying experiences in cyberspace. , 2008, The Journal of school health.

[39]  Peter K. Smith,et al.  Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. , 2008, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[40]  N. Willard.  Cyberbullying and Cyberthreats: Responding to the Challenge of Online Social Aggression, Threats, and Distress , 2007 .

[41]  M. Lipsey,et al.  School-based interventions for aggressive and disruptive behavior: update of a meta-analysis. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[42]  L. Hedges,et al.  Intraclass Correlation Values for Planning Group-Randomized Trials in Education , 2007 .

[43]  Mark W. Lipsey,et al.  The Effects of School‐Based Social Information Processing Interventions on Aggressive Behavior, Part I: Universal Programs , 2006 .

[44]  Robert F. Boruch,et al.  Standards of Evidence: Criteria for Efficacy, Effectiveness and Dissemination , 2005, Prevention Science.

[45]  L. Rajmil.  Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use, 3rd ed , 2005 .

[46]  David P. Farrington,et al.  Evaluation of an intervention program for the reduction of bullying and victimization in schools , 2004 .

[47]  J. Gliem,et al.  Calculating, Interpreting, And Reporting Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability Coefficient For Likert-Type Scales , 2003 .

[48]  B Vossekuil,et al.  Threat assessment: defining an approach for evaluating risk of targeted violence. , 1999, Behavioral sciences & the law.

[49]  R A Fein,et al.  Assassination in the United States: an operational study of recent assassins, attackers, and near-lethal approachers. , 1999, Journal of forensic sciences.

[50]  B. Vossekuil,et al.  Threat Assessment: An Approach To Prevent Targeted Violence: (517592006-001) , 1995 .

[51]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[52]  M. Zaslow,et al.  Review of The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. , 1981 .

[53]  U. Bronfenbrenner.  Toward an Experimental Ecology of Human Development. , 1977 .