GOVERNING THE AMAZON TIMBER INDUSTRY FOR MAXIMUM SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS

ABSTRACT The timber industry in the Brazilian Amazon is currently supplied primarily with timber from private properties. Each year, hundreds of informal contracts are made between Amazon logging companies and small-holders. Loggers receive timber, while farmers receive cash and/or improvements in their road networks. The proposed Brazilian National Forest Programme emphasizes the development of concession-based forestry within an expanded system of National Forests, explicitly avoiding the forests that are occupied by people. It will therefore miss important opportunities for the timber industry to improve the livelihoods of millions of low-income farmers, extractivists, and indigenous people. Recent partnerships between industry and farmers in agricultural settlements demonstrate the pivotal role that progressive timber companies can play in assisting farm communities with their development. Such alliances are favoured by current environmental and agrarian reform policies, including the generous government funding for road construction and housing that accompanies new settlements. Communities in extractive reserves and in the floodplain forests of the Amazon estuary have similarly demonstrated the direct benefits that can accrue to forest residents through control, management, processing, and sale of their wood resources. The policy challenge is to foster a new generation of relationships among the rural poor, timber companies, and environmental and social agencies in order to enhance the How of benefits to the rural poor, while avoiding large-scale logging- and fire-induced impoverishment of Amazon forests.

[1]  F. Merry,et al.  Forest Taxes, Timber Concessions, and Policy Choices in the Amazon , 2005 .

[2]  D. Nepstad,et al.  Managing the Amazon Timber Industry , 2004 .

[3]  Bill Weber,et al.  The Arrogance of America's Designer Ark , 2004 .

[4]  D. Nepstad,et al.  A Risky Forest Policy in the Amazon? , 2003, Science.

[5]  M. Cochrane,et al.  National Forests in the Amazon , 2002, Science.

[6]  J. Barlow,et al.  Effects of ground fires on understorey bird assemblages in Amazonian forests , 2002 .

[7]  M. Cochrane,et al.  Priority Areas for Establishing National Forests in the Brazilian Amazon , 2002 .

[8]  D. Nepstad,et al.  Road paving, fire regime feedbacks, and the future of Amazon forests , 2001 .

[9]  G. Amacher,et al.  Royalty Systems, Government Revenues, and Forest Condition: An Application from Malaysia , 2001, Land Economics.

[10]  P. Fearnside Soybean cultivation as a threat to the environment in Brazil , 2001, Environmental Conservation.

[11]  D. Nepstad,et al.  Sensitive development could protect Amazonia instead of destroying it , 2001, Nature.

[12]  C. Potter,et al.  Large-scale impoverishment of Amazonian forests by logging and fire , 1999, Nature.

[13]  M. Cochrane,et al.  Fire as a Recurrent Event in Tropical Forests of the Eastern Amazon: Effects on Forest Structure, Biomass, and Species Composition 1 , 1999 .

[14]  C. Uhl,et al.  FIRE IN AMAZONIAN SELECTIVELY LOGGED RAIN FOREST AND THE POTENTIAL FOR FIRE REDUCTION , 1997 .

[15]  J. Gray Underpricing and Overexploitation of Tropical Forests , 1996 .

[16]  C. Uhl,et al.  Economic and ecological perspectives on ranching in the Eastern Amazon , 1994 .

[17]  R. Deacon Public Policies and the Misuse of Forest Resources , 1992 .

[18]  J. Kauffman,et al.  Deforestation, Fire Susceptibility, and Potential Tree Responses to Fire in the Eastern Amazon , 1990 .

[19]  R. Buschbacher,et al.  A disturbing synergism between cattle ranch burning practices and selective tree harvesting in the eastern Amazon. , 1985 .

[20]  D. Nepstad,et al.  Flames in the rain forest : origins, impacts and alternatives to Amazonian fires , 1999 .

[21]  R. Repetto,et al.  Public policies and the misuse of forest resources: A World Resources Institute Book , 1988 .