The Need for Scientific Experiments: The Experience of Pre-service Science Teachers

The availability of scientific information nowadays necessitates scientifically literate learners and teachers well-versed in both content and nature of science (NOS). Despite a clear description of NOS in the Malaysian Education Blueprint, NOS elements have been sidelined by educational practices in Malaysia. This study illuminates the conceptions of pre-service science teachers in Malaysia about one aspect of NOS— the purpose for scientific experimentation. A phenomenographic approach was used to achieve this aim where 10 pre-service teachers were interviewed. Findings revealed three categories, namely a) Experiments prove, b) Experiments invent, and c) Experiments support ideas. The findings also inferred that there are more ways to conceptualise the purpose of scientific experiments other than what has been previously reported. This paper concludes with suggestions on improving the current practices of experimentation in schools and calls for a rethink on the current teachers’ preparatory course in Malaysia.

[1]  Peter A. Rubba,et al.  Development of an instrument to assess secondary school students understanding of the nature of scientific knowledge , 1978 .

[2]  William F. McComas,et al.  THE PRINCIPAL ELEMENTS OF THE NATURE OF SCIENCE: DISPELLING THE MYTHS , 1998 .

[3]  Samantha Sin,et al.  Considerations of Quality in Phenomenographic Research , 2010 .

[4]  Fouad Abd-El-Khalick,et al.  Embedding Nature of Science Instruction in Preservice Elementary Science Courses: Abandoning Scientism, But... , 2001 .

[5]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science , 2002 .

[6]  Rola Khishfe,et al.  The development of seventh graders' views of nature of science , 2008 .

[7]  Beh Kian Lim,et al.  Pre-service teachers" conceptions of the Nature of Science , 2013 .

[8]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  A comparison of scientific epistemological views between mainland China and Taiwan high school students , 2012 .

[9]  Historical short stories and the nature of science in a high school biology classroom , 2010 .

[10]  Herbert S. Lin,et al.  They’re Not Dumb, They’re Different: Stalking the Second Tier , 1991 .

[11]  George E. DeBoer,et al.  Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform , 2000 .

[12]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  Pre-service Teachers’ Understanding and Teaching of Nature of Science: An Intervention Study , 2001 .

[13]  Norman G. Lederman Relating Teaching Behavior and Classroom Climate to Changes in Students' Conceptions of the Nature of Science. , 1986 .

[14]  Deborah L. Hanuscin,et al.  Teaching nature of science through inquiry: Results of a 3-year professional development program , 2007 .

[15]  F. Marton,et al.  Learning and Awareness , 1997 .

[16]  Francesc Pedró,et al.  The New Millennium Learners: Challenging our Views on ICT and Learning , 2006 .

[17]  Klaudia Kaiser Reading The Book Of Nature An Introduction To The Philosophy Of Science , 2016 .

[18]  Reg Dennick,et al.  Exploring culture, language and the perception of the nature of science , 2002 .

[19]  K. Popper,et al.  Conjectures and refutations;: The growth of scientific knowledge , 1972 .

[20]  P. Ramsden Improving Learning: New Perspectives , 1988 .

[21]  Norman G. Lederman Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research , 1992 .

[22]  Susan Carey,et al.  `An experiment is when you try it and see if it works': a study of grade 7 students' understanding of the construction of scientific knowledge , 1989 .

[23]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  The influence of history of science courses on students' views of nature of science , 2000 .

[24]  K. Popper,et al.  Conjectures and refutations;: The growth of scientific knowledge , 1972 .

[25]  IDENTIFYING VARIATIONS IN THINKING ABOUT THE NATURE OF SCIENCE: A PHENOMENOGRAPHIC STUDY , 2010 .

[26]  Hans-Jürgen Schmidt,et al.  Shift of meaning and students' alternative concepts , 2003 .

[27]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry , 2004 .

[28]  Kenneth P. King Technology, Science Teaching, and Literacy: A Century of Growth , 2001 .

[29]  Jorgen Sandburg Are Phenomenographic Results Reliable , 1997 .

[30]  Georgios Tsaparlis,et al.  Students' levels of explanations, models, and misconceptions in basic quantum chemistry: A phenomenographic study , 2009 .

[31]  J. Morse,et al.  Verification Strategies for Establishing Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research , 2002 .

[32]  Stuart A. Karabenick,et al.  Culture and Personal Epistemology: U.S. and Middle Eastern Students’ beliefs about Scientific Knowledge and Knowing , 2005 .

[33]  Jörgen Sandberg Understanding Human Competence at Work: An Interpretative Approach , 2000 .

[34]  William F. McComas,et al.  The nature of science in science education : rationales and strategies , 1998 .

[35]  A. Gurwitsch,et al.  The field of consciousness , 1964 .

[36]  C. Bruce Seven faces of information literacy , 1997 .

[37]  渋江 靖弘,et al.  Science for All Americans , 1990 .

[38]  A. Ahlgren,et al.  Science for all Americans , 1990 .

[39]  F. Chen,et al.  An analysis of the Public Scientific Literacy study in China , 2009 .

[40]  R. Hackett Young People's Images of Science , 1996 .

[41]  Chris Cope,et al.  Ensuring Validity and Reliability in Phenomenographic Research Using the Analytical Framework of a Structure of Awareness , 2004 .