Dissociations in Performance on Novel Versus Irregular Items: Single-Route Demonstrations With Input Gain in Localist and Distributed Models

Four pairs of connectionist simulations are presented in which quasi-regular mappings are computed using localist and distributed representations. In each simulation, a control parameter termed input gain was modulated over the only level of representation that mapped inputs to outputs. Input gain caused both localist and distributed models to shift between regularity-based and item-based modes of processing. Performance on irregular items was selectively impaired in the regularity-based modes, whereas performance on novel items was selectively impaired in the item-based modes. Thus, the models exhibited double dissociations without separable processing components. These results are discussed in the context of analogous dissociations found in language domains such as word reading and inflectional morphology.

[1]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  PHONOLOGY AND LANGUAGE USE , 2004, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[2]  Christopher T. Kello,et al.  The Emergence of a Double Dissociation in the Modulation of a Single Control Parameter in a Nonlinear Dynamical System , 2003, Cortex.

[3]  Kim Kirsner,et al.  What Can we Infer from Double Dissociations? , 2003, Cortex.

[4]  S. Petersen,et al.  A procedure for identifying regions preferentially activated by attention to semantic and phonological relations using functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  B. Hayes,et al.  Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: a computational/experimental study , 2003, Cognition.

[6]  D. Shanks,et al.  Neuropsychological dissociations between priming and recognition: a single-system connectionist account. , 2003, Psychological review.

[7]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  Language learning and innateness: Some implications of Compounds Research , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  Thomas H. Carr,et al.  The brain is not single-minded about inflectional morphology: A response to the commentaries , 2003, Brain and Language.

[9]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Deficits in phonology and past-tense morphology: What's the connection? , 2003 .

[10]  James L. McClelland,et al.  ‘Words or Rules’ cannot exploit the regularity in exceptions , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  S. Pinker,et al.  The past and future of the past tense , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Rules or connections in past-tense inflections: what does the evidence rule out? , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  Steven Pinker,et al.  The Nature of Regularity and Irregularity: Evidence from Hebrew Nominal Inflection , 2002, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[14]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Deficits in irregular past-tense verb morphology associated with degraded semantic knowledge , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  S E Shaywitz,et al.  Neurobiological studies of reading and reading disability. , 2001, Journal of communication disorders.

[16]  Randall C. O'Reilly,et al.  Generalization in Interactive Networks: The Benefits of Inhibitory Competition and Hebbian Learning , 2001, Neural Computation.

[17]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Self-Organizing Dynamics of Lexical Access in Normals and Aphasics , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  U. Hahn,et al.  German Inflection: Single Route or Dual Route? , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  D. Plaut,et al.  The task dependence of staged versus cascaded processing: an empirical and computational study of Stroop interference in speech production. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[20]  P. Juola Double dissociations and neurophysiological expectations. , 2000, Brain and cognition.

[21]  Christopher T. Kello,et al.  Strategic control in word reading: evidence from speeded responding in the tempo-naming task. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  H. Clahsen,et al.  Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflection , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[23]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Impairments in verb morphology after brain injury: a connectionist model. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Simon A. J. Winder A model for biological winner-take-all neural competition employing inhibitory modulation of NMDA-mediated excitatory gain , 1999, Neurocomputing.

[25]  Karalyn Patterson,et al.  Selective disorders of reading? , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[26]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Rules, representations, and the English past tense , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  Jean-Marc Fellous,et al.  Computational Models of Neuromodulation , 1998, Neural Computation.

[28]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The role of examples and rules in the acquisition of a cognitive skill. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Dissociating types of mental computation , 1997, Nature.

[30]  S. Pinker,et al.  A Neural Dissociation within Language: Evidence that the Mental Dictionary Is Part of Declarative Memory, and that Grammatical Rules Are Processed by the Procedural System , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  Barak A. Pearlmutter Gradient calculations for dynamic recurrent neural networks: a survey , 1995, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[32]  K. Patterson Phonological ALEXIA or PHONOLOGICAL alexia , 1995 .

[33]  D. Plaut Double dissociation without modularity: evidence from connectionist neuropsychology. , 1995, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[34]  Paul W. B. Atkins,et al.  Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. , 1993 .

[35]  J. Hodges,et al.  Deterioration of word meaning: Implications for reading , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Surface dyslexia and dysgraphia: dual routes, single lexicon , 1992 .

[37]  R. Nosofsky Relations between exemplar-similarity and likelihood models of classification , 1990 .

[38]  Richard J. Brown Neuropsychology Mental Structure , 1989 .

[39]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[40]  S. Pinker,et al.  On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition , 1988, Cognition.

[41]  T. Bever,et al.  The relation between linguistic structure and associative theories of language learning—A constructive critique of some connectionist learning models , 1988, Cognition.

[42]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Conspiracy effects in word pronunciation. , 1987 .

[43]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  A general framework for parallel distributed processing , 1986 .

[44]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[45]  E. Funnell Phonological processes in reading: new evidence from acquired dyslexia. , 1983, British journal of psychology.

[46]  Janice Kay,et al.  One Process, Not Two, in Reading Aloud: Lexical Analogies Do the Work of Non-Lexical Rules , 1981 .

[47]  R. Glushko The Organization and Activation of Orthographic Knowledge in Reading Aloud. , 1979 .

[48]  John J. L. Morton,et al.  Interaction of information in word recognition. , 1969 .

[49]  M T Ullman,et al.  The Declarative/Procedural Model of Lexicon and Grammar , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[50]  M Coltheart,et al.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.

[51]  Bruce F. Pennington,et al.  What do double dissociations prove? , 2001, Cogn. Sci..

[52]  David C. Plaut,et al.  Strategic Control Over Rate of Processing in Word Reading: A Computational Investigation of the Tempo-Naming Task , 2000 .

[53]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Category-Specific Semantic Deficits in Focal and Widespread Brain Damage: A Computational Account , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[54]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[55]  S. Sloman The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .

[56]  M. Coltheart Phonological dyslexia: Past and future issues. , 1996 .

[57]  Y. Chauvin,et al.  Backpropagation: the basic theory , 1995 .

[58]  D. Medin,et al.  The specific character of abstract thought: Categorization, problem-solving, and induction: Volume 5 , 1989 .

[59]  Royal Skousen,et al.  Analogical Modeling Of Language , 1989 .

[60]  R. Sternberg Advances in the psychology of human intelligence , 1982 .

[61]  G. Miller,et al.  Cognitive science. , 1981, Science.