Fortnightly review: Treating acute pain in hospital

In treating acute pain, tradition and ill informed prejudice sometimes hold sway over evidence and common sense. In this review we concentrate on simple, clinically appropriate, and evidence based treatments. FIG 1 Factors influencing the pain reported by patients Whenever possible we based our recommendations on systematic reviews of randomised trials. A citation database of systematic reviews of pain relief can be found at http://www.jr2.ox.ac.uk/Bandolier/painres/MApain.html. 1 We chose reviews for their relevance and quality. Poor quality reviews are significantly more likely to make positive conclusions.1 We collected over 12 000 randomised trials of analgesic interventions from 1950 onwards2; these are available on the Cochrane database. We used trials from this database when there was no relevant systematic review. #### Summary points Opt for safety and simplicity Measure and record pain regularly–be proactive Choose evidence based interventions Trust patients and tailor treatment to their individual needs and allow them to have control Choose appropriate drug, route, and mode of delivery Educate staff and patients The neurophysiology of acute pain may be complex, with sensory, affective, cognitive, and behavioural dimensions intertwined (fig 1). Although pain is influenced by all the factors in figure 1), the subjective measurement of pain has proved to be robust. At its simplest the patient reports pain, and this report is the yardstick against which doctors measure the effects of treatment. The message is “believe the patient.” Doctors cannot measure pain objectively, so the management of pain in patients who cannot report pain, such as babies and those who are unconscious, may pose problems. Effective pain management is fundamental to the quality of care. We believe that good control of pain also speeds recovery, but there is still no compelling evidence that this is so. Advantage can be shown with proxy measures such as mobility or coughing, but evidence …

[1]  N. Laird,et al.  Incidence of Adverse Drug Events and Potential Adverse Drug Events: Implications for Prevention , 1995 .

[2]  M. Tramèr,et al.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in labour pain: a systematic review , 1997, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[3]  Watts Rw,et al.  A Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy of Epidural Corticosteroids in the Treatment of Sciatica: , 1995 .

[4]  L. Bouter,et al.  Steroid injections for shoulder disorders: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. , 1996, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[5]  N. Laird,et al.  Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events , 1995 .

[6]  D B Carr,et al.  Postoperative patient-controlled analgesia: meta-analyses of initial randomized control trials. , 1993, Journal of clinical anesthesia.

[7]  H. Szeto,et al.  Accumulation of normeperidine, an active metabolite of meperidine, in patients with renal failure of cancer. , 1977, Annals of internal medicine.

[8]  L. Berggren,et al.  Organization of acute pain services: a low-cost model , 1994, Pain.

[9]  D. Carroll,et al.  Paracetamol with and without codeine in acute pain: a quantitative systematic review , 1997, Pain.

[10]  L. Bouter,et al.  Efficacy of epidural steroid injections for low-back pain and sciatica: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials , 1995, Pain.

[11]  A. Jadad,et al.  Meta-analyses to evaluate analgesic interventions: a systematic qualitative review of their methodology. , 1996, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[12]  M. Tramèr,et al.  Randomization is important in studies with pain outcomes: systematic review of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in acute postoperative pain. , 1996, British journal of anaesthesia.

[13]  D. Benhamou,et al.  Epidural Analgesics , 1998 .

[14]  C. Silagy,et al.  A Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy of Epidural Corticosteroids in the Treatment of Sciatica , 1995, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[15]  H. Jick,et al.  Addiction rare in patients treated with narcotics. , 1980, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  T. Delbanco,et al.  National survey of hospital patients , 1994, BMJ.

[17]  R. E. Kane.  Neurologic Deficits following Epidural or Spinal Anesthesia , 1981, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[18]  C. Benedetti,et al.  Development of an Anesthesiology‐based Postoperative Pain Management Service , 1988, Anesthesiology.

[19]  J. Webster,et al.  Policy for controlling pain after surgery: effect of sequential changes in management. , 1992, BMJ.

[20]  D. Gavaghan,et al.  Deriving dichotomous outcome measures from continuous data in randomised controlled trials of analgesics , 1996, PAIN®.

[21]  R. Moore,et al.  Single-patient data meta-analysis of 3453 postoperative patients: oral tramadol versus placebo, codeine and combination analgesics , 1997, Pain.

[22]  R. Moore,et al.  Postoperative orthopaedic pain — the effect of opiate premedication and local anaesthetic blocks , 1988, Pain.

[23]  H. McQuay,et al.  Opiate receptors: Their role in effect and side-effect , 1990 .

[24]  N. Rawal.  Organization of acute pain services--a low-cost model. , 1994, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[25]  P. Richardson,et al.  Clinical management of acute pain. , 1991, British medical bulletin.

[26]  S. Hill,et al.  Variability in risk of gastrointestinal complications with individual non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: results of a collaborative meta-analysis , 1996, BMJ.

[27]  H. McQuay,et al.  Pre-emptive analgesia: a systematic review of clinical studies. , 1995, Annals of medicine.

[28]  I. Fraser,et al.  Safety of early pain relief for acute abdominal pain. , 1992, BMJ.