Structure of Protein Interaction Networks and Their Implications on Drug Design

Protein-protein interaction networks (PINs) are rich sources of information that enable the network properties of biological systems to be understood. A study of the topological and statistical properties of budding yeast and human PINs revealed that they are scale-rich and configured as highly optimized tolerance (HOT) networks that are similar to the router-level topology of the Internet. This is different from claims that such networks are scale-free and configured through simple preferential-attachment processes. Further analysis revealed that there are extensive interconnections among middle-degree nodes that form the backbone of the networks. Degree distributions of essential genes, synthetic lethal genes, synthetic sick genes, and human drug-target genes indicate that there are advantageous drug targets among nodes with middle- to low-degree nodes. Such network properties provide the rationale for combinatorial drugs that target less prominent nodes to increase synergetic efficacy and create fewer side effects.

[1]  A. Henney,et al.  A network solution , 2008, Nature.

[2]  H. Kitano.  A robustness-based approach to systems-oriented drug design , 2007, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[3]  K. Sneppen,et al.  Specificity and Stability in Topology of Protein Networks , 2002, Science.

[4]  A. Barabasi,et al.  The human disease network , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Andrey Rzhetsky,et al.  Birth of scale-free molecular networks and the number of distinct DNA and protein domains per genome , 2001, Bioinform..

[6]  M. DePamphilis,et al.  HUMAN DISEASE , 1957, The Ulster Medical Journal.

[7]  Walter Willinger,et al.  More "normal" than normal: scaling distributions and complex systems , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Simulation Conference, 2004..

[8]  Hans-Werner Mewes,et al.  MPact: the MIPS protein interaction resource on yeast , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[9]  R. Tsien,et al.  Specificity and Stability in Topology of Protein Networks , 2022 .

[10]  David S. Wishart,et al.  DrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[11]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Drug—target network , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[12]  H. Kitano.  Towards a theory of biological robustness , 2007, Molecular systems biology.

[13]  L. Mirny,et al.  Protein complexes and functional modules in molecular networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Andrey Rzhetsky,et al.  Quantitative systems-level determinants of human genes targeted by successful drugs. , 2008, Genome research.

[15]  D. Vitkup,et al.  Network properties of genes harboring inherited disease mutations , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Global Mapping of the Yeast Genetic Interaction Network , 2004, Science.

[17]  Walter Willinger,et al.  Understanding Internet topology: principles, models, and validation , 2005, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[18]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[19]  M. Tyers,et al.  Stratus Not Altocumulus: A New View of the Yeast Protein Interaction Network , 2006, PLoS biology.

[20]  Lan V. Zhang,et al.  Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein–protein interaction network , 2004, Nature.

[21]  R. Albert.  Scale-free networks in cell biology , 2005, Journal of Cell Science.

[22]  S. L. Wong,et al.  Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein–protein interaction network , 2005, Nature.

[23]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[24]  S. Low,et al.  The "robust yet fragile" nature of the Internet. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  A. Vázquez.  Growing network with local rules: preferential attachment, clustering hierarchy, and degree correlations. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[26]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  Disordered domains and high surface charge confer hubs with the ability to interact with multiple proteins in interaction networks , 2006, FEBS letters.

[27]  R. Tanaka,et al.  Scale-rich metabolic networks. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[28]  Walter Willinger,et al.  A first-principles approach to understanding the internet's router-level topology , 2004, SIGCOMM '04.