Calvarial Thickness and Its Relation to Cranial Bone Harvest

Background: The purpose of this study was to define the variability in skull thickness from location to location and from individual to individual in a large number of human skulls. Method: Skull thickness was measured in multiple areas of the calvaria in 281 dry skulls from the Hamman-Todd osteological collection (Cleveland Museum of Natural History, Cleveland, Ohio). A total of 40 points were determined over the frontal, occipital, and parietal bones, with a higher number of points concentrated on the latter. Repeated measures analysis of variance models were used to assess the effects of covariates (individual variables) on skull thickness and location. Result: A statistically significant pattern of increased thickness toward the posterior parietal bones was seen in all subgroups. The mean thickness of the skull across all locations was 6.32 mm (SEM, 0.07 mm) and ranged from 5.3 mm (SEM, 0.09 mm) to 7.5 mm (SEM, 0.09 mm). Age was not found to be a significant predictor of mean skull thickness. Differences between male and female skulls were greater toward the rear of the parietal bones. Conclusion: The thickest area of the skull is the parasagittal posterior parietal area in male skulls and the posterior parietal area midway between the sagittal and superior temporal line in female skulls. An accurate map of the skull thickness representing the normative data of the studied population was developed. It is hoped that this topographic map will assist the surgeons in choosing the safest area of cranial bone graft harvest, thus increasing the safety of the procedure.

[1]  L. Hopkins,et al.  Superior sagittal sinus laceration complicating an autogenous calvarial bone graft harvest: report of a case. , 1990, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[2]  P. Smith,et al.  Diachronic variation in cranial thickness of Near Eastern populations. , 1985, American journal of physical anthropology.

[3]  M. Keen Complications of harvesting cranial bone grafts. , 1995, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.

[4]  P. Tessier Autogenous bone grafts taken from the calvarium for facial and cranial applications. , 1982, Clinics in plastic surgery.

[5]  K R Kattan,et al.  Thickness of the normal skull in the American Blacks and Whites. , 1975, American journal of physical anthropology.

[6]  Roche Af,et al.  Increase in cranial thickness during growth. , 1953 .

[7]  A H Ross,et al.  Cranial thickness in American females and males. , 1998, Journal of forensic sciences.

[8]  Wolfe Sa,et al.  Complications associated with the harvesting of cranial bone grafts. , 1995 .

[9]  S. Wolfe,et al.  Complications Associated with the Harvesting of Cranial Bone Grafts , 1995, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[10]  A. Smith,et al.  The split calvarial graft donor site in the elderly: a study in cadavers. , 1989, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[11]  S. Baik,et al.  Thickness map of parietal bone in Korean adults. , 1997, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[12]  J Sampalis,et al.  Ultrasound in the assessment of cranial bone thickness. , 1997, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[13]  L. Whitaker,et al.  The Early Revascularization of Membranous Bone , 1985, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[14]  L A Whitaker,et al.  Membranous versus Endochondral Bone: Implications for Craniofacial Reconstruction , 1983, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[15]  J. Zins,et al.  A simple fail-safe method for the harvesting of cranial bone. , 1995, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[16]  H. Zarem,et al.  Bone grafts for nasal reconstruction. , 1982, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[17]  U. Bite,et al.  Update on Cranial Bone Grafts in Craniofacial Surgery , 1987, Annals of plastic surgery.

[18]  J. McCarthy,et al.  The Calvarial Donor Site: An Anatomic Study in Cadavers , 1985, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[19]  I. Jackson Long-term follow-up of cranial bone graft in dorsal nasal augmentation. , 1999 .

[20]  A. Roche Increase in cranial thickness during growth. , 1953, Human biology.

[21]  D. Lieberman How and why humans grow thin skulls: experimental evidence for systemic cortical robusticity. , 1996, American journal of physical anthropology.

[22]  I. Jackson,et al.  Long‐Term Follow‐Up of Cranial Bone Graft in Dorsal Nasal Augmentation , 1998, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[23]  P. Manson,et al.  Frontal Cranioplasty: Risk Factors and Choice of Cranial Vault Reconstructive Material , 1986, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[24]  H. Wilkinson Autogeneic skull bone grafts. , 1987, Neurosurgery.

[25]  H. Ishida,et al.  Cranial thickness of modern and neolithic populations in Japan. , 1990, Human biology.