Asymmetric All-Pay Auctions with Incomplete Information: The Two-Player Case

Abstract We prove existence and uniqueness of (Bayesian) equilibrium for a class of generally asymmetric all-pay auctions with incomplete information. Due to its importance in applications some prominence is given to the first-price all-pay auction, for which a detailed characterization of equilibrium and an approximation to equilibrium of its well-studied complete information version are supplied. Furthermore, we relate our uniqueness result to the well-known multiplicity of equilibria in the “war of attrition” (second-price all-pay auction), which emerges as a “limit” point of the class of two-player auction games considered.Journalof Economic LiteratureClassification Numbers: D44, C62, C72.

[1]  Gary S. Becker,et al.  Public Policies, Pressure Groups, and Dead Weight Costs , 1985 .

[2]  Michael R. Baye,et al.  The all-pay auction with complete information , 1990 .

[3]  J. Vickers,et al.  Perfect Equilibrium in a Model of a Race , 1985 .

[4]  R. Tollison,et al.  Toward a theory of the rent-seeking society , 1982 .

[5]  W. Güth,et al.  A comparison of pricing rules for auctions and fair division games , 1986 .

[6]  J. Riley,et al.  Evolutionary equilibrium strategies. , 1979, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  Innovation and the persistence of monopoly , 1992 .

[8]  J. Riley,et al.  Politically Contestable Rents And Transfers , 1989 .

[9]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Optimal Auction Design , 1981, Math. Oper. Res..

[10]  Wolfgang Leininger,et al.  Patent competition, rent dissipation, and the persistence of monopoly: The role of research budgets , 1991 .

[11]  M. Shubik The Dollar Auction game: a paradox in noncooperative behavior and escalation , 1971 .

[12]  Michael Plum,et al.  Characterization and computation of nash-equilibria for auctions with incomplete information , 1992 .

[13]  D. Samet,et al.  Dissipation of contestable rents by small numbers of contenders , 1987 .

[14]  P. Dasgupta,et al.  Industrial Structure and the Nature of Innovative Activity , 1980 .

[15]  J. Riley,et al.  Strong evolutionary equilibrium and the war of attrition. , 1980, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  Walter Stromquist,et al.  Numerical Analysis of Asymmetric First Price Auctions , 1994 .

[17]  J. Riley,et al.  Asymmetric equilibria in the war of attrition , 1985 .

[18]  D. Fudenberg,et al.  A Theory of Exit in Duopoly , 1986 .

[19]  P. Hartman Ordinary Differential Equations , 1965 .

[20]  J. Harsanyi Games with randomly disturbed payoffs: A new rationale for mixed-strategy equilibrium points , 1973 .

[21]  Drew Fudenberg,et al.  Preemption, Leapfrogging, and Co­mpetition in Patent Races , 1983 .

[22]  Barry Nalebuff,et al.  Prices and Incentives: Towards a General Theory of Compensation and Competition , 1983 .

[23]  Wolfgang Leininger,et al.  Escalation and Cooperation in Conflict Situations , 1989 .

[24]  John Vickers,et al.  Patent Races and the Persistence of Monopoly , 1985 .

[25]  J. M. Smith The theory of games and the evolution of animal conflicts. , 1974, Journal of theoretical biology.

[26]  R. Rosenthal Bargaining rules of thumb , 1993 .

[27]  B. O'Neill International Escalation and the Dollar Auction , 1986 .

[28]  C. Cannings,et al.  The Generalized War of Attrition , 1997 .

[29]  Robert J. Weber,et al.  Distributional Strategies for Games with Incomplete Information , 1985, Math. Oper. Res..

[30]  G. Becker,et al.  A Theory of Competition Among Pressure Groups for Political Influence , 1983 .