Bioinformatics and Biosimulations as Toolbox for Peptides and Peptidomimetics Design: Where Are We?

Peptides and peptidomimetics are strongly re-emerging as amenable candidates in the development of therapeutic strategies against a plethora of pathologies. In particular, these molecules are extremely suitable to treat diseases in which a major role is played by protein–protein interactions (PPIs). Unlike small organic compounds, peptides display both a high degree of specificity avoiding secondary off-targets effects and a relatively low degree of toxicity. Further advantages are provided by the possibility to easily conjugate peptides to functionalized nanoparticles, so improving their delivery and cellular uptake. In many cases, such molecules need to assume a specific three-dimensional conformation that resembles the bioactive one of the endogenous ligand. To this end, chemical modifications are introduced in the polypeptide chain to constrain it in a well-defined conformation, and to improve the drug-like properties. In this context, a successful strategy for peptide/peptidomimetics design and optimization is to combine different computational approaches ranging from structural bioinformatics to atomistic simulations. Here, we review the computational tools for peptide design, highlighting their main features and differences, and discuss selected protocols, among the large number of methods available, used to assess and improve the stability of the functional folding of the peptides. Finally, we introduce the simulation techniques employed to predict the binding affinity of the designed peptides for their targets.

[1]  Martin Saunders,et al.  Conformations of cycloheptadecane. A comparison of methods for conformational searching , 1990 .

[2]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  Efficient estimation of free energy differences from Monte Carlo data , 1976 .

[3]  A. Laio,et al.  Characterization of the free-energy landscapes of proteins by NMR-guided metadynamics , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Lichun Sun,et al.  Peptide-Based Drug Development , 2013 .

[5]  L. Otvos,et al.  Current challenges in peptide-based drug discovery , 2014, Front. Chem..

[6]  Andy Chi-Lung Lee,et al.  A Comprehensive Review on Current Advances in Peptide Drug Development and Design , 2019, International journal of molecular sciences.

[7]  Haim J. Wolfson,et al.  PepCrawler: a fast RRT-based algorithm for high-resolution refinement and binding affinity estimation of peptide inhibitors , 2011, Bioinform..

[8]  Jaynelle F Stichler,et al.  A comprehensive approach. , 2004, Marketing health services.

[9]  B. Roux,et al.  Calculation of absolute protein-ligand binding free energy from computer simulations. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  István Kolossváry,et al.  Low-mode conformational search elucidated: Application to C39H80 and flexible docking of 9-deazaguanine inhibitors into PNP , 1999, J. Comput. Chem..

[11]  Saul Wolfe,et al.  A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO THE CONFORMATIONAL ANALYSIS OF CYCLIC COMPOUNDS , 1994 .

[12]  Daria Mochly-Rosen,et al.  Peptidomimetic therapeutics: scientific approaches and opportunities. , 2017, Drug discovery today.

[13]  Zhiyuan Hu,et al.  Targeting Peptide‐Based Probes for Molecular Imaging and Diagnosis , 2018, Advanced materials.

[14]  Johan Hofkens,et al.  Tracking Structural Phase Transitions in Lead‐Halide Perovskites by Means of Thermal Expansion , 2019, Advanced materials.

[15]  Victor M. Zavala,et al.  A machine learning framework for the analysis and prediction of catalytic activity from experimental data , 2020, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental.

[16]  G. Chang,et al.  An internal-coordinate Monte Carlo method for searching conformational space , 1989 .

[17]  Joost Schymkowitz,et al.  Computational design of peptide ligands. , 2011, Trends in biotechnology.

[18]  Emilio Gallicchio,et al.  The Binding Energy Distribution Analysis Method (BEDAM) for the Estimation of Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities. , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[19]  F. Cicconardi,et al.  Handling FMRP and its molecular partners: Structural insights into Fragile X Syndrome. , 2019, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[20]  István Kolossváry,et al.  Low Mode Search . An Efficient , Automated Computational Method for Conformational Analysis : Application to Cyclic and Acyclic Alkanes and Cyclic Peptides , 1997 .

[21]  D. Wales Discrete path sampling , 2002 .

[22]  Stefano Alcaro,et al.  Ligand binding to telomeric G-quadruplex DNA investigated by funnel-metadynamics simulations , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Ken A Dill,et al.  Computed Binding of Peptides to Proteins with MELD-Accelerated Molecular Dynamics. , 2017, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[24]  F. Formaggio,et al.  Rational Design of Antiangiogenic Helical Oligopeptides Targeting the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptors , 2019, Front. Chem..

[25]  Oliver F. Lange,et al.  Structure prediction for CASP8 with all‐atom refinement using Rosetta , 2009, Proteins.

[26]  Françoise Ochsenbein,et al.  Targeting protein–protein interactions, a wide open field for drug design , 2016 .

[27]  Hasup Lee,et al.  GalaxyPepDock: a protein–peptide docking tool based on interaction similarity and energy optimization , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[28]  Martin Zacharias,et al.  Fully Blind Peptide-Protein Docking with pepATTRACT. , 2015, Structure.

[29]  Gordon M. Crippen,et al.  Distance Geometry and Molecular Conformation , 1988 .

[30]  Benoît Roux,et al.  Free Energy Perturbation Hamiltonian Replica-Exchange Molecular Dynamics (FEP/H-REMD) for Absolute Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations. , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[31]  Haiou Li,et al.  PaFlexPepDock: Parallel Ab-Initio Docking of Peptides onto Their Receptors with Full Flexibility Based on Rosetta , 2014, PloS one.

[32]  D. Wales,et al.  Energy landscapes of a hairpin peptide including NMR chemical shift restraints. , 2015, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[33]  D. Lane,et al.  Structural insights reveal a recognition feature for tailoring hydrocarbon stapled-peptides against the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E protein† †Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c8sc03759k , 2019, Chemical science.

[34]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[35]  James C. Collins,et al.  The Current State of Peptide Drug Discovery: Back to the Future? , 2017, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[36]  Can Heterocyclic γ-Peptides Provide Polyfunctional Platforms for Synthetic Glycocluster Construction? , 2018, Chemistry.

[37]  A. Laio,et al.  A bias-exchange approach to protein folding. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[38]  Y. Sugita,et al.  Multidimensional replica-exchange method for free-energy calculations , 2000, cond-mat/0009120.

[39]  G. Colombo,et al.  Ligand Binding, Unbinding and Allosteric Effects: Deciphering Small-Molecule Modulation of HSP90. , 2019, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[40]  Pierre Tufféry,et al.  PEP-FOLD: an updated de novo structure prediction server for both linear and disulfide bonded cyclic peptides , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..

[41]  E. Gallicchio,et al.  Assessment of a Single Decoupling Alchemical Approach for the Calculation of the Absolute Binding Free Energies of Protein-Peptide Complexes , 2018, Front. Mol. Biosci..

[42]  M. Magzoub,et al.  Cancer targeting peptides , 2019, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[43]  Zhengwei Peng,et al.  Druggability assessment of protein-protein interfaces. , 2011, Future medicinal chemistry.

[44]  Haim J. Wolfson,et al.  PinaColada: peptide-inhibitor ant colony ad-hoc design algorithm , 2016, Bioinform..

[45]  Timothy W. Craven,et al.  A Rotamer Library to Enable Modeling and Design of Peptoid Foldamers , 2014, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[46]  Edward W. Lowe,et al.  Computational Methods in Drug Discovery , 2014, Pharmacological Reviews.

[47]  E. Gallicchio,et al.  A unique binding mode of the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E for guiding the design of novel peptide inhibitors , 2015, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[48]  Jolene L. Lau,et al.  Therapeutic peptides: Historical perspectives, current development trends, and future directions. , 2017, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.

[49]  D. Wales Energy landscapes and properties of biomolecules , 2005, Physical biology.

[50]  Emelyn Smith,et al.  A comparison of the Low Mode and Monte Carlo conformational search methods. , 2002, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[51]  J. Kirkwood Statistical Mechanics of Fluid Mixtures , 1935 .

[52]  Jorge Nocedal,et al.  On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization , 1989, Math. Program..

[53]  J. Doye,et al.  Global Optimization by Basin-Hopping and the Lowest Energy Structures of Lennard-Jones Clusters Containing up to 110 Atoms , 1997, cond-mat/9803344.

[54]  V. Hruby,et al.  Peptidomimetics, a synthetic tool of drug discovery. , 2008, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[55]  David J Wales,et al.  Folding of the GB1 hairpin peptide from discrete path sampling. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[56]  V. Limongelli Ligand binding free energy and kinetics calculation in 2020 , 2020 .

[57]  Philip Bradley,et al.  Structure‐based prediction of protein–peptide specificity in rosetta , 2010, Proteins.

[58]  Christophe Chipot,et al.  Standard binding free energies from computer simulations: What is the best strategy? , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[59]  Frank Noé,et al.  Markov state models of biomolecular conformational dynamics. , 2014, Current opinion in structural biology.

[60]  Bing Xia,et al.  High-resolution global peptide-protein docking using fragments-based PIPER-FlexPepDock , 2017, bioRxiv.

[61]  A. Roitberg,et al.  Coupling of replica exchange simulations to a non-Boltzmann structure reservoir. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[62]  P. Jørgensen,et al.  Walking on potential energy surfaces , 1983 .

[63]  M. Parrinello,et al.  Well-tempered metadynamics: a smoothly converging and tunable free-energy method. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[64]  Modesto Orozco,et al.  A theoretical view of protein dynamics. , 2014, Chemical Society reviews.

[65]  R. Kaptein,et al.  Time- and ensemble-averaged direct NOE restraints , 1994, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[66]  Benoît Roux,et al.  Extension to the weighted histogram analysis method: combining umbrella sampling with free energy calculations , 2001 .

[67]  P. Kollman,et al.  Binding of a diverse set of ligands to avidin and streptavidin: an accurate quantitative prediction of their relative affinities by a combination of molecular mechanics and continuum solvent models. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[68]  Albert C. Pan,et al.  Pathway and mechanism of drug binding to G-protein-coupled receptors , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[69]  Richard H. Henchman,et al.  Standard Free Energy of Binding from a One-Dimensional Potential of Mean Force. , 2009, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[70]  Klaus R Liedl,et al.  Peptidic Macrocycles - Conformational Sampling and Thermodynamic Characterization , 2018, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[71]  Vittorio Limongelli,et al.  Funnel-metadynamics and solution NMR to estimate protein-ligand affinities. , 2015, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[72]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Distance geometry. , 1989, Methods in enzymology.

[73]  Michael R. Shirts,et al.  Statistically optimal analysis of samples from multiple equilibrium states. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.

[74]  Carlo Camilloni,et al.  Replica-Averaged Metadynamics. , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[75]  Roy L. Johnston,et al.  Exploring the Energy Landscapes of Cyclic Tetrapeptides with Discrete Path Sampling , 2012, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[76]  E. Gallicchio,et al.  Recent Advances in Computational Models for the Study of Protein-Peptide Interactions. , 2016, Advances in protein chemistry and structural biology.

[77]  Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin,et al.  A Unified Conformational Selection and Induced Fit Approach to Protein-Peptide Docking , 2013, PloS one.

[78]  Carlo Camilloni,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations with replica-averaged structural restraints generate structural ensembles according to the maximum entropy principle. , 2013, The Journal of chemical physics.

[79]  Avraham Ben-Shimon,et al.  AnchorDock: Blind and Flexible Anchor-Driven Peptide Docking. , 2015, Structure.

[80]  Jaap Keijer,et al.  Diet-Independent Correlations between Bacteria and Dysfunction of Gut, Adipose Tissue, and Liver: A Comprehensive Microbiota Analysis in Feces and Mucosa of the Ileum and Colon in Obese Mice with NAFLD , 2018, International journal of molecular sciences.

[81]  C. Jarzynski Nonequilibrium Equality for Free Energy Differences , 1996, cond-mat/9610209.

[82]  David J Wales,et al.  Exploring Energy Landscapes. , 2018, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[83]  B. Roux,et al.  Computations of standard binding free energies with molecular dynamics simulations. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[84]  E. Novellino,et al.  From a Helix to a Small Cycle: Metadynamics-Inspired αvβ6 Integrin Selective Ligands. , 2018, Angewandte Chemie.

[85]  A. Spitaleri,et al.  Use of metadynamics in the design of isoDGR-based αvβ3 antagonists to fine-tune the conformational ensemble. , 2011, Angewandte Chemie.

[86]  Gilda Stefanelli,et al.  Tyr120Asp mutation alters domain flexibility and dynamics of MeCP2 DNA binding domain leading to impaired DNA interaction: Atomistic characterization of a Rett syndrome causing mutation. , 2018, Biochimica et biophysica acta. General subjects.

[87]  P. Kollman,et al.  Continuum Solvent Studies of the Stability of DNA, RNA, and Phosphoramidate−DNA Helices , 1998 .

[88]  Maciej Pietrzyk,et al.  Knowledge Based Modeling , 1999 .

[89]  Anna Tramontano,et al.  PepComposer: computational design of peptides binding to a given protein surface , 2016, Nucleic Acids Res..

[90]  Chao Yang,et al.  Computational peptidology: a new and promising approach to therapeutic peptide design. , 2013, Current medicinal chemistry.

[91]  Woody Sherman,et al.  Improved Docking of Polypeptides with Glide , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[92]  Michele Vendruscolo,et al.  Determination of Conformational Equilibria in Proteins Using Residual Dipolar Couplings , 2011, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[93]  F. A. Neugebauer,et al.  Electrochemical oxidation and structural changes of 5,6-dihydrobenzo[c]cinnolines , 1996 .

[94]  Huiyong Sun,et al.  Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 9. Prediction reliability of binding affinities and binding poses for protein-peptide complexes. , 2019, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[95]  G. Torrie,et al.  Nonphysical sampling distributions in Monte Carlo free-energy estimation: Umbrella sampling , 1977 .

[96]  S. Wilson,et al.  Applications of simulated annealing to peptides , 1990, Biopolymers.

[97]  A. Tramontano,et al.  MD and Docking Studies Reveal That the Functional Switch of CYFIP1 is Mediated by a Butterfly-like Motion. , 2015, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[98]  M. Parrinello,et al.  Funnel metadynamics as accurate binding free-energy method , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[99]  D. Wales,et al.  Transmembrane structures for Alzheimer's Aβ(1-42) oligomers. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[100]  H. Scheraga,et al.  Monte Carlo-minimization approach to the multiple-minima problem in protein folding. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[101]  B. Berne,et al.  Replica exchange with solute tempering: a method for sampling biological systems in explicit water. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[102]  Burak Erman,et al.  VitAL: Viterbi Algorithm for de novo Peptide Design , 2010, PloS one.

[103]  C. Bagni,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations show how the FMRP Ile304Asn mutation destabilizes the KH2 domain structure and affects its function , 2014, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[104]  Chandra S Verma,et al.  Stapled peptide design: principles and roles of computation. , 2016, Drug Discovery Today.

[105]  C. Jarzynski Equilibrium free-energy differences from nonequilibrium measurements: A master-equation approach , 1997, cond-mat/9707325.

[106]  J. Mongan,et al.  Accelerated molecular dynamics: a promising and efficient simulation method for biomolecules. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[107]  Sridhar Nadamuni Targeting Protein-Protein Interactions , 2013 .

[108]  Danielle M. Valcourt,et al.  Advances in targeted nanotherapeutics: From bioconjugation to biomimicry , 2018, Nano Research.

[109]  V. Pande,et al.  Markov State Models: From an Art to a Science. , 2018, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[110]  Iris Antes,et al.  DynaDock: A new molecular dynamics‐based algorithm for protein–peptide docking including receptor flexibility , 2010, Proteins.

[111]  Viktor Hornak,et al.  Improving Convergence of Replica-Exchange Simulations through Coupling to a High-Temperature Structure Reservoir. , 2007, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[112]  E. Pirogova,et al.  Evaluation of the use of therapeutic peptides for cancer treatment , 2017, Journal of Biomedical Science.

[113]  Vittorio Limongelli,et al.  The Molecular Mechanism Underlying Ligand Binding to the Membrane-Embedded Site of a G-Protein-Coupled Receptor. , 2018, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[114]  N. Kunda Antimicrobial peptides as novel therapeutics for nonsmall cell lung cancer. , 2019, Drug discovery today.

[115]  W. Miller,et al.  ON FINDING TRANSITION STATES , 1981 .

[116]  Stefano Moro,et al.  Bridging Molecular Docking to Molecular Dynamics in Exploring Ligand-Protein Recognition Process: An Overview , 2018, Front. Pharmacol..

[117]  A. Laio,et al.  Free-energy landscape for beta hairpin folding from combined parallel tempering and metadynamics. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[118]  A. Laio,et al.  Escaping free-energy minima , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[119]  L. Mabonga,et al.  Peptidomimetics: A Synthetic Tool for Inhibiting Protein–Protein Interactions in Cancer , 2019, International Journal of Peptide Research and Therapeutics.

[120]  Hao Li,et al.  HPEPDOCK: a web server for blind peptide–protein docking based on a hierarchical algorithm , 2018, Nucleic Acids Res..

[121]  Eric T. Kim,et al.  How does a drug molecule find its target binding site? , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[122]  Khader Shameer,et al.  PeptideMine - A webserver for the design of peptides for protein-peptide binding studies derived from protein-protein interactomes , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.

[123]  A. Vercelli,et al.  Exploring the role of MKK7 in excitotoxicity and cerebral ischemia: a novel pharmacological strategy against brain injury , 2015, Cell Death and Disease.

[124]  Mateusz Kurcinski,et al.  CABS-dock web server for the flexible docking of peptides to proteins without prior knowledge of the binding site , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[125]  Junmei Wang,et al.  End-Point Binding Free Energy Calculation with MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA: Strategies and Applications in Drug Design. , 2019, Chemical reviews.

[126]  David J. Wales,et al.  Some further applications of discrete path sampling to cluster isomerization , 2004 .

[127]  Baldomero Oliva,et al.  Knowledge-based modeling of peptides at protein interfaces: PiPreD , 2015, Bioinform..

[128]  J. Åqvist,et al.  Ligand binding affinities from MD simulations. , 2002, Accounts of chemical research.

[129]  Rafael C. Bernardi,et al.  Enhanced sampling techniques in molecular dynamics simulations of biological systems. , 2015, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[130]  Dima Kozakov,et al.  High-resolution global peptide-protein docking using fragments-based PIPER-FlexPepDock , 2017 .

[131]  Jerelle A. Joseph,et al.  Intrinsically Disordered Landscapes for Human CD4 Receptor Peptide. , 2018, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[132]  W. Rocchia,et al.  dMM-PBSA: A New HADDOCK Scoring Function for Protein-Peptide Docking , 2016, Front. Mol. Biosci..

[133]  K. Schulten,et al.  Molecular dynamics study of unbinding of the avidin-biotin complex. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[134]  M. Parrinello,et al.  Sampling protein motion and solvent effect during ligand binding , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[135]  Rajamani Lakshminarayanan,et al.  Rational Optimization of Conformational Effects Induced By Hydrocarbon Staples in Peptides and their Binding Interfaces , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[136]  G C P van Zundert,et al.  The HADDOCK2.2 Web Server: User-Friendly Integrative Modeling of Biomolecular Complexes. , 2016, Journal of molecular biology.