Product Line Characteristics as Determinants of Quick Response Implementation for U.S. Apparel Manufacturers

The purpose of this study was to identify the implementation of QR technologies by a broad spectrum of U.S. apparel manufacturers and to examine relationships between organizational characteristics and implementation of QR technologies. Conceptual framework for the study was based on the environmental interpretation model in the business domain (Daft & Weick, 1984, p. 284). The implementation level of selected QR technologies was the dependent variable, and the independent variables were product category, fashion change, and seasonal change. A better understanding of QR is needed to increase implementation of this approach to environmental change. A random sample of 306 U.S. apparel manufacturers was selected from a purchased list. A mail questionnaire was pilot tested, and the revised survey questionnaire was sent to plant managers. Adjusted response rate was 47% (n = 103). Descriptive statistics and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used for data analysis. The most frequently used QR technologies were small lot orders, production planning with customer, computerized inventory, and short cycle cut planning. Fashion change was significantly related to implementation of QR technologies. This study contributes to the knowledge of the fashion change variable and has implications for strategic planning by U.S. apparel manufacturers.

[1]  Ranga V. Ramasesh,et al.  Measurement of manufacturing flexibility: A value based approach , 1991 .

[2]  Grace I. Kunz,et al.  Apparel manufacturing: Sewn product analysis , 1990 .

[3]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Organizational Problem Formulation: An Empirical Study. , 1980 .

[4]  Doris H. Kincade,et al.  An Analysis of Sewing Systems with a Focus on Alabama Apparel Producers , 1995 .

[5]  Toni M. Somers,et al.  The measurement of manufacturing flexibility , 1992 .

[6]  Andrea Vinelli,et al.  An analytical scheme for the change of the apparel design process towards quick response , 1996 .

[7]  Gary Natriello.  FOCUS , 1985, Digital-Age Innovation in Higher Education.

[8]  Lawrence C. Rhyne.  The Relationship of Strategic Planning to Financial Performance , 1986 .

[9]  J. Dutton,et al.  THE CREATION OF MOMENTUM FOR CHANGE THROUGH THE PROCESS OF STRATEGIC ISSUE DIAGNOSIS , 1987 .

[10]  T. Addison.  EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS , 1993, Patterns of Development in Latin America.

[11]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation , 1993 .

[12]  Nancy L. Cassill,et al.  Company Demographics as an Influence on Adoption of Quick Response by North Carolina Apparel Manufacturers , 1993 .

[13]  A morphology of quick response strategies for the apparel industry , 1988 .

[14]  K. Dickerson.  Inside the fashion business , 1965 .

[15]  D. Dillman.  Mail and telephone surveys : the total design method , 1979 .

[16]  L. L. Cummings,et al.  Perceived Environmental Uncertainty: Effects of Information and Structure , 1975 .

[17]  Gerald I. Susman,et al.  Uncertainty and Type of Management System in Continuous Process Organizations , 1974 .

[18]  J. Child.  Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice , 1972 .

[19]  Kitty G. Dickerson,et al.  Textiles and Apparel in the International Economy , 1991 .

[20]  Susan Kitchell.  Corporate culture, environmental adaptation, and innovation adoption: A qualitative/quantitative approach , 1995 .

[21]  A. Meyer.  Adapting to environmental jolts. , 1982, Administrative science quarterly.

[22]  Nancy J. Staples.  Job Design of Patternmakers in Apparel Manufacturing , 1993 .

[23]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Managerial Response to Changing Environments: Perspectives on Problem Sensing from Social Cognition. , 1982 .

[24]  R. Heath,et al.  Issues Management , 1985 .

[25]  John P. Kotter,et al.  Managing External Dependence , 1979 .

[26]  Doris H. Kincade.  Quick Response Management System for the Apparel Industry: Definition through Technologies , 1995 .

[27]  Sal Kukalis,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF STRATEGIC PLANNING SYSTEMS IN LARGE ORGANIZATIONS: A CONTINGENCY APPROACH* , 1991 .

[28]  R. Daft,et al.  Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems , 1984 .

[29]  D. A. Cowan.  Developing a Process Model of Problem Recognition , 1986 .

[30]  J. Slocum,et al.  Individual Characteristics as Sources of Perceived Uncertainty Variability , 1977 .

[31]  Kitty G. Dickerson,et al.  A State Apparel Industry Needs Assessment: Special Concerns for Rural Economies , 1991 .

[32]  Nancy L. Cassill,et al.  The Quick Response Management System: Structure and Components for the Apparel Industry , 1993 .

[33]  Frances J. Milliken.  Three Types of Perceived Uncertainty About the Environment: State, Effect, and Response Uncertainty , 1987 .

[34]  Charles L. Hulin,et al.  Organizational technologies: Effects on organizations' characteristics and individuals' responses. , 1985 .

[35]  M. Porter.  How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy , 1989 .

[36]  Frances J. Milliken.  Perceiving and interpreting environmental change: An examination of college administrators''interpre , 1990 .

[37]  D. Dillman,et al.  Mail and telephone surveys , 1978 .