A cell‐free testing platform to screen chemicals of potential neurotoxic concern across twenty vertebrate species

There is global demand for new in vitro testing tools for ecological risk assessment. The objective of the present study was to apply a set of cell-free neurochemical assays to screen many chemicals across many species in a relatively high-throughput manner. The platform assessed 7 receptors and enzymes that mediate neurotransmission of γ-aminobutyric acid, dopamine, glutamate, and acetylcholine. Each assay was optimized to work across 20 vertebrate species (5 fish, 5 birds, 7 mammalian wildlife, 3 biomedical species including humans). We tested the screening assay platform against 80 chemicals (23 pharmaceuticals and personal care products, 20 metal[loid]s, 22 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and halogenated organic compounds, 15 pesticides). In total, 10 800 species-chemical-assay combinations were tested, and significant differences were found in 4041 cases. All 7 assays were significantly affected by at least one chemical in each species tested. Among the 80 chemicals tested, nearly all resulted in a significant impact on at least one species and one assay. The 5 most active chemicals were prochloraz, HgCl2 , Sn, benzo[a]pyrene, and vinclozolin. Clustering analyses revealed groupings according to chemicals, species, and chemical-assay combinations. The results show that cell-free assays can screen a large number of samples in a short period of time in a cost-effective manner in a range of animals not easily studied using traditional approaches. Strengths and limitations of this approach are discussed, as well as next steps. Environ Toxicol Chem 2017;36:3081-3090. © 2017 SETAC.

[1]  H. Chan,et al.  An interspecies comparison of mercury inhibition on muscarinic acetylcholine receptor binding in the cerebral cortex and cerebellum. , 2005, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[2]  E. Thurman,et al.  Pharmaceuticals, hormones, and other organic wastewater contaminants in U.S. streams, 1999-2000: a national reconnaissance. , 2002 .

[3]  J. Giesy,et al.  Sensitivity of early life stages of white sturgeon, rainbow trout, and fathead minnow to copper , 2012, Ecotoxicology.

[4]  Melvin E Andersen,et al.  Defining and modeling known adverse outcome pathways: Domoic acid and neuronal signaling as a case study , 2011, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[5]  David M. Reif,et al.  Activity profiles of 309 ToxCast™ chemicals evaluated across 292 biochemical targets. , 2011, Toxicology.

[6]  T. Cooley,et al.  Mercury exposure and neurochemical impacts in bald eagles across several Great Lakes states , 2011, Ecotoxicology.

[7]  M. Hewitt,et al.  Pulp and paper mill effluents contain neuroactive substances that potentially disrupt neuroendocrine control of fish reproduction. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  F. Collins,et al.  Transforming Environmental Health Protection , 2008, Science.

[9]  A. Venturino,et al.  Time course of brain cholinesterase inhibition and recovery following acute and subacute azinphosmethyl, parathion and carbaryl exposure in the goldfish (Carassius auratus). , 2004, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[10]  R. Judson,et al.  The Toxicity Data Landscape for Environmental Chemicals , 2008, Environmental health perspectives.

[11]  T. Slotkin,et al.  In vitro models reveal differences in the developmental neurotoxicity of an environmental polycylic aromatic hydrocarbon mixture compared to benzo[a]pyrene: Neuronotypic PC12 Cells and embryonic neural stem cells. , 2017, Toxicology.

[12]  P. Eyer,et al.  Human Parathion Poisoning , 2003, Toxicological reviews.

[13]  Robert J Kavlock,et al.  Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: Implications for Human Health Risk Assessment , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[14]  N. Basu,et al.  Methylmercury egg injections: part 2--pathology, neurochemistry, and behavior in the avian embryo and hatchling. , 2013, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[15]  N. Basu,et al.  Mercury but not Organochlorines Inhibits Muscarinic Cholinergic Receptor Binding in the Cerebrum of Ringed Seals (Phoca hispida) , 2006, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A.

[16]  Robert J Kavlock,et al.  Predictive models of prenatal developmental toxicity from ToxCast high-throughput screening data. , 2011, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[17]  S. Kennedy,et al.  Key amino acids in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor predict dioxin sensitivity in avian species. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  M. Mills,et al.  In vivo and In vitro neurochemical-based assessments of wastewater effluents from the Maumee River area of concern. , 2016, Environmental pollution.

[19]  Daniel L Villeneuve,et al.  Vision & strategy: Predictive ecotoxicology in the 21st century , 2011, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[20]  David M. Reif,et al.  In Vitro Screening of Environmental Chemicals for Targeted Testing Prioritization: The ToxCast Project , 2009, Environmental health perspectives.