Modified Stencil Approximations for Fifth-Order Weighted Essentially Non-oscillatory Schemes

In this paper, a modified fifth-order weighted essentially non-oscillatory (WENO) finite difference scheme is presented. The quadratic polynomial approximation of numerical flux on each candidate stencil of the traditional WENO-JS scheme is modified by adding a form of cubic terms such that the resulting stencil approximation achieves fourth-order accuracy. And the corresponding smoothness indicators are calculated. The modified candidate fluxes and local smoothness indicators, when used in the WENO-JS scheme, can make the resulting new scheme (called WENO-MS) achieve fifth-order convergence in smooth regions including first-order critical points. A series of one- and two-dimensional numerical examples are presented to demonstrate the performance of the new scheme. The numerical results show that the proposed WENO-MS scheme provides a comparable or higher resolution of fine structures compared with the WENO-M, WENO-Z and P-WENO schemes, while it increases only 7% of CPU time compared with the traditional WENO-JS scheme.

[1]  P. Woodward,et al.  The numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluid flow with strong shocks , 1984 .

[2]  Wai-Sun Don,et al.  An improved weighted essentially non-oscillatory scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[3]  Sergio Pirozzoli,et al.  Conservative Hybrid Compact-WENO Schemes for Shock-Turbulence Interaction , 2002 .

[4]  Wai-Sun Don,et al.  High order weighted essentially non-oscillatory WENO-Z schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws , 2011, J. Comput. Phys..

[5]  P. Lax.  Weak solutions of nonlinear hyperbolic equations and their numerical computation , 1954 .

[6]  Jungho Yoon,et al.  Modified Non-linear Weights for Fifth-Order Weighted Essentially Non-oscillatory Schemes , 2016, J. Sci. Comput..

[7]  F. ARÀNDIGA,et al.  Analysis of WENO Schemes for Full and Global Accuracy , 2011, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[8]  A. Harten.  High Resolution Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws , 2017 .

[9]  S. Osher,et al.  Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes,II , 1989 .

[10]  S. Osher,et al.  Uniformly high order accurate essentially non-oscillatory schemes, 111 , 1987 .

[11]  James P. Collins,et al.  Numerical Solution of the Riemann Problem for Two-Dimensional Gas Dynamics , 1993, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[12]  Yeon Ju Lee,et al.  An improved weighted essentially non-oscillatory scheme with a new smoothness indicator , 2013, J. Comput. Phys..

[13]  J. M. Powers,et al.  Mapped weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes: Achieving optimal order near critical points , 2005 .

[14]  S. Osher,et al.  Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes , 1994 .

[15]  Chi-Wang Shu,et al.  Efficient Implementation of Weighted ENO Schemes , 1995 .

[16]  G. Sod.  A survey of several finite difference methods for systems of nonlinear hyperbolic conservation laws , 1978 .

[17]  Wai-Sun Don,et al.  Accuracy of the weighted essentially non-oscillatory conservative finite difference schemes , 2013, J. Comput. Phys..

[18]  David H. Sharp,et al.  The dynamics of bubble growth for Rayleigh-Taylor unstable interfaces , 1987 .

[19]  Shengping Liu,et al.  A perturbational weighted essentially non-oscillatory scheme , 2018, Computers & Fluids.

[20]  Chi-Wang Shu.  Essentially non-oscillatory and weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws , 1998 .