Regional differences of CO2 emissions performance in China’s agricultural sector: A Malmquist index approach

This study attempts to employ the Malmquist index approach to evaluate the energy-related CO2 emissions performance of China’s agricultural sector. The evaluation is based on the application of Data envelopment analysis (DEA) model, using the environmental production technology that allows for desirable outputs and undesirable outputs in the production process. The study covers the period 2003–2010 and thirty provincial regions. The values of the Malmquist index and their corresponding components (technical efficiency change and technological progress change) are derived from the distance function. Empirical results show that the average annual growth of the Malmquist index, accounting for the undesirable output CO2, is 6%, and the aggregated growth of the Malmquist index is approximately 48.5%. Additionally, the two components indices help to clarify the role played by technical efficiency change and technological progress change in the final performance. Moreover, in order to illustrate the differences in CO2 emissions performance of the different regions in China, we employ the Theil index methodology for decomposing the Malmquist index in per unit CO2 emissions and provide further analysis.

[1]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Data envelopment scenario analysis for setting targets to electricity generating plants , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Slack-adjusted DEA for time series analysis: Performance measurement of Japanese electric power generation industry in 1984-1993 , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Vicent Alcántara,et al.  Inequality of energy intensities across OECD countries: a note , 2004 .

[4]  Holger Scheel,et al.  Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuations , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  J. Duro,et al.  Explanatory Factors Of Co2 Per Capita Emission Inequality In The European Union , 2013 .

[6]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Total factor carbon emission performance: A Malmquist index analysis , 2010 .

[7]  A. Shorrocks,et al.  The Class of Additively Decomposable Inequality Measures , 1980 .

[8]  Emilio Padilla,et al.  CO2 EMISSIONS DISTRIBUTION IN CLIMATE CHANGE INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT MODELLING , 2007 .

[9]  D. A. de Ree,et al.  Allocating CO2 emission to customers on a distribution route , 2015 .

[10]  Behrouz Arabi,et al.  A new slacks-based measure of Malmquist–Luenberger index in the presence of undesirable outputs , 2015 .

[11]  Bian Yi-wen.  Eco-efficiency evaluation of non-cooperative game two-stage production system , 2012 .

[12]  L. Groot.  Carbon Lorenz curves , 2010 .

[13]  Jin-Li Hu,et al.  Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in China , 2006 .

[14]  Michael G. Pollitt,et al.  The necessity of distinguishing weak and strong disposability among undesirable outputs in DEA: Environmental performance of Chinese coal-fired power plants , 2010 .

[15]  Emilio Padilla,et al.  Inequality in CO2 emissions across countries and its relationship with income inequality: A distributive approach , 2006 .

[16]  Ramakrishnan Ramanathan,et al.  Combining indicators of energy consumption and CO 2 emissions: a cross-country comparison , 2002 .

[17]  Quentin Wodon,et al.  Future Inequality in CO2 Emissions and the Impact of Abatement Proposals , 2000 .

[18]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Productivity and Undesirable Outputs: A Directional Distance Function Approach , 1995 .

[19]  Feng Yang,et al.  Resource and environment efficiency analysis of provinces in China: A DEA approach based on Shannon’s entropy , 2010 .

[20]  Jin-Li Hu,et al.  Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in Japan , 2008 .

[21]  S. Malmquist.  Index numbers and indifference surfaces , 1953 .

[22]  Yan Li,et al.  Carbon inequality at the sub-national scale: A case study of provincial-level inequality in CO2 emissions in China 1997-2007 , 2011 .

[23]  Andrés J. Picazo-Tadeo,et al.  Assessing eco-efficiency with directional distance functions , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  M Molinos-Senante,et al.  Energy efficiency in Spanish wastewater treatment plants: a non-radial DEA approach. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[25]  José Luis Zofío,et al.  Environmental efficiency and regulatory standards: the case of CO2 emissions from OECD industries , 2001 .

[26]  A. Hailu,et al.  Non‐Parametric Productivity Analysis with Undesirable Outputs: An Application to the Canadian Pulp and Paper Industry , 2001 .

[27]  Osman Zaim,et al.  Environmental efficiency in carbon dioxide emissions in the OECD: A non-parametric approach , 2000 .

[28]  C. Lovell,et al.  Deregulation and productivity decline: the case of Spanish savings banks , 1996 .

[29]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Data envelopment analysis for environmental assessment: Comparison between public and private ownership in petroleum industry , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[30]  Fan Ying.  Evaluation of Carbon Emission Performance and Estimation of Marginal CO_2 Abatement Costs for Provinces of China:A Non-parametric Distance Function Approach , 2011 .

[31]  Kerui Du,et al.  Sources of the potential CO2 emission reduction in China: A nonparametric metafrontier approach , 2014 .

[32]  Jiansheng Qu,et al.  A quantitative comparison and analysis on the assessment indicators of greenhouse gases emission , 2008 .

[33]  Yang Wan-ping,et al.  The Total Factor Energy Efficiency Measurement of China Based on Environmental Pollution , 2009 .

[34]  R. Färe,et al.  Accounting for Air Pollution Emissions in Measures of State Manufacturing Productivity Growth , 2001 .

[35]  Wei Zhang,et al.  China's regional energy and environmental efficiency: A DEA window analysis based dynamic evaluation , 2013, Math. Comput. Model..

[36]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[37]  M. Farrell.  The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[38]  Ramakrishnan Ramanathan,et al.  A multi-factor efficiency perspective to the relationships among world GDP, energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions , 2006 .

[39]  Ming-Miin Yu,et al.  The enhanced Russell-based directional distance measure with undesirable outputs: Numerical example considering CO2 emissions , 2015 .

[40]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Measuring environmental performance under different environmental DEA technologies , 2008 .

[41]  G. Boyd,et al.  Plant Level Productivity, Efficiency, and Environmental Performance of the Container Glass Industry , 2002 .

[42]  Gongbing Bi,et al.  Carbon Emissions Abatement (CEA) allocation and compensation schemes based on DEA , 2015 .

[43]  Osman Zaim,et al.  Measuring environmental performance of state manufacturing through changes in pollution intensities: a DEA framework , 2004 .

[44]  M. Kortelainen,et al.  Dynamic environmental performance analysis: A Malmquist index approach , 2008 .

[45]  Zhou Peng.  Regional carbon dioxide emission performance and its reduction potential based on environmental production technology: the case of main industrial provinces in China , 2011 .

[46]  Boqiang Lin,et al.  Analyzing inter-factor substitution and technical progress in the Chinese agricultural sector , 2015 .

[47]  Zhou De-qun,et al.  Research on Dynamic Carbon Dioxide Emissions Performance, Regional Disparity and Affecting Factors in China , 2010 .

[48]  Hanifreza Motamed Shariati,et al.  Comparison of energy consumption and GHG emissions of open field and greenhouse strawberry production , 2014 .

[49]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Slacks-based efficiency measures for modeling environmental performance , 2006 .

[50]  Russell Pittman,et al.  Multilateral Productivity Comparisons with Undesirable Outputs , 1983 .

[51]  José Goldemberg,et al.  Communication The evolution of the "carbonization index" in developing countries , 1999 .

[52]  Sabuj Kumar Mandal,et al.  Do undesirable output and environmental regulation matter in energy efficiency analysis? Evidence from Indian Cement Industry , 2010 .

[53]  Yanrui Wu,et al.  China’s Capital Stock Series by Region and Sector , 2016 .

[54]  Boqiang Lin,et al.  Energy and CO2 emissions performance in China's regional economies: Do market-oriented reforms matter? , 2015 .

[55]  Per Joakim Agrell,et al.  Economic and environmental efficiency of district heating plants , 2005 .

[56]  D. Shi.  Regional Differences in China’s Energy Efficiency and Conservation Potentials , 2008 .

[57]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[58]  F. Hernández-Sancho,et al.  Directional distance functions and environmental regulation , 2005 .

[59]  L. Hai-peng.  Research on Spatial-temporal Characteristics and Affecting Factors Decomposition of Agricultural Carbon Emission in China , 2011 .

[60]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Environmental production functions and environmental directional distance functions , 2007 .

[61]  Surender Kumar,et al.  Environmentally Sensitive Productivity Growth: A Global Analysis Using Malmquist-Luenberger Index , 2006 .

[62]  Sebastián Lozano,et al.  Non-parametric frontier approach to modelling the relationships among population, GDP, energy consumption and CO2 emissions , 2008 .

[63]  G. Battese,et al.  Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios , 2008 .

[64]  Lei Zhu,et al.  Evaluation of potential reductions in carbon emissions in Chinese provinces based on environmental DEA , 2011 .

[65]  J. Duro,et al.  International inequalities in per capita CO2 emissions: A decomposition methodology by Kaya factors , 2006 .

[66]  Tser-yieth Chen,et al.  A comparative study of energy utilization efficiency between Taiwan and China , 2010 .

[67]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Is the energy intensity a less useful indicator than the carbon factor in the study of climate change , 1999 .

[68]  L. R. Christensen,et al.  MULTILATERAL COMPARISONS OF OUTPUT, INPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY USING SUPERLATIVE INDEX NUMBERS* , 1982 .

[69]  Daniel Tyteca,et al.  On the Measurement of the Environmental Performance of Firms— A Literature Review and a Productive Efficiency Perspective , 1996 .

[70]  J. Sun.  The decrease of CO2 emission intensity is decarbonization at national and global levels , 2005 .

[71]  Jin-Li Hu,et al.  Efficient energy-saving targets for APEC economies , 2007 .

[72]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries , 1994 .