A new method to evaluate image quality of CBCT images quantitatively without observers.

OBJECTIVES To develop an observer-free method for quantitatively evaluating the image quality of CBCT images by applying just-noticeable difference (JND). METHODS We used two test objects: (1) a Teflon (polytetrafluoroethylene) plate phantom attached to a dry human mandible; and (2) a block phantom consisting of a Teflon step phantom and an aluminium step phantom. These phantoms had holes with different depths. They were immersed in water and scanned with a CB MercuRay (Hitachi Medical Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) at tube voltages of 120 kV, 100 kV, 80 kV and 60 kV. Superimposed images of the phantoms with holes were used for evaluation. The number of detectable holes was used as an index of image quality. In detecting holes quantitatively, the threshold grey value (ΔG), which differentiated holes from the background, was calculated using a specific threshold (the JND), and we extracted the holes with grey values above ΔG. The indices obtained by this quantitative method (the extracted hole values) were compared with the observer evaluations (the observed hole values). In addition, the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the shallowest detectable holes and the deepest undetectable holes were measured to evaluate the contribution of CNR to detectability. RESULTS The results of this evaluation method corresponded almost exactly with the evaluations made by observers. The extracted hole values reflected the influence of different tube voltages. All extracted holes had an area with a CNR of ≥1.5. CONCLUSIONS This quantitative method of evaluating CBCT image quality may be more useful and less time-consuming than evaluation by observation.

[1]  U Welander,et al.  Prediction of perceptibility curves of direct digital intraoral radiographic systems. , 1999, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[2]  T. Sano,et al.  Comparison between cone-beam CT and multidetector-row CT by ROC analysis regarding diagnostic accuracy for artificial alveolar bone defects in the mandibular molar region , 2015, Oral Radiology.

[3]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  Technical aspects of dental CBCT: state of the art. , 2015, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[4]  M. Noujeim,et al.  Contrast-to-noise ratio with different large volumes in a cone-beam computerized tomography machine: an in vitro study. , 2012, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology.

[5]  K. Tokumori,et al.  Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 1: phantom validity. , 1999, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[6]  K. Tokumori,et al.  Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 2: optimum exposure conditions for detection of small mass changes in 6 intraoral radiography systems. , 1999, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[7]  U Welander,et al.  The perceptibility curve test applied to direct digital dental radiography. , 1998, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[8]  Icrp Chapters 3 and 4 , 2007 .

[9]  D. Schulze,et al.  Effective dose span of ten different cone beam CT devices. , 2013, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[10]  K Araki,et al.  Characteristics of a newly developed dentomaxillofacial X-ray cone beam CT scanner (CB MercuRay): system configuration and physical properties. , 2004, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[11]  T. Goto,et al.  Correlation between diagnostic accuracy and perceptibility. , 2005, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[12]  D Brüllmann,et al.  Spatial resolution in CBCT machines for dental/maxillofacial applications-what do we know today? , 2015, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[13]  K. Horner,et al.  Dose optimization by altering the operating potential and tube current exposure time product in dental cone beam CT: a systematic review. , 2016, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[14]  T. Goto,et al.  Effects of the automatic exposure compensation on the proximal caries diagnosis. , 2005, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[15]  H. Bosmans,et al.  A pragmatic approach to determine the optimal kVp in cone beam CT: balancing contrast-to-noise ratio and radiation dose. , 2014, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[16]  H. Bosmans,et al.  Optimization of dental CBCT exposures through mAs reduction. , 2015, Dento maxillo facial radiology.