The Boston Keratoprosthesis Type I in Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid

Purpose: To evaluate the use of the Boston keratoprosthesis type I implantation in patients with mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP). Methods: Retrospective review of 8 eyes of 8 patients with severe ocular surface disease and corneal blindness as a result of MMP who underwent Boston keratoprosthesis type I implantation at the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2009. The main outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity, keratoprosthesis retention, and postoperative complications. Results: The mean age of patients was 71.3 years (range, 55–94 years), and the mean duration of their disease preoperatively was 6.1 years (range, 1.7–11.4 years). Visual acuity after the surgery improved to 20/200 or better in 6 eyes (75%) and to 20/40 or better in 3 eyes (37.5%). Only 1 of 6 eyes (16.7%) was able to maintain visual acuity of 20/200 or better over a mean follow-up period of 3.2 years. Five of the 8 Boston keratoprosthesis type I devices (62.5%) extruded or had to be replaced during a mean follow-up time of 1.7 ± 1.7 years. Loss of vision to worse than 20/200 during the follow-up period occurred because of keratoprosthesis type I extrusion, end-stage glaucoma, and retinal or choroidal detachment. Conclusions: The clinical outcomes of Boston keratoprosthesis type I implantation in MMP are guarded and, as judged from the literature, less favorable than those with the Boston keratoprosthesis type II for the same disease.

[1]  F. Yu,et al.  International results with the Boston type I keratoprosthesis. , 2012, Ophthalmology.

[2]  Claes H Dohlman,et al.  The Boston Keratoprosthesis Type II: The Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary Experience , 2011, Cornea.

[3]  F. Jakobiec,et al.  Ocular Cicatricial Pemphigoid: A Review of Clinical Features, Immunopathology, Differential Diagnosis, and Current Management , 2011, Seminars in ophthalmology.

[4]  S. Sel,et al.  Impact of clinical factors on the long-term functional and anatomic outcomes of osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis and tibial bone keratoprosthesis. , 2011, American journal of ophthalmology.

[5]  P. Padmanabhan,et al.  Modified Osteo-Odonto Keratoprosthesis-The Indian Experience-Results of the First 50 Cases , 2010, Cornea.

[6]  E. Cohen,et al.  Boston Keratoprosthesis Outcomes and Complications , 2009, Cornea.

[7]  M. Durand,et al.  Successful Prevention of Bacterial Endophthalmitis in Eyes with the Boston Keratoprosthesis , 2009, Cornea.

[8]  I. Schwab,et al.  Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis: The University of California Davis Experience , 2009, Cornea.

[9]  Y. Shimomura,et al.  Osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis in Japan. , 2008, Cornea.

[10]  R. Tandon,et al.  Visual rehabilitation in end-stage inflammatory ocular surface disease with the osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis: results from the UK , 2008, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[11]  R. Michael,et al.  Long-term functional and anatomical results of osteo- and osteoodonto-keratoprosthesis , 2008, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[12]  Ling-Ling Chan,et al.  Keratoprosthesis surgery for end-stage corneal blindness in asian eyes. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[13]  D. Tan,et al.  Keratoprosthesis surgery. , 2008, Developments in ophthalmology.

[14]  R. Pineda,et al.  Outcomes of Boston keratoprosthesis in aniridia: a retrospective multicenter study. , 2007, American journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  Danish M. Khan,et al.  Advances in Boston Keratoprosthesis: Enhancing Retention and Prevention of Infection and Inflammation , 2007, International ophthalmology clinics.

[16]  M. Belin,et al.  Results from the multicenter Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis Study. , 2006, Ophthalmology.

[17]  David W. Miller,et al.  Smolin and Thoft's The Cornea , 2006 .

[18]  K. Ruprecht,et al.  Medium term results in keratoprostheses with biocompatible and biological haptic , 2006, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[19]  Benedetto Falsini,et al.  Modified osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis for treatment of corneal blindness: long-term anatomical and functional outcomes in 181 cases. , 2005, Archives of ophthalmology.

[20]  B. Khan,et al.  Management of vitreoretinal complications in eyes with permanent keratoprosthesis. , 2002, Archives of ophthalmology.

[21]  D. West,et al.  The first international consensus on mucous membrane pemphigoid: definition, diagnostic criteria, pathogenic factors, medical treatment, and prognostic indicators. , 2002, Archives of dermatology.

[22]  B. Khan,et al.  Keratoprosthesis: an update , 2001, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[23]  M. Durand,et al.  Endophthalmitis after keratoprosthesis: incidence, bacterial causes, and risk factors. , 2001, Archives of ophthalmology.

[24]  M. Doane,et al.  Keratoprosthesis: Preoperative Prognostic Categories , 2001, Cornea.

[25]  A. Kampik,et al.  [Ocular cicatricial pemphigoid. Retrospective analysis of risk factors and complications]. , 2000, Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft.

[26]  A. Kampik,et al.  Okuläres vernarbendes Pemphigoid Retrospektive Analyse von Risikofaktoren und Komplikationen , 2000, Der Ophthalmologe.

[27]  M. Doane,et al.  Fabrication of a Keratoprosthesis , 1996, Cornea.

[28]  C. Foster,et al.  Penetrating keratoplasty in cicatrizing conjunctival diseases. , 1995, Ophthalmology.