Making use of harvest information to examine alternative management scenarios: a body weight‐structured model for wild boar

Summary 1. Harvest models are often built to explore the sustainability of the dynamics of exploited populations and to help evaluate hunting management scenarios. Age-structured models are commonly used for ungulate population dynamics. However, the age of hunted individuals is usually not recorded, and hunting data often only include body weight and sex limiting the usefulness of traditional models. 2. We propose a new modelling approach that fits data collected by hunters to develop management rules when age is not available. Using wild boar Sus scrofa scrofa as a case study, we built a matrix model structured according to sex and body weight whose output can be directly compared with the observed distribution of hunted individuals among sex and body weight classes. 3. In the face of the current wide scale increase in populations of wild boar, the best feasible option to stop or slow down population growth involves targeting the hunting effort to specific sex and body weight classes. The optimal harvest proportion in the target body weight classes is estimated using sensitivity analyses. 4. The number of individuals shot in each sex and body weight class predicted by our model was closely associated with those recorded in the hunting bag. Increasing the hunting pressure on medium-sized females by 14·6% was the best option to limit growth rate to a target of 0·90. 5. Synthesis and applications. We demonstrate that targeting hunting effort to specific body weight classes could reliably control population growth. Our modelling approach can be applied to any game species where group composition, phenotypic traits or coat colour allows hunters to easily identify sex and body weight classes. This offers a promising tool for applying selective hunting to the management of game species.

[1]  M. Moretti BIOMETRIC DATA AND GROWTH RATES OF A MOUNTAIN POPULATION OF WILD BOAR (Sus scrofa L.), TICINO, SWITZERLAND , 2014 .

[2]  Stephen L. Webb,et al.  Effects of selective harvest on antler size in white‐tailed deer: A modeling approach , 2012 .

[3]  Olivier Gimenez,et al.  HIGH HUNTING PRESSURE SELECTS FOR EARLIER BIRTH DATE: WILD BOAR AS A CASE STUDY , 2011, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[4]  Carl von Linné Systema Naturae: Per Regna Tria Naturae, Secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species, Cum Characteribus, Differentiis, Synonymis, Locis, , 2011 .

[5]  Olivier Gimenez,et al.  Influence of harvesting pressure on demographic tactics: implications for wildlife management. , 2011 .

[6]  Roberto Salguero-Gómez,et al.  Matrix projection models meet variation in the real world , 2010 .

[7]  R. Andersen,et al.  European ungulates and their management in the 21st century , 2010 .

[8]  Roger Pradel,et al.  U‐CARE: Utilities for performing goodness of fit tests and manipulating CApture–REcapture data , 2009 .

[9]  Gaillard Jean-Michel,et al.  Pulsed resources and climate-induced variation in the reproductive traits of wild boar under high hunting pressure. , 2009, The Journal of animal ecology.

[10]  F. Allendorf,et al.  In the Light of Evolution III: Two Centuries of Darwin Sackler Colloquium: Human-induced evolution caused by unnatural selection through harvest of wild animals , 2009 .

[11]  Christopher C. Wilmers,et al.  Human predators outpace other agents of trait change in the wild , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Roger Pradel,et al.  Program E-Surge: A Software Application for Fitting Multievent Models , 2009 .

[13]  J. Nichols,et al.  Chapter 3 Modeling Individual Animal Histories with Multistate Capture–Recapture Models , 2009 .

[14]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Disentangling Natural From Hunting Mortality in an Intensively Hunted Wild Boar Population , 2008, The Journal of Wildlife Management.

[15]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Managing Large Herbivores in Theory and Practice: Is the Game the Same for Browsing and Grazing Species , 2008 .

[16]  O. Gimenez,et al.  Use of Integrated Modeling to Enhance Estimates of Population Dynamics Obtained from Limited Data , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[17]  Shripad Tuljapurkar,et al.  The Evolutionary Demography of Ecological Change: Linking Trait Variation and Population Growth , 2007, Science.

[18]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Litter size and fetal sex ratio adjustment in a highly polytocous species: the wild boar , 2007 .

[19]  J. Nichols,et al.  Monitoring for conservation. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[20]  C. Melis,et al.  Biogeographical variation in the population density of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in western Eurasia , 2006 .

[21]  A. Hastings,et al.  Persistence of spatial populations depends on returning home. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  J. Lebreton Age, stages, and the role of generation time in matrix models , 2005 .

[23]  Jean-Michel Gaillard,et al.  Generation Time: A Reliable Metric to Measure Life‐History Variation among Mammalian Populations , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[24]  Jean-Dominique Lebreton,et al.  DYNAMICAL AND STATISTICAL MODELS FOR EXPLOITED POPULATIONS † , 2005 .

[25]  Gwenaël Kaminski,et al.  Life-history patterns in female wild boars (Sus scrofa): mother-daughter postweaning associations , 2005 .

[26]  J. Gaillard,et al.  TEMPORAL VARIATION IN SURVIVAL OF MAMMALS: A CASE OF ENVIRONMENTAL CANALIZATION? , 2003 .

[27]  Robert P. Freckleton,et al.  Predicting the impacts of harvesting using structured population models: the importance of density‐dependence and timing of harvest for a tropical palm tree , 2003 .

[28]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[29]  Roger Pradel,et al.  A Proposal for a Goodness‐of‐Fit Test to the Arnason‐Schwarz Multisite Capture‐Recapture Model , 2003, Biometrics.

[30]  T. L. Brown,et al.  Deer populations up, hunter populations down: Implications of interdependence of deer and hunter population dynamics on management , 2003 .

[31]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Large Herbivores in European Alpine Ecosystems: Current Status and Challenges for the Future , 2003 .

[32]  P Besbeas,et al.  Integrating Mark–Recapture–Recovery and Census Data to Estimate Animal Abundance and Demographic Parameters , 2002, Biometrics.

[33]  M. Conroy,et al.  Analysis and Management of Animal Populations , 2002 .

[34]  J. Lebreton,et al.  Optimizing removals to control a metapopulation: application to the yellow legged herring gull (Larus cachinnans) , 2001 .

[35]  R. Lancia,et al.  Hunting statistics: what data for what use? An account of an international workshop , 2001 .

[36]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Temporal Variation in Fitness Components and Population Dynamics of Large Herbivores , 2000 .

[37]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  The relative roles of density and climatic variation on population dynamics and fecundity rates in three contrasting ungulate species , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  Roger Pradel,et al.  Competing events, mixtures of information and multistratum recapture models , 1999 .

[39]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Mass‐ and Density‐Dependent Reproductive Success and Reproductive Costs in a Capital Breeder , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[40]  W. McShea,et al.  Deer management and the concept of overabundance , 1997 .

[41]  E. Hazebroek,et al.  Ungulate Traffic Collisions in Europe , 1996 .

[42]  Jean Clobert,et al.  ULM, a software for conservation and evolutionary biologists , 1995 .

[43]  R. Kozak,et al.  Notes on regression through the origin , 1995 .

[44]  R. Beverton,et al.  On the Dynamics of Exploited Fish Populations , 1959, Fish & Fisheries Series.

[45]  L. Eberhardt Models of ungulate population dynamics , 1991 .

[46]  P. Holgate,et al.  Matrix Population Models. , 1990 .

[47]  H. A. Gordon Errors in Computer Packages. Least Squares Regression Through the Origin , 1981 .