The Mad2 Conformational Dimer: Structure and Implications for the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint

The 25 kDa Mad2 protein is a key player in the spindle assembly checkpoint, a safeguard against chromosome segregation errors in mitosis. Mad2 combines three unusual properties. First, Mad2 adopts two conformations with distinct topologies, open (O) and closed (C) Mad2. Second, C-Mad2 forms topological links with its two best-characterized protein ligands, Mad1 and Cdc20. Third, O-Mad2 and C-Mad2 engage in a "conformational" dimer that is essential for spindle checkpoint function in different organisms. The crystal structure of the O-Mad2-C-Mad2 conformational dimer, reported here, reveals an asymmetric interface that explains the selective dimerization of the O-Mad2 and C-Mad2 conformers. The structure also identifies several buried hydrophobic residues whose rearrangement correlates with the Mad2 topological change. The structure of the O-Mad2-C-Mad2 conformational dimer is consistent with a catalytic model in which a C-Mad2 template facilitates the binding of O-Mad2 to Cdc20, the target of Mad2 in the spindle checkpoint.

[1]  A. Murray,et al.  The spindle checkpoint of budding yeast depends on a tight complex between the Mad1 and Mad2 proteins. , 1999, Molecular biology of the cell.

[2]  E. Koonin,et al.  The HORMA domain: a common structural denominator in mitotic checkpoints, chromosome synapsis and DNA repair. , 1998, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[3]  Kim Nasmyth,et al.  How Do so Few Control so Many? , 2005, Cell.

[4]  K. Helin,et al.  Mad2 binding to Mad1 and Cdc20, rather than oligomerization, is required for the spindle checkpoint , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[5]  Viji M. Draviam,et al.  Anaphase initiation is regulated by antagonistic ubiquitination and deubiquitination activities , 2007, Nature.

[6]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Structure of the Mad2 spindle assembly checkpoint protein and its interaction with Cdc20 , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[7]  Rey-Huei Chen,et al.  Spindle checkpoint requires Mad1-bound and Mad1-free Mad2. , 2002, Molecular biology of the cell.

[8]  A. Amon.  The spindle checkpoint. , 1999, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[9]  J. Rizo,et al.  The Mad2 spindle checkpoint protein has two distinct natively folded states , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[10]  J. Zou,et al.  Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models. , 1991, Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations of crystallography.

[11]  Stephen S. Taylor,et al.  The spindle checkpoint: a quality control mechanism which ensures accurate chromosome segregation , 2004, Chromosome Research.

[12]  John Kuriyan,et al.  An Allosteric Mechanism for Activation of the Kinase Domain of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor , 2006, Cell.

[13]  E. Salmon,et al.  The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time , 2007, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[14]  Andrea Musacchio,et al.  The Mad1/Mad2 Complex as a Template for Mad2 Activation in the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint , 2005, Current Biology.

[15]  L. Nezi,et al.  Determinants of conformational dimerization of Mad2 and its inhibition by p31comet , 2006, The EMBO journal.

[16]  A. Musacchio,et al.  Explaining the oligomerization properties of the spindle assembly checkpoint protein Mad2 , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  Hongtao Yu,et al.  The Mad2 spindle checkpoint protein undergoes similar major conformational changes upon binding to either Mad1 or Cdc20. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[18]  Andrea Musacchio,et al.  Crystal structure of the tetrameric Mad1–Mad2 core complex: implications of a ‘safety belt’ binding mechanism for the spindle checkpoint , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[19]  Z. Otwinowski,et al.  Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. , 1997, Methods in enzymology.

[20]  J. Harding,et al.  Achieving stability through editing and chaperoning: regulation of MHC class II peptide binding and expression , 2005, Immunological reviews.

[21]  Elliot Botvinick,et al.  Dynamics of Centromere and Kinetochore Proteins Implications for Checkpoint Signaling and Silencing , 2004, Current Biology.

[22]  E. Nigg,et al.  Role of Hec1 in Spindle Checkpoint Signaling and Kinetochore Recruitment of Mad1/Mad2 , 2002, Science.

[23]  Andrew W. Murray,et al.  Spindle Checkpoint Protein Xmad1 Recruits Xmad2 to Unattached Kinetochores , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[24]  Randy J Read,et al.  Simple algorithm for a maximum-likelihood SAD function. , 2004, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[25]  J. Whisstock,et al.  Molecular gymnastics: serpin structure, folding and misfolding. , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.

[26]  Richard J Morris,et al.  ARP/wARP's model-building algorithms. I. The main chain. , 2002, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[27]  E. Salmon,et al.  The dynamic kinetochore-microtubule interface , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[28]  J. R. Daum,et al.  Mammalian p55CDC Mediates Association of the Spindle Checkpoint Protein Mad2 with the Cyclosome/Anaphase-promoting Complex, and is Involved in Regulating Anaphase Onset and Late Mitotic Events , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[29]  Hongtao Yu.  Structural activation of Mad2 in the mitotic spindle checkpoint: the two-state Mad2 model versus the Mad2 template model , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.

[30]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Ubiquitination by the anaphase-promoting complex drives spindle checkpoint inactivation , 2007, Nature.

[31]  Kevin Cowtan,et al.  research papers Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological , 2005 .

[32]  J. Peters.  The anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome: a machine designed to destroy , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[33]  Collaborative Computational,et al.  The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. , 1994, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[34]  Tomohiro Matsumoto,et al.  Fission yeast Slp1: an effector of the Mad2-dependent spindle checkpoint. , 1998, Science.

[35]  J. Rizo,et al.  p31comet Blocks Mad2 Activation through Structural Mimicry , 2007, Cell.

[36]  A. Ciliberto,et al.  In Vitro FRAP Identifies the Minimal Requirements for Mad2 Kinetochore Dynamics , 2006, Current Biology.

[37]  Jerry H. Brown.  Breaking symmetry in protein dimers: Designs and functions , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[38]  E. Salmon,et al.  Inducing precocious anaphase in cultured mammalian cells. , 2002, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[39]  J. Rizo,et al.  Conformation‐specific binding of p31comet antagonizes the function of Mad2 in the spindle checkpoint , 2004, The EMBO journal.

[40]  Tomohiro Matsumoto,et al.  Identification of a MAD2‐binding protein, CMT2, and its role in mitosis , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[41]  L. Nezi,et al.  Accumulation of Mad2–Cdc20 complex during spindle checkpoint activation requires binding of open and closed conformers of Mad2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.

[42]  A. Murray,et al.  Budding yeast Cdc20: a target of the spindle checkpoint. , 1998, Science.

[43]  T. Schneider.  A genetic algorithm for the identification of conformationally invariant regions in protein molecules. , 2002, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.