Angiographic and clinical outcomes of patients treated with everolimus‐eluting bioresorbable stents in routine clinical practice: Results of the ISAR‐ABSORB registry

We aimed to analyze angiographic and clinical results of patients undergoing BRS implantation in a real‐world setting.

[1]  R. Jauhar,et al.  TCT-32 Prospective, Multi-Center Evaluation of the DESolve Novolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffold: Imaging Outcomes and 4-Year Clinical and Imaging Results. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  J. Brachmann,et al.  Beyond the early stages: insights from the ASSURE registry on bioresorbable vascular scaffolds. , 2015, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[3]  R. Whitbourn,et al.  The ABSORB EXTEND study: preliminary report of the twelve-month clinical outcomes in the first 512 patients enrolled. , 2015, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[4]  M. Togni,et al.  Comparison of everolimus- and biolimus-eluting coronary stents with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Percutaneous coronary intervention with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in routine clinical practice: early and midterm outcomes from the European multicentre GHOST-EU registry. , 2015, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[6]  J. Tijssen,et al.  Initial experience and clinical evaluation of the Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) in real-world practice: the AMC Single Centre Real World PCI Registry. , 2015, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[7]  P. Serruys,et al.  A bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffold versus a metallic everolimus-eluting stent for ischaemic heart disease caused by de-novo native coronary artery lesions (ABSORB II): an interim 1-year analysis of clinical and procedural secondary outcomes from a randomised controlled trial , 2015, The Lancet.

[8]  A. Kastrati,et al.  Bioresorbable drug-eluting stents: an immature technology in need of mature application. , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[9]  C. Hamm,et al.  Current status of bioresorbable scaffolds in the treatment of coronary artery disease. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  Helmut Baumgartner,et al.  2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous , 2014, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[11]  T. Lüscher,et al.  Feasibility of second-generation bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in complex anatomical and clinical scenarios , 2014, Clinical Research in Cardiology.

[12]  R. Whitbourn,et al.  Dynamics of vessel wall changes following the implantation of the absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold: a multi-imaging modality study at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months. , 2014, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[13]  T. Münzel,et al.  Early outcome after implantation of Absorb bioresorbable drug-eluting scaffolds in patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2014, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[14]  Michael Joner,et al.  Risk of stent thrombosis among bare-metal stents, first-generation drug-eluting stents, and second-generation drug-eluting stents: results from a registry of 18,334 patients. , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[15]  G. Stone,et al.  Everolimus-eluting stents in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: final 3-year results of the Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Subjects With de Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions trial. , 2013, American heart journal.

[16]  M. Joner,et al.  Incidence and predictors of restenosis after coronary stenting in 10 004 patients with surveillance angiography , 2013, Heart.

[17]  Bernard Chevalier,et al.  First Serial Assessment at 6 Months and 2 Years of the Second Generation of Absorb Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold: A Multi-Imaging Modality Study , 2012, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[18]  Soo-Jin Kang,et al.  In-stent neoatherosclerosis: a final common pathway of late stent failure. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  P. Serruys,et al.  Very Late Coronary Stent Thrombosis of a Newer-Generation Everolimus-Eluting Stent Compared With Early-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents: A Prospective Cohort Study , 2012, Circulation.

[20]  Helmut Baumgartner,et al.  ESC / EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization , 2014 .

[21]  M. Joner,et al.  Polymer coatings and delayed arterial healing following drug-eluting stent implantation. , 2009, Minerva cardioangiologica.

[22]  Michael Joner,et al.  Pathology of drug-eluting stents in humans: delayed healing and late thrombotic risk. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  H. Hecht,et al.  Lesion morphology and coronary angioplasty: current experience and analysis. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.