Sparse calibration of an extreme Adaptive Optics system

Adaptive optics systems are extensively used in astronomy to obtain high resolution pictures of stars and galaxies with ground telescopes. The crucial point is to shape deformable mirrors in order to compensate for the incoming wave distorted by the atmospheric turbulence. The calibration of the system is the cornerstone to obtain good performance. The next generation of adaptive optics system, eXtreme Adaptive Optics (XAO), will have a very large number of actuators and sensors (∼ 104) in order to guarantee high Strehl ratio and contrast levels; as such computational burden could become a serious bottleneck. For this reason several iterative methods have been proposed in the last decade. Since convergence and computational complexity of these methods depend on the sparsity of the interaction matrix (matrix projecting commands into measurements), the problem of calibrating an XAO system forcing the interaction matrix to be as sparse as possible is clearly important. In this paper we propose a method based on the LASSO regression algorithm that solves efficiently this problem.

[1]  Jianqing Fan,et al.  Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties , 2001 .

[2]  Jean-Pierre Véran,et al.  Fourier transform wavefront control with adaptive prediction of the atmosphere. , 2007, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[3]  Yousef Saad,et al.  Iterative methods for sparse linear systems , 2003 .

[4]  Terence Tao,et al.  The Dantzig selector: Statistical estimation when P is much larger than n , 2005, math/0506081.

[5]  Francois Roddier,et al.  Adaptive Optics in Astronomy: Imaging through the atmosphere , 2004 .

[6]  Emmanuel Aller-Carpentier,et al.  Segment phasing experiments on the High Order Test bench , 2010 .

[7]  S. Stroebele,et al.  Large DM AO systems: synthetic IM or calibration on sky? , 2006, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[8]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Least angle regression , 2004, math/0406456.

[9]  B. Welsh,et al.  Imaging Through Turbulence , 1996 .

[10]  Sylvain Oberti,et al.  High SNR measurement of interaction matrix on-sky and in lab , 2006, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[11]  Sergey Bakin,et al.  Adaptive regression and model selection in data mining problems , 1999 .

[12]  D. Madigan,et al.  [Least Angle Regression]: Discussion , 2004 .

[13]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[14]  Enrico Fedrigo,et al.  Real-time Control of ESO Adaptive Optics Systems (Echtzeitsteuerung der ESO Adaptive Optik Systeme) , 2005, Autom..

[15]  Qiang Yang,et al.  Fourier Domain Preconditioned Conjugate Gradient Algorithm for Atmospheric Tomography , 2005 .

[16]  D. Looze,et al.  Fast calibration of high-order adaptive optics systems. , 2004, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[17]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2001 .

[18]  Gordon D. Love,et al.  High order test bench for extreme adaptive optics system optimization , 2008, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[19]  Fang Shi,et al.  Sparse-matrix wavefront reconstruction: simulations and experiments , 2003, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.