High-Order Compact-Stencil Summation-By-Parts Operators for the Compressible Navier-Stokes Equations

A general framework is presented for deriving minimum-stencil high-order summationby-parts finite-difference operators for the second derivative with variable coefficients, for orders of accuracy 3 through 6. These operators can be used to construct time-stable numerical schemes with simultaneous approximation terms to weakly impose boundary conditions. The derivation of these operators leads to various free parameters which can be used for optimization of the operator about criteria such as spectral radius and truncation error. The operators are 2p accurate on the interior, where the interior stencil has 2p+1 nodes, but p accurate at the boundaries. Nonetheless, for purely parabolic problems, they can be shown to be p+2 globally accurate. However, for the Navier-Stokes equations, the continuity equation renders the method p + 1 accurate. We present a novel means of circumventing this degradation in accuracy by using p + 2 globally accurate operators for the continuity equation, and we prove that the new discretization remains amenable to the energy method, a necessary condition to prove time stability. Numerical tests on the one-dimensional linear convection-diffusion equation and the oneand three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations using the method of manufactured solutions are used for verification and characterization studies. We show that for the Navier-Stokes equations using a p+ 2 globally accurate first derivative for the continuity equation substantially increases the accuracy benefits of the minimum-stencil operator.

[1]  Ken Mattsson,et al.  Boundary Procedures for Summation-by-Parts Operators , 2003, J. Sci. Comput..

[2]  Erik Schnetter,et al.  Optimized High-Order Derivative and Dissipation Operators Satisfying Summation by Parts, and Applications in Three-dimensional Multi-block Evolutions , 2005, J. Sci. Comput..

[3]  David W. Zingg,et al.  Comparison of High-Accuracy Finite-Difference Methods for Linear Wave Propagation , 2000, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[4]  D. Zingg,et al.  A parallel Newton-Krylov-Schur flow solver for the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes equations , 2012 .

[5]  Jan Nordström,et al.  The Influence of Weak and Strong Solid Wall Boundary Conditions on the Convergence to Steady-State of the Navier-Stokes Equations , 2009 .

[6]  David W. Zingg,et al.  A High-Order Parallel Newton-Krylov Flow Solver for the Euler Equations , 2009 .

[7]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  Weak imposition of Dirichlet boundary conditions in fluid mechanics , 2007 .

[8]  Jan Nordström,et al.  High Order Finite Difference Approximations of Electromagnetic Wave Propagation Close to Material Discontinuities , 2003, J. Sci. Comput..

[9]  Ronald D. Joslin Discussion of DNS: Past, Present, and Future , 1997 .

[10]  D. Gottlieb,et al.  A Stable and Conservative Interface Treatment of Arbitrary Spatial Accuracy , 1999 .

[11]  Jason E. Hicken,et al.  Superconvergent Functional Estimates from Summation-By-Parts Finite-Difference Discretizations , 2011, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[12]  D. Gottlieb,et al.  A new method of imposing boundary conditions in pseudospectral approximations of hyperbolic equations , 1988 .

[13]  Magnus Svärd,et al.  Stable and Accurate Artificial Dissipation , 2004, J. Sci. Comput..

[14]  Jan Nordström,et al.  Boundary and Interface Conditions for High-Order Finite-Difference Methods Applied to the Euler and Navier-Stokes Equations , 1999 .

[15]  Jason E. Hicken,et al.  The Role of Dual Consistency in Functional Accuracy: Error Estimation and Superconvergence , 2011 .

[16]  Jan S. Hesthaven,et al.  A Stable Penalty Method for the Compressible Navier-Stokes Equations: III. Multidimensional Domain Decomposition Schemes , 1998, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[17]  Hantaek Bae Navier-Stokes equations , 1992 .

[18]  Magnus Svärd,et al.  Stable and accurate schemes for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[19]  H. Kreiss,et al.  Comparison of accurate methods for the integration of hyperbolic equations , 1972 .

[20]  Jan Nordström,et al.  High-order finite difference methods, multidimensional linear problems, and curvilinear coordinates , 2001 .

[21]  P. Olsson,et al.  A High Order Finite Difference Scheme with Sharp Shock Resolution for the Euler Equations , 1996 .

[22]  Björn Sjögreen,et al.  ON TENTH-ORDER CENTRAL SPATIAL SCHEMES , 2007, Proceeding of Fifth International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena.

[23]  Ken Mattsson,et al.  Summation by Parts Operators for Finite Difference Approximations of Second-Derivatives with Variable Coefficients , 2012, J. Sci. Comput..

[24]  Jing Gong,et al.  A stable and conservative high order multi-block method for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations , 2009, J. Comput. Phys..

[25]  B. Strand Summation by parts for finite difference approximations for d/dx , 1994 .

[26]  J. Nordström,et al.  Summation by Parts Operators for Finite Difference Approximations of Second-Derivatives with Variable Coefficients , 2004, Journal of Scientific Computing.

[27]  Carl De Boor,et al.  Mathematical aspects of finite elements in partial differential equations : proceedings of a symposium conducted by the Mathematics Research Center, the University of Wisconsin--Madison, April 1-3, 1974 , 1974 .

[28]  Jason E. Hicken,et al.  Parallel Newton-Krylov Solver for the Euler Equations Discretized Using Simultaneous-Approximation Terms , 2008 .

[29]  Burton Wendroff,et al.  The Relative Efficiency of Finite Difference and Finite Element Methods. I: Hyperbolic Problems and Splines , 1974 .

[30]  D. Gottlieb,et al.  Time-stable boundary conditions for finite-difference schemes solving hyperbolic systems: methodology and application to high-order compact schemes , 1994 .

[31]  David W. Zingg,et al.  Higher-order spatial discretization for turbulent aerodynamic computations , 2001 .

[32]  David W. Zingg,et al.  Time-accurate flow simulations using an efficient Newton-Krylov-Schur approach with high-order temporal and spatial discretization , 2013 .

[33]  P. Olsson Summation by parts, projections, and stability. II , 1995 .

[34]  Thomas H. Pulliam,et al.  Comparison of Several Spatial Discretizations for the Navier-Stokes Equations , 1999 .

[35]  Jason E. Hicken,et al.  Summation-by-parts operators and high-order quadrature , 2011, J. Comput. Appl. Math..

[36]  R. Temam Navier-Stokes Equations , 1977 .

[37]  Magnus Svärd,et al.  A stable high-order finite difference scheme for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations: No-slip wall boundary conditions , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[38]  Magnus Svärd,et al.  A stable high-order finite difference scheme for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations, far-field boundary conditions , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[39]  Magnus Svärd,et al.  On Coordinate Transformations for Summation-by-Parts Operators , 2004, J. Sci. Comput..

[40]  Bertil Gustafsson,et al.  The convergence rate for difference approximations to general mixed initial boundary value problems , 1981 .