Behavioural and ecological consequences of limited attention.

Ecological research in the past few decades has shown that most animals acquire and respond adaptively to information that affects survival and reproduction. At the same time, neurobiological studies have established that the rate of information processing by the brain is much lower than the rate at which information is encountered in the environment, and that attentional mechanisms enable the brain to focus only on the most essential information at any given time. Recent integration of the ecological and neurobiological approaches helps us to understand key behaviours with broad ecological and evolutionary implications. Specifically, current data indicate that limited attention affects diet choice and constrains animals' ability simultaneously to feed and attend to predators. Recent experiments also suggest that limited attention influences social interactions, courtship and mating behaviour.

[1]  L. Fleishman The Influence of the Sensory System and the Environment on Motion Patterns in the Visual Displays of Anoline Lizards and Other Vertebrates , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[2]  C. Clark,et al.  Searching for Cryptic Prey: A Dynamic Model , 1995 .

[3]  S. Treue Neural correlates of attention in primate visual cortex , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[4]  R. Zatorre,et al.  Shifting and focusing auditory spatial attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[6]  Graeme D. Ruxton,et al.  Social Foraging Theory. Monographs in Behaviour and Ecology , 2001 .

[7]  D. Papaj Conditioning of leaf-shape discrimination by chemical cues in the butterfly, Battus philenor , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  M. Milinski A predator's costs of overcoming the confusion-effect of swarming prey , 1984, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  S. Nylin,et al.  The role of female search behaviour in determining host plant range in plant feeding insects: a test of the information processing hypothesis , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  Alan C. Kamil,et al.  Limited attention: the constraint underlying search image , 2001 .

[11]  L. Tinbergen The Natural Control of Insects in Pinewoods , 1960 .

[12]  Olle Brick Fighting behaviour, vigilance and predation risk in the cichlid fish Nannacara anomala , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  S. Jay Samuels,et al.  Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading , 1974 .

[14]  C. Sandoval Differential visual predation on morphs of Timema cristinae (Phasmatodeae:Timemidae) and its consequences for host range , 1994 .

[15]  J. Staddon,et al.  Searching for Cryptic Prey: The Effect of Search Rate , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[16]  G A Orban,et al.  Attention to One or Two Features in Left or Right Visual Field: A Positron Emission Tomography Study , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Frogs Have Rules: Selective Attention Algorithms Regulate Chorusing in Physalaemus pustulosus (Leptodactylidae) , 2000 .

[18]  M. Raichle,et al.  Blood flow changes in human somatosensory cortex during anticipated stimulation , 1995, Nature.

[19]  Bruno A. Olshausen,et al.  Pattern recognition, attention, and information bottlenecks in the primate visual system , 1991, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[20]  E. Bernays,et al.  When host choice is a problem for a generalist herbivore: experiments with the whitefly, Bemisia tabaci , 1999 .

[21]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Allocation of attention in the visual field. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  P. Abrams Character Shifts of Prey Species That Share Predators , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[23]  F. Ballantyne,et al.  A polymorphism maintained by opposite patterns of parasitism and predation , 1997, Nature.

[24]  W. J. O'brien,et al.  Effects of current velocity and suspended debris on the drift feeding of Arctic grayling , 1993 .

[25]  D. J. Funk,et al.  Specialists make faster decisions than generalists: experiments with aphids , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  M Corbetta,et al.  Attentional modulation of neural processing of shape, color, and velocity in humans. , 1990, Science.

[27]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[28]  Manfred Milinski,et al.  Information overload and food selection , 1990 .

[29]  M. K. Tourtellot,et al.  Precedence effects and the evolution of chorusing , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  M. Ryan Sexual selection, sensory systems and sensory exploitation. , 1990 .

[31]  J. Endler Signals, Signal Conditions, and the Direction of Evolution , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[32]  L. Gilbert Ecological consequences of a coevolved mutualism between butterflies and plants , 1975, Coevolution of Animals and Plants.

[33]  J. Endler Frequency-dependent predation, crypsis and aposematic coloration. , 1988, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[34]  Yikweon Jang,et al.  Mechanisms of selective attention in grasshopper choruses: who listens to whom? , 1998, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[35]  T. SHALLICE,et al.  Learning and Memory , 1970, Nature.

[36]  A. Bond,et al.  Apostatic selection by blue jays produces balanced polymorphism in virtual prey , 1998, Nature.

[37]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Spatial Attention Effects in Macaque Area V4 , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  Jon H Kaas,et al.  Topographic Maps are Fundamental to Sensory Processing , 1997, Brain Research Bulletin.

[39]  K. Leibovic Information Processing in The Nervous System , 1969, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[40]  Marian Stamp Dawkins,et al.  Perceptual changes in chicks: Another look at the ‘search image’ concept , 1971 .

[41]  N. Cowan The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[42]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Allocation of attention in the visual field. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  P. Andersen,et al.  [Learning and memory]. , 1995, Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke.

[44]  R. C. Miller The Significance of the Gregarious Habit , 1922 .

[45]  J. Terborgh,et al.  Oddity and the ‘confusion effect’ in predation , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[46]  Jens Krause,et al.  Influence of prey foraging posture on flight behavior and predation risk: predators take advantage of unwary prey , 1996 .

[47]  A C Kamil,et al.  Search Image Formation in the Blue Jay (Cyanocitta cristata) , 1979, Science.

[48]  B McElree,et al.  Working memory and focal attention. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[49]  M. Frye,et al.  Sensory response patterns and the evolution of visual signal design in anoline lizards , 1999, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[50]  N. Cowan Activation, attention, and short-term memory , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[51]  E A Bernays,et al.  The Value of Being a Resource Specialist: Behavioral Support for a Neural Hypothesis , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[52]  C. M. Langley Search images: selective attention to specific visual features of prey. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[53]  Neil H. C. Fraser,et al.  Habitat profitability and choice in a sit-and-wait predator : juvenile salmon prefer slower currents on darker nights , 1997 .

[54]  J. A. Allen,et al.  Frequency-dependent selection by predators. , 1988, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[55]  A. Kamil,et al.  The cost of limited attention in blue jays , 2000 .

[56]  P. Blough Selective attention and search images in pigeons. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[57]  M. Shaw,et al.  Optimal allocation of cognitive resources to spatial locations. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[58]  E. Kandel,et al.  Essentials of Neural Science and Behavior , 1996 .

[59]  N. Mackintosh,et al.  Visual search for cryptic stimuli in pigeons: implications for the search image and search rate hypotheses , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[60]  E. Bernays Neural limitations in phytophagous insects: implications for diet breadth and evolution of host affiliation. , 2001, Annual review of entomology.

[61]  A. Bond,et al.  Searching image in blue jays: Facilitation and interference in sequential priming , 1999 .

[62]  S. Shettleworth,et al.  Detection of cryptic prey: search image or search rate? , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[63]  Douglas G. Richards,et al.  Alerting and Message Components in Songs of Rufous-Sided Towhees , 1981 .

[64]  M. Rausher Search Image for Leaf Shape in a Butterfly , 1978, Science.

[65]  G. Logan Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[66]  R. Ricklefs,et al.  ASPECT DIVERSITY IN MOTHS: A TEMPERATE‐TROPICAL COMPARISON , 1975, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[67]  R. Desimone,et al.  Modulation of Oscillatory Neuronal Synchronization by Selective Visual Attention , 2001, Science.

[68]  J. Godin,et al.  A fitness cost of foraging in the guppy , 1988, Nature.

[69]  V. Nams Density-dependent predation by skunks using olfactory search images , 1997, Oecologia.

[70]  Stephen P. Ellner,et al.  Information Processing and Prey Detection , 1993 .