How Should a Robot React Before People's Touch?: Modeling a Pre-Touch Reaction Distance for a Robot's Face

This study addresses the pre touch reaction distance effects in human–robot touch interaction with an android named ERICA that has a feminine, human-like appearance. Past studies on human–robot interaction, which enabled social robots to react to being touched by developing several sensing systems and designing reaction behaviors, focused on after-touch situations, i.e., before-touch situations received less attention. In this study, we conducted a data collection to investigate the minimum comfortable distance to another's touch by observing a data set of human–human touch interactions, modeled its distance relationships, and implemented a model with our robot. We experimentally investigated the effectiveness of the modeled minimum comfortable distance to being touched with participants. Our experiment results showed that they highly evaluated a robot that reacts to being touched based on the modeled minimum comfortable distance.

[1]  Remo Sala,et al.  Motion Capture: An Evaluation of Kinect V2 Body Tracking for Upper Limb Motion Analysis , 2016, MobiHealth.

[2]  K. Light,et al.  More frequent partner hugs and higher oxytocin levels are linked to lower blood pressure and heart rate in premenopausal women , 2005, Biological Psychology.

[3]  Tiffany L. Chen,et al.  Evaluation by Expert Dancers of a Robot That Performs Partnered Stepping via Haptic Interaction , 2015, PloS one.

[4]  Brooke C. Feeney,et al.  Keep in touch: The effects of imagined touch support on stress and exploration , 2016 .

[5]  William J. Doyle,et al.  Does Hugging Provide Stress-Buffering Social Support? A Study of Susceptibility to Upper Respiratory Infection and Illness , 2015, Psychological science.

[6]  Andrea Lockerd Thomaz,et al.  An Investigation of Responses to Robot-Initiated Touch in a Nursing Context , 2014, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[7]  H. Ishiguro,et al.  Huggable communication medium decreases cortisol levels , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[8]  Karon E. MacLean,et al.  The Role of Affective Touch in Human-Robot Interaction: Human Intent and Expectations in Touching the Haptic Creature , 2012, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[9]  Thomas Bak,et al.  Pose estimation and adaptive robot behaviour for human-robot interaction , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[10]  M. Baldassare,et al.  Cultural Variations in Personal Space , 1975 .

[11]  C. Spence,et al.  The science of interpersonal touch: An overview , 2010, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[12]  Gijs Huisman,et al.  Social Touch Technology: A Survey of Haptic Technology for Social Touch , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[13]  Kazuhiro Kosuge,et al.  Dance partner robot - Ms DanceR , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453).

[14]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  Stop! That is close enough. How body postures influence human-robot proximity , 2016, 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[15]  Masayuki Nakajima,et al.  Personal Space Modeling for Human-Computer Interaction , 2009, ICEC.

[16]  Alexander Toet,et al.  How to Touch Humans: Guidelines for Social Agents and Robots That Can Touch , 2013, 2013 Humaine Association Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction.

[17]  François Michaud,et al.  Using proprioceptive sensors for categorizing human-robot interactions , 2007, 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[18]  Akinori Ito,et al.  Influence of the Size Factor of a Mobile Robot Moving Toward a Human on Subjective Acceptable Distance , 2011 .

[19]  Norihiro Hagita,et al.  How Do Communication Cues Change Impressions of Human–Robot Touch Interaction? , 2018, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[20]  Mohamed Chetouani,et al.  Automated Prediction of Extraversion During Human–Humanoid Interaction , 2017, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[21]  Javier V. Gómez,et al.  Social Path Planning : Generic Human-Robot Interaction Framework for Robotic Navigation Tasks , 2013 .

[22]  Tatsuya Kawahara,et al.  ERICA: The ERATO Intelligent Conversational Android , 2016, 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[23]  T. Shibata,et al.  Use of a Therapeutic, Socially Assistive Pet Robot (PARO) in Improving Mood and Stimulating Social Interaction and Communication for People With Dementia: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial , 2015, JMIR research protocols.

[24]  Thomas Bak,et al.  Trajectory planning for robots in dynamic human environments , 2010, 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[25]  Pei-Luen Patrick Rau,et al.  A Cross-cultural Study: Effect of Robot Appearance and Task , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[26]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  Acceptance of Healthcare Robots for the Older Population: Review and Future Directions , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[27]  David G. Lowe,et al.  Fast Approximate Nearest Neighbors with Automatic Algorithm Configuration , 2009, VISAPP.

[28]  Chris Bevan,et al.  Shaking Hands and Cooperation in Tele-present Human-Robot Negotiation , 2015, 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[29]  Takayuki Nagai,et al.  Estimation of child personality for child-robot interaction , 2017, 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[30]  Alexander Toet,et al.  Affective and Behavioral Responses to Robot-Initiated Social Touch: Toward Understanding the Opportunities and Limitations of Physical Contact in Human–Robot Interaction , 2017, Front. ICT.

[31]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  A Robot that Approaches Pedestrians , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[32]  Norihiro Hagita,et al.  A hug from a robot encourages prosocial behavior , 2017, 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[33]  Leila Takayama,et al.  Influences on proxemic behaviors in human-robot interaction , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[34]  Ciro Natale,et al.  A Distributed Tactile Sensor for Intuitive Human-Robot Interfacing , 2017, J. Sensors.

[35]  Radu Bogdan Rusu,et al.  3D is here: Point Cloud Library (PCL) , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[36]  R. Simmons,et al.  COMPANION: A Constraint-Optimizing Method for Person-Acceptable Navigation , 2009, RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[37]  Kai Oliver Arras,et al.  Socially-aware robot navigation: A learning approach , 2012, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[38]  M. Knapp,et al.  Nonverbal communication in human interaction , 1972 .

[39]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Modeling and Controlling Friendliness for An Interactive Museum Robot , 2014, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[40]  C. Wetzel,et al.  The Midas Touch , 1984 .

[41]  T. Field.  Touch for Socioemotional and Physical Well-Being: A Review. , 2010 .

[42]  S. Heshka,et al.  Interpersonal Speaking Distance as a Function of Age, Sex, and Relationship , 1972 .

[43]  K. Light,et al.  Warm Partner Contact Is Related to Lower Cardiovascular Reactivity , 2003, Behavioral medicine.

[44]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  Human-robot proxemics: Physical and psychological distancing in human-robot interaction , 2011, 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[45]  Norihiro Hagita,et al.  A Robot that Encourages Self-disclosure by Hug , 2017, ICSR.

[46]  Masahiro Shiomi,et al.  ‘Midas touch’ in human-robot interaction: Evidence from event-related potentials during the ultimatum game , 2012, 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[47]  Sonya S. Kwak,et al.  Am I acceptable to you? Effect of a robot's verbal language forms on people's social distance from robots , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[48]  Silvia Rossi,et al.  User's Personality and Activity Influence on HRI Comfortable Distances , 2017, ICSR.

[49]  Norihiro Hagita,et al.  Do Audio-Visual Stimuli Change Hug Impressions? , 2017, ICSR.

[50]  Hiroshi Ishiguro,et al.  Does A Robot’s Touch Encourage Human Effort? , 2017, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[51]  E. Hall,et al.  The Hidden Dimension , 1970 .

[52]  Jenay M. Beer,et al.  Older adults’ acceptance of a robot for partner dance-based exercise , 2017, PloS one.

[53]  E. Goffman,et al.  Forms of talk , 1982 .