Bringing enterprise architecture to the boardroom

Aligning business and Information Technology (IT) has become an important issue for any organization and Enterprise Architecture (EA) is very much related to this purpose. EA describes the overall structure and coherence of an organization. As such, it can provide valuable input for strategic decision making at the executive level. In recent years, EA has become an established discipline both in academia and industry. This research is proposed to take the challenge in presenting EA to the top-level management for a decision making support activity. The research is conducted according to the design science research methodology. A theoretical framework supports the definition of EA, EA stakeholders and their concerns, and the types of EA analysis. Then, the identification of the current decision making process in the domain of EA is explored and then an approach to formalize the decision making activity is proposed. The focus is in the visual representation of the quantitative analysis for the decision making process. The findings of the research is expected to extend the research line in EA domain about the formalization of decision making activity for the top-level management. The first result of this research is a formalized top-down method to support decision making activity that is called EA-based decision making method. Two out of eight steps from the method are explored intensively: defining the metric and preparing the presentation and visualization. This generic method is presented to address all relevant activities to support decision making based on information from EA and prepared in such way for an ease in practical use. The second result is a dashboard concept to facilitate the visualization of this method. The data structure and logic behind the dashboard is presented. To demonstrate the proposed artifacts, the method is applied by means of a case study and then a dashboard concept is implemented in a dashboard prototype. Finally, an evaluation for both artifacts by means of interviews is conducted to know how well they support a solution to the problem. The result provides positive indications.

[1]  Daniel L. Moody,et al.  The “Physics” of Notations: Toward a Scientific Basis for Constructing Visual Notations in Software Engineering , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[2]  Farhad Arbab,et al.  Enterprise architecture: Management tool and blueprint for the organisation , 2006, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[3]  Maria-Eugenia Iacob,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Enterprise Architectures , 2006 .

[4]  Dick A. C. Quartel,et al.  IT Portfolio Valuation - Using Enterprise Architecture and Business Requirements Modeling , 2010, 2010 14th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference.

[5]  Anol Bhattacherjee Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices , 2012 .

[6]  Scott A. Bernard An Introduction to Enterprise Architecture , 2004 .

[7]  Gene Zelazny Say It With Charts: The Executive's Guide to Visual Communication , 2001 .

[8]  Hans van Vliet,et al.  Stakeholder Perception of Enterprise Architecture , 2008, ECSA.

[9]  Robert L. Harris Information Graphics: A Comprehensive Illustrated Reference: Visual Tools for Analyzing, Managing, and Communicating , 1997 .

[10]  Marlies van Steenbergen,et al.  On Course, but not There Yet: Enterprise Architecture Conformance and Benefits in Systems Development , 2020, ICIS.

[11]  Josh Dehlinger,et al.  On Applying the Theory of Structuration in Enterprise Architecture Design , 2010, 2010 IEEE/ACIS 9th International Conference on Computer and Information Science.

[12]  Harold Kerzner,et al.  Project Management Metrics, KPIs, and Dashboards: A Guide to Measuring and Monitoring Project Performance , 2011 .

[13]  Mathias Ekstedt Enterprise architecture for IT management : a CIO decision making perspective on the electrical power industry , 2004 .

[14]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Rita L. Sallam,et al.  Magic Quadrant for Business Intelligence and Analytics Platforms , 2013 .

[16]  Marc M. Lankhorst,et al.  Enterprise Architecture at Work - Modelling, Communication and Analysis, 2nd Edition , 2005, The Enterprise Engineering Series.

[17]  Iris Vessey,et al.  Cognitive Fit: A Theory‐Based Analysis of the Graphs Versus Tables Literature* , 1991 .

[18]  Marlies van Steenbergen,et al.  Achieving Enterprise Architecture Benefits: What Makes the Difference? , 2011, 2011 IEEE 15th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops.

[19]  Bas van der Raadt,et al.  Enterprise Architecture Coming of Age : Increasing the Performance of an Emerging Discipline , 2011 .

[20]  Mark Bailey,et al.  The Grammar of Graphics , 2007, Technometrics.

[21]  Maria-Eugenia Iacob,et al.  Delivering Enterprise Architecture with TOGAF® and ARCHIMATE® , 2012 .

[22]  Mathias Ekstedt,et al.  Using Enterprise Architecture for CIO Decision-Making On the Importance of Theory , 2004 .

[23]  John A. Zachman,et al.  Enterprise Architecture: The Issue of the Century , 2001 .

[24]  Erik Johansson,et al.  A Tool for Enterprise Architecture Analysis , 2007, 11th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC 2007).

[25]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research , 2008 .

[26]  Mathias Ekstedt,et al.  A survey on CIO concerns-do enterprise architecture frameworks support them? , 2006, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[27]  Marc M. Lankhorst Enterprise Architecture at Work - Modelling, Communication and Analysis, 3rd Edition , 2005, The Enterprise Engineering Series.

[28]  Tero Päivärinta,et al.  Describing and Communicating Software Architecture in Practice: Observations on Stakeholders and Rationale , 2002, CAiSE.

[29]  Hans van Vliet,et al.  The relation between EA effectiveness and stakeholder satisfaction , 2010, J. Syst. Softw..

[30]  Moustafa Chenine,et al.  Using Enterprise Architecture Models for System Quality Analysis , 2008, 2008 12th International IEEE Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference.

[31]  D. Turner Qualitative Interview Design: A Practical Guide for Novice Investigators , 2010 .

[32]  Zhou Yong Business Process Modeling , 2002 .

[33]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..