Interactive and Common Knowledge in the State-Space Model

This paper deals with the prevailing formal model for knowledge in contemporary economics, namely the state-space model introduced by Robert Aumann in 1976. In particular, the paper addresses the following question arising in this formalism: in order to state that an event is interactively or commonly known among a group of agents, do we need to assume that each of them knows how the information is imparted to the others? Aumann answered in the negative, but his arguments apply only to canonical, i.e., completely specified state spaces, while in most applications the state space is not canonical. This paper addresses the same question along original lines, demonstrating that the answer is negative for both canonical and not-canonical state spaces. Further, it shows that this result ensues from two counterintuitive properties held by knowledge in the state-space model, namely Substitutivity and Monotonicity.

[1]  Dov Samet,et al.  Coherent beliefs are not always types , 1999 .

[2]  E. Zalta,et al.  Intensional Logic and the Metaphysics of Intentionality. , 1991 .

[3]  Martin Meier,et al.  On the nonexistence of universal information structures , 2005, J. Econ. Theory.

[4]  David M. Kreps,et al.  Rationality and knowledge in game theory , 1997 .

[5]  R. Montague On the Nature of Certain Philosophical Entities , 1969 .

[6]  A. Heifetz,et al.  Hierarchies of knowledge: an unbounded stairway☆ , 1999 .

[7]  Aviad Heifetz How canonical is the canonical model? A comment on Aumann's interactive epistemology , 1999, Int. J. Game Theory.

[8]  A. Rubinstein COMMENTS ON THE INTERPRETATION OF GAME THEORY , 1991 .

[9]  S. Zamir,et al.  Formulation of Bayesian analysis for games with incomplete information , 1985 .

[10]  Polly S Nichols,et al.  Agreeing to disagree. , 2005, General dentistry.

[11]  Ronald Fagin,et al.  Reasoning about knowledge , 1995 .

[12]  Dov Samet,et al.  Knowledge Spaces with Arbitrarily High Rank , 1998 .

[13]  Dov Samet,et al.  'Knowing Whether', 'Knowing That' and the Cardinality of State Spaces , 1996 .

[14]  Sérgio Ribeiro da Costa Werlang,et al.  Common knowledge and game theory , 1986 .

[15]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  AN AXIOMATIC CHARACTERIZATION OF COMMON KNOWLEDGE , 1981 .

[16]  Adam Brandenburger,et al.  The power of paradox: some recent developments in interactive epistemology , 2007, Int. J. Game Theory.

[17]  Philippe Mongin,et al.  A Non-Minimal But Very Weak Axiomatization of Common Belief , 1994, Artif. Intell..

[18]  G. Bealer Intensional Entities , 2022 .

[19]  M. Bacharach Some extensions of a claim of Aumann in an axiomatic model of knowledge , 1985 .

[20]  Richard Montague,et al.  Pragmatics and intensional logic , 1970, Synthese.

[21]  L. Samuelson Modeling knowledge in economic analysis , 2004 .

[22]  Ariel Rubinstein,et al.  A Course in Game Theory , 1995 .

[23]  D. Monderer,et al.  Approximating common knowledge with common beliefs , 1989 .

[24]  Mark Perlman,et al.  The Rational Foundations of Economic Behaviour , 1996 .

[25]  Adam Brandenburger,et al.  Knowledge and Equilibrium in Games , 1992 .

[27]  S. Modica,et al.  Unawareness and Partitional Information Structures , 1999 .

[28]  G. Frege Über Sinn und Bedeutung , 1892 .

[29]  Barton L. Lipman,et al.  Standard state-space models preclude unawareness , 1998 .

[30]  Daniel Gallin,et al.  Intensional and Higher-Order Modal Logic , 1975 .

[31]  Robert Sugden,et al.  COMMON KNOWLEDGE, SALIENCE AND CONVENTION: A RECONSTRUCTION OF DAVID LEWIS' GAME THEORY , 2003, Economics and Philosophy.

[32]  Martin Meier,et al.  Hierarchies of beliefs for compact possibility models , 2005 .

[33]  S. Morris COWLES FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH IN ECONOMICS , 2001 .

[34]  Ronald Fagin,et al.  The hierarchical approach to modeling knowledge and common knowledge , 1999, Int. J. Game Theory.

[35]  Edward L. Keenan,et al.  The Intensional Logic , 1985 .

[36]  Robert J. Aumann,et al.  Interactive epistemology I: Knowledge , 1999, Int. J. Game Theory.

[37]  Nancy L. Stokey,et al.  Information, Trade, and Common Knowledge , 1982 .

[38]  Eddie Dekel,et al.  Hierarchies of Beliefs and Common Knowledge , 1993 .

[39]  Rudolf Carnap,et al.  Meaning and Necessity , 1947 .

[40]  Joseph Y. Halpern Alternative Semantics for Unawareness , 2000, Games Econ. Behav..

[41]  R. Aumann Correlated Equilibrium as an Expression of Bayesian Rationality Author ( s ) , 1987 .

[42]  Myron Louis Gochnauer,et al.  The Analysis of Knowledge , 1941, Nature.

[43]  Philippe Mongin,et al.  Strong Completeness Theorems for Weak Logics of Common Belief , 2003, J. Philos. Log..

[44]  Burkhard C. Schipper,et al.  Interactive Unawareness , 2005, J. Econ. Theory.

[45]  John Geanakoplos,et al.  Common Knowledge , 1992, TARK.

[46]  N. Malcolm On Knowledge and Belief , 1954 .

[47]  Jing Li Information Structures with Unawareness , 2008 .

[48]  Robert J. Aumann,et al.  Musings on Information and Knowledge , 2005 .

[49]  Itzhak Gilboa,et al.  Information and Meta Information , 1988, TARK.

[50]  Alonzo Church,et al.  A Formulation of the Logic of Sense and Denotation , 1952 .

[51]  Pierpaolo Battigalli,et al.  Recent results on belief, knowledge and the epistemic foundations of game theory , 1999 .