The locus of attentional effects in texture segmentation

Cuing covert spatial attention can increase spatial resolution. Here we pinpointed the specific locus of this effect using texture segmentation. At the level of visual cortex, texture segmentation theoretically involves passage of visual input through two layers of spatial linear filters separated by a pointwise nonlinearity. By manipulating the textures to differentially stimulate first- or second-order filters of various scales, we showed that the attentional effect consistently varied with the latter. These psychophysical results further support the hypothesis that attention increases resolution at the attended location and are consistent with an effect of attention at stages as early as the primary visual cortex.

[1]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Spatial vision. , 1971, Annual review of psychology.

[2]  S. Klein,et al.  Is spatial adaptation caused by prolonged inhibition? , 1977, Vision Research.

[3]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  J. Robson,et al.  Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field , 1981, Vision Research.

[5]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex , 1982, Vision Research.

[6]  Ennio Mingolla,et al.  Neural dynamics of perceptual grouping: Textures, boundaries, and emergent segmentations , 1985 .

[7]  R. Desimone,et al.  Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. , 1985, Science.

[8]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[9]  D J Heeger,et al.  Model for the extraction of image flow. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[10]  J. Beck,et al.  Contrast and spatial variables in texture segregation: Testing a simple spatial-frequency channels model , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  N. Graham.  Visual Pattern Analyzers , 1989 .

[12]  L. Kehrer.  Central performance drop on perceptual segregation tasks. , 1989, Spatial vision.

[13]  P Perona,et al.  Preattentive texture discrimination with early vision mechanisms. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[14]  B. S. Rubenstein,et al.  Spatial variability as a limiting factor in texture-discrimination tasks: implications for performance asymmetries. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[15]  D. Sagi.  Detection of an orientation singularity in gabor textures: Effect of signal density and spatial-frequency , 1990, Vision Research.

[16]  Michael S. Landy,et al.  Computational models of visual processing , 1991 .

[17]  Norma Graham,et al.  Nonlinear processes in spatial-frequency channel models of perceived texture segregation: Effects of sign and amount of contrast , 1992, Vision Research.

[18]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  Organization of texture segregation processing in primate visual cortex , 1993, Visual Neuroscience.

[19]  B. C. Motter.  Focal attention produces spatially selective processing in visual cortical areas V1, V2, and V4 in the presence of competing stimuli. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  N. Graham,et al.  Spatial-frequency- and orientation-selectivity of simple and complex channels in region segregation , 1993, Vision Research.

[21]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  The visual filter mediating letter identification , 1994, Nature.

[22]  J D Victor,et al.  Striate cortex extracts higher-order spatial correlations from visual textures. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Human luminance pattern-vision mechanisms: masking experiments require a new model. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[24]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[25]  Harold Pashler,et al.  Spatial attention and vernier acuity , 1995, Vision Research.

[26]  Victor A. F. Lamme.  The neurophysiology of figure-ground segregation in primary visual cortex , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[27]  G. Sperling,et al.  Measuring the spatial frequency selectivity of second-order texture mechanisms , 1995, Vision Research.

[28]  Y Tsal,et al.  Inattention magnifies perceived length: the attentional receptive field hypothesis. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  R. Gurnsey,et al.  Texture segmentation along the horizontal meridian: nonmonotonic changes in performance with eccentricity. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  F. Kingdom,et al.  A linear systems approach to the detection of both abrupt and smooth spatial variations in orientation-defined textures , 1996, Vision Research.

[31]  Lothar Kehrer.  The central performance drop in texture segmentation: a simulation based on a spatial filter model , 1997, Biological Cybernetics.

[32]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Attentional requirements in a ‘preattentive’ feature search task , 1997, Nature.

[33]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque visual cortex. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  Gunther W. Balz,et al.  The Effect of Attentional Spread on Spatial Resolution , 1997, Vision Research.

[35]  M. Carrasco,et al.  The contribution of covert attention to the set-size and eccentricity effects in visual search. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution , 1998, Nature.

[37]  M. Morgan,et al.  Visual Search for a Tilted Target: Tests of Spatial Uncertainty Models , 1998, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[38]  N. Graham,et al.  Spatial summation in simple (fourier) and complex (non-fourier) texture channels , 1998, Vision Research.

[39]  B. Dosher,et al.  External noise distinguishes attention mechanisms , 1998, Vision Research.

[40]  William Prinzmetal,et al.  Phenomenology of attention: I. Color, location, orientation, and spatial frequency. , 1998 .

[41]  E. DeYoe,et al.  A physiological correlate of the 'spotlight' of visual attention , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[42]  R. Desimone,et al.  The Role of Neural Mechanisms of Attention in Solving the Binding Problem , 1999, Neuron.

[43]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Attention Modulates Contextual Influences in the Primary Visual Cortex of Alert Monkeys , 1999, Neuron.

[44]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Involvement of striate and extrastriate visual cortical areas in spatial attention , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[45]  C. Koch,et al.  Attention activates winner-take-all competition among visual filters , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[46]  D. Heeger,et al.  Spatial attention affects brain activity in human primary visual cortex. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Spatial covert attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF: support for signal enhancement , 2000, Vision Research.

[48]  RussLL L. Ds Vnlos,et al.  SPATIAL FREQUENCY SELECTIVITY OF CELLS IN MACAQUE VISUAL CORTEX , 2022 .