How efficient and productive are road toll companies?: Evidence from Norway

This article evaluates the technical efficiency of toll companies, i.e., how toll companies perform relative to each other, their productivity, and whether toll companies improve their efficiency from one year to the next relative to the best performers. The rationale for this study is that Norwegian road toll companies have been criticized for not being as efficient as they should; it has been claimed that some have very large operational costs compared to their peers and hence are inefficient. The framework for analysis is Data Envelopment Analysis and its subsequent Malmquist Productivity indices. The data are from the accounting period of 2001-2004 and contain information on 18 companies. The results show that: (1) there is a potential for efficiency increases of about 14%, (2) there are economies of scale in the industry in that larger companies (as measured by number of lanes served) tend to be more efficient compared to smaller companies, and (3) there has been a productivity increase in the sector of about 1%, and this progress is due more to companies employing a newer and more effective method for collecting funds and less to improving efficiency from one year to the next. Finally, these findings suggest that the Norwegian road authorities should consider reorganizing the toll sector such that the inherent economies of scale are utilized.

[1]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[2]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes , 2007 .

[3]  Kuo-Ping Chang,et al.  The relative efficiency of public versus private municipal bus firms: An application of data envelopment analysis , 1992 .

[4]  P. Pestieau,et al.  Public Enterprise Economics.@@@The Performance of Public Enterprises: Concepts and Measurement. , 1987 .

[5]  James Odeck,et al.  Evaluating efficiency in the Norwegian bus industry using data envelopment analysis , 2001 .

[6]  B. Golany,et al.  Using rank statistics for determining programmatic efficiency differences in data envelopment analysis , 1996 .

[7]  Operating costs in Norwegian toll companies: a panel data analysis , 2007 .

[8]  James Odeck,et al.  Congestion, ownership, region of operation, and scale: Their impact on bus operator performance in Norway , 2006 .

[9]  Finn R. Førsund,et al.  Technical efficiency of Norwegian banks: The non-parametric approach to efficiency measurement , 1991 .

[10]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[11]  M. Farrell The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[12]  Lennart Hjalmarsson,et al.  Productivity in multiple output public service: A quadratic frontier function and Malmquist index approach , 1995 .

[13]  D. Vitaliano,et al.  ASSESSING THE EFFICIENCY OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS USING DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS AND FRONTIER REGRESSION , 1999 .

[14]  James Odeck,et al.  Toll financing in Norway: The success, the failures and perspectives for the future , 2002 .

[15]  Shawna Grosskopf,et al.  Some Remarks on Productivity and its Decompositions , 2003 .

[16]  Kristiaan Kerstens,et al.  Public transit performance: What does one learn from frontier studies? , 2002 .

[17]  C. Lovell,et al.  The Decomposition of Malmquist Productivity Indexes , 2003 .

[18]  C. Lovell,et al.  A note on the Malmquist productivity index , 1995 .

[19]  R. Färe,et al.  The measurement of efficiency of production , 1985 .

[20]  K. Kerstens Technical efficiency measurement and explanation of French urban transit companies , 1996 .

[21]  Jonathan Cowie,et al.  Acquisition, efficiency and scale economies: An analysis of the British bus industry , 2002 .

[22]  Dominique Deprins,et al.  Measuring Labor-Efficiency in Post Offices , 2006 .

[23]  Philip A. Viton,et al.  TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY IN MULTI-MODE BUS TRANSIT: A PRODUCTION FRONTIER ANALYSIS , 1997 .

[24]  James Odeck,et al.  Assessing the relative efficiency and productivity growth of vehicle inspection services: An application of DEA and Malmquist indices , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  Philippe Vanden Eeckaut,et al.  Non-parametric efficiency, progress and regress measures for panel data: Methodological aspects☆ , 1995 .

[26]  Jonathan Cowie,et al.  Organisation form, scale effects and efficiency in the British bus industry , 1999 .

[27]  Dag Morten Dalen,et al.  Yardsticks on the road: Regulatory contracts and cost efficiency in the Norwegian bus industry , 2003 .

[28]  Henry Tulkens,et al.  On FDH efficiency analysis: Some methodological issues and applications to retail banking, courts, and urban transit , 1993 .