Deviant neural processing of phonotactic probabilities in adults with dyslexia

During language acquisition in the first year of life, children become sensitive to phonotactic probabilities such as the likelihood of speech sound occurrences in the ambient language. Because this sensitivity is acquired at an early age, the extent to which the neural system that underlies speech processing in adults is tuned to these phonological regularities can reflect difficulties in processing language-specific phonological regularities that can persist into adulthood. Here, we examined the neural processing of phonotactic probabilities in 18 adults with dyslexia and 18 non-dyslexic controls using mismatch negativity, a pre-attentive neurophysiological response. Stimuli that differed in phonotactic probability elicited similar mismatch negativity responses among the adults with dyslexia, whereas the controls responded more strongly to stimuli with a high phonotactic probability than to stimuli with a low phonotactic probability, suggesting that controls – but not adults with dyslexia – are sensitive to the phonological regularities of the ambient language. These findings suggest that the underlying neural system in adults with dyslexia is not properly tuned to language-specific phonological regularities, which may partially account for the phonological deficits that are often reported in dyslexic individuals.

[1]  M. Bonte,et al.  Deviant neurophysiological responses to phonological regularities in speech in dyslexic children , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  Holger Mitterer,et al.  Auditory cortical tuning to statistical regularities in phonology , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  L. Jancke,et al.  ERP differences of pre-lexical processing between dyslexic and non-dyslexic children. , 2010, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[4]  H. Mitterer,et al.  Neural evidence of allophonic perception in children at risk for dyslexia , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  Jean-François Démonet,et al.  Developmental dyslexia , 2004, The Lancet.

[6]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[7]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Phonological variation and inference in lexical access. , 1996 .

[8]  H. Mitterer The mental lexicon is fully specified: evidence from eye-tracking. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Charles Hulme,et al.  The science of reading: A handbook. , 2005 .

[10]  R Näätänen,et al.  Pre-attentive detection of vowel contrasts utilizes both phonetic and auditory memory representations. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[11]  M. Habib,et al.  The neurological basis of developmental dyslexia: an overview and working hypothesis. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  R. Näätänen,et al.  The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: A review , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  C. C. Duncan,et al.  Event-related potentials in clinical research: Guidelines for eliciting, recording, and quantifying mismatch negativity, P300, and N400 , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  Daniel Brandeis,et al.  Visual print tuning deficits in dyslexic adolescents under minimized phonological demands , 2013, NeuroImage.

[15]  D. Gow Assimilation and Anticipation in Continuous Spoken Word Recognition , 2001 .

[16]  Moritz Grosse-Wentrup,et al.  Multisubject Learning for Common Spatial Patterns in Motor-Imagery BCI , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[17]  J. Fletcher,et al.  Specific reading disability (dyslexia): what have we learned in the past four decades? , 2004, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[18]  Henning Reetz,et al.  Distinctive features: Phonological underspecification in representation and processing , 2010, J. Phonetics.

[19]  Peter W. Jusczyk,et al.  How infants begin to extract words from speech , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  A. Lahiri,et al.  Neurobiological Evidence for Abstract Phonological Representations in the Mental Lexicon during Speech Recognition , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[22]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[23]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Phonological variation and inference in lexical access. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[25]  S E Shaywitz,et al.  Neurobiological studies of reading and reading disability. , 2001, Journal of communication disorders.