For many reasons building simulation programs are still not recognised as useful design support tools to the same extent as Computer-Aided Design (CAD) or cost-estimating software. There is a strong perception that simulations are time consuming, costly, slow and require expensive or specialised equipment and knowledge that increase design costs. Additionally, simplifications applied to model description, algorithm inaccuracy, or deviations inherent to weather data treatment methods result in poor matches between measurements and predictions, which decrease confidence in obtained results. Finally, complex tools and interfaces raise doubts among potential users. In general terms, energy efficiency is a recent concern in Brazil, but has clearly come to the discussion forefront among all construction sector stakeholders. In architectural design teaching at the undergraduate level in Brazil, environmental comfort and energy efficiency have been traditionally kept as separate knowledge domains. To overcome these problems a new discipline has been introduced at the University of Campinas, UNICAMP in Brazil following a bioclimatic design studio, to consolidate the acquired knowledge and test concepts on student's designs. To evaluate this course an experimental follow-up research is currently underway. This paper discusses the contextual framework that motivated and founded the approach for the introduction of simulation as both a decision support tool and a design teaching resource. The bioclimatic design studio given in 2005 provided students a contact with simulation tools and was used to assess the suitability of the chosen tool for such experience.
[1]
Arthur H. Rosenfeld,et al.
Energy for Buildings and Homes.
,
1990
.
[2]
Edward Henry Mathews,et al.
An efficient tool for future building design
,
1993
.
[3]
Caixa Postal,et al.
A VISUALIZAÇÃO DO CONFORTO AMBIENTAL NO PROJETO ARQUITETÔNICO
,
1998
.
[4]
A. Mahdavi,et al.
COMPLEX BUILDING PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS IN EARLY STAGES OF DESIGN: A solution based on differential modeling, homology-based mapping, and generative design agents
,
2001
.
[5]
F Drkal,et al.
BARRIERS AND SOLUTIONS TO THE USE OF BUILDING SIMULATION IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC
,
1999
.
[6]
John Hosking,et al.
Integrating design tools for total building evaluation
,
1993
.
[7]
J. Hand,et al.
AN APPLICATION MANUAL FOR BUILDING ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING
,
1997
.
[8]
Jon Hand,et al.
Assessing energy, lighting, room acoustics, occupant comfort and environmental impacts performance of building with a single simulation program
,
2002
.
[9]
Joseph Andrew Clarke,et al.
Advanced design tools for energy conscious building design: Development and dissemination
,
1991
.
[10]
Edward Henry Mathews,et al.
Needs and trends in integrated building and HVAC thermal design tools
,
1993
.
[11]
Ashraf M. Salama.
New Trends in Architectural Education: Designing the Design Studio
,
1995
.