Probabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution

Abstract Natural languages contain probabilistic constraints that influence the resolution of ambiguities. Current models of sentence processing agree that probabilistic constraints affect syntactic ambiguity resolution, but there has been little investigation of the constraints themselves-what they are, how they differ in their effects on processing, and how they interact with one another. Three different types of probabilistic constraints were investigated: “pre-ambiguity” plausibility information, information about verb argument structure frequencies, and “post-ambiguity” constraints that arrive after the introduction of the ambiguity but prior to its disambiguation. Reading times for syntactically ambiguous sentences were compared to reading times for unambiguous controls in three self-paced reading experiments. All three kinds of constraints were found to be helpful, and when several constraints converged, ambiguity resolution was facilitated compared to when constraints conflicted. The importance of...

[1]  M. Baltin,et al.  The Mental representation of grammatical relations , 1985 .

[2]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Sentence comprehension: A parallel distributed processing approach , 1989, Language and Cognitive Processes.

[3]  John J. L. Morton,et al.  Interaction of information in word recognition. , 1969 .

[4]  Fernanda Ferreira,et al.  Ambiguity in context , 1989 .

[5]  F. Cuetos,et al.  Cross-linguistic differences in parsing: Restrictions on the use of the Late Closure strategy in Spanish , 1988, Cognition.

[6]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  Resolution of quantifier scope ambiguities , 1993, Cognition.

[7]  A. Garnham,et al.  Avoiding the garden path: Eye movements in context , 1992 .

[8]  K. Rayner,et al.  Resolution of syntactic category ambiguities: Eye movements in parsing lexically ambiguous sentences☆ , 1987 .

[9]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences , 1983 .

[10]  A. Garnham,et al.  Effects of syntax in human sentence parsing: Evidence against a structure-based proposal mechanism , 1994 .

[11]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Constituent Attachment and Thematic Role Assignment in Sentence Processing: Influences of Content-Based Expectations , 1988 .

[12]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Lexical structure and language comprehension , 1989 .

[13]  C. Clifton,et al.  The independence of syntactic processing , 1986 .

[14]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Thematic roles and language comprehension , 1988 .

[15]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Interaction with context during human sentence processing , 1988, Cognition.

[16]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[17]  Mark Steedman,et al.  On not being led up the garden path : The use of context by the psychological syntax processor , 1985 .

[18]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Ambiguity in context: A reply , 1989 .

[19]  Alan Garnham,et al.  Effects of context in human sentence parsing: Evidence against a discourse-based proposal mechanism. , 1992 .

[20]  K. Rayner,et al.  Discourse influences during parsing are delayed , 1992, Cognition.

[21]  J. Hawkins.  A parsing theory of word order universals , 1990 .

[22]  John Robert Ross,et al.  Constraints on variables in syntax , 1967 .

[23]  William D Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech , 1978, Cognitive Psychology.

[24]  M. A. Britt,et al.  Parsing in discourse: Context effects and their limits , 1992 .

[25]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Sentence processing: A tutorial review. , 1987 .

[26]  M. MacDonald.  The interaction of lexical and syntactic ambiguity , 1993 .

[27]  B. Levin,et al.  The formation of adjectival passives , 1985 .

[28]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Semantic Influences On Parsing: Use of Thematic Role Information in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution , 1994 .

[29]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Information-Based Syntax and Semantics: Volume 1, Fundamentals , 1987 .

[30]  V. M. Holmes,et al.  Lexical Expectations in Parsing Complement-Verb Sentences , 1989 .

[31]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Introduction to special issue of Cognition on lexical and conceptual semantics , 1991, Cognition.

[32]  John C. Trueswell,et al.  Tense, Temporal Context, and Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution. , 1991 .

[33]  Marcel Adam Just,et al.  Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension , 1982 .

[34]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Verb frame preferences: Descriptive norms , 1984 .

[35]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Information-based syntax and semantics , 1987 .

[36]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Context effects in syntactic ambiguity resolution: discourse and semantic influences in parsing reduced relative clauses. , 1993, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[37]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. , 1982, Psychological review.

[38]  Curt Burgess,et al.  A Computational Model of Syntactic Ambiguity as a Lexical Process , 1989 .

[39]  W. Marslen-Wilson.  Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition , 1987, Cognition.

[40]  J. H. Steiger.  Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. , 1980 .

[41]  Lorraine K. Tyler,et al.  The role of lexical representations in language comprehension , 1989 .