Correlation between vortex structures and unsteady loads for flapping motion in hover

During the past decade, efforts were made to develop a new generation of unmanned aircrafts, qualified as Micro-Air Vehicles. The particularity of these systems resides in their maximum dimension limited to 15 cm, which, in terms of aerodynamics, corresponds to low Reynolds number flows (Re ≈ 102 to 104). At low Reynolds number, the concept of flapping wings seems to be an interesting alternative to the conventional fixed and rotary wings. Despite the fact that this concept may lead to enhanced lift forces and efficiency ratios, it allows hovering coupled with a low-noise generation. Previous studies (Dickinson et al. in Science 284:1954–1960, 1999) revealed that the flow engendered by flapping wings is highly vortical and unsteady, inducing significant temporal variations of the loads experienced by the airfoil. In order to enhance the aerodynamic performance of such flapping wings, it is essential to give further insight into the loads generating mechanisms by correlating the spatial and temporal evolution of the vortical structures together with the time-dependent lift and drag. In this paper, Time Resolved Particle Image Velocimetry is used as a basis to evaluate both unsteady forces and vortical structures generated by an airfoil undergoing complex motion (i.e. asymmetric flapping flight), through the momentum equation approach and a multidimensional wavelet-like vortex parameterization method, respectively. The momentum equation approach relies on the integration of flow variables inside and around a control volume surrounding the airfoil (Noca et al. in J Fluids Struct 11:345–350, 1997; Unal et al. in J Fluids Struct 11:965–971, 1997). Besides the direct link performed between the flow behavior and the force mechanisms, the load characterization is here non-intrusive and specifically convenient for flapping flight studies thanks to its low Reynolds flows’ sensitivity and adaptability to moving bodies. Results are supported by a vortex parameterization which evaluates the circulation of the multiple vortices generated in such complex flows. The temporal evolution of the loads matches the flow behavior and hence reveals the preponderant inertial force component and that due to vortical structures.

[1]  Jinhee Jeong,et al.  On the identification of a vortex , 1995, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[2]  C. Ellington.  The Aerodynamics of Hovering Insect Flight. I. The Quasi-Steady Analysis , 1984 .

[3]  F. Noca,et al.  A COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR EVALUATING TIME-DEPENDENT FLUID DYNAMIC FORCES ON BODIES, USING ONLY VELOCITY FIELDS AND THEIR DERIVATIVES , 1999 .

[4]  D. Rockwell,et al.  FORCE PREDICTION BY PIV IMAGING: A MOMENTUM-BASED APPROACH , 1997 .

[5]  L. Quartapelle,et al.  Force and moment in incompressible flows , 1983 .

[6]  Heinrich Vollmers,et al.  Detection of vortices and quantitative evaluation of their main parameters from experimental velocity data , 2001 .

[7]  J. Anthoine,et al.  Influence of adaptive control on vortex-driven instabilities in a scaled model of solid propellant motors , 2003 .

[8]  Flavio Noca,et al.  Measuring instantaneous fluid dynamic forces on bodies, using only velocity fields and their derivatives , 1997 .

[9]  Raman Sujith,et al.  An automated vortex detection scheme using the wavelet transform of the d2 field , 2008 .

[10]  D. Kurtulus,et al.  Aerodynamic characteristics of flapping motion in hover , 2007 .

[11]  Dickinson,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF WING ROTATION ON UNSTEADY AERODYNAMIC PERFORMANCE AT LOW REYNOLDS NUMBERS , 1994, The Journal of experimental biology.

[12]  M. Dickinson,et al.  The aerodynamic effects of wing rotation and a revised quasi-steady model of flapping flight. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[13]  G. Haller.  An objective definition of a vortex , 2004, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[14]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[15]  M. Dickinson,et al.  Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. , 1999, Science.

[16]  Fulvio Scarano,et al.  Evaluation of integral forces and pressure fields from planar velocimetry data for incompressible and compressible flows , 2007 .

[17]  M. Dickinson,et al.  UNSTEADY AERODYNAMIC PERFORMANCE OF MODEL WINGS AT LOW REYNOLDS NUMBERS , 1993 .

[18]  Bartosz Protas,et al.  An Effective Approach to Computation of Forces in Viscous Incompressible Flows , 2000 .

[19]  Patrick Rambaud,et al.  Wavelet based eddy structure eduction from a backward facing step flow investigated using particle image velocimetry , 2004 .

[20]  Dilek Funda Kurtulus,et al.  Unsteady aerodynamic forces estimation on a square cylinder by TR-PIV , 2007 .

[21]  M. S. Chong,et al.  A general classification of three-dimensional flow fields , 1990 .

[22]  Z. J. Wang,et al.  The role of drag in insect hovering , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[23]  James Lighthill,et al.  Fundamentals concerning wave loading on offshore structures , 1986, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[24]  Donald Rockwell,et al.  FORCE IDENTIFICATION BY VORTICITY FIELDS: TECHNIQUES BASED ON FLOW IMAGING , 1996 .