Interference in the processing of adjunct control

Recent research on the memory operations used in language comprehension has revealed a selective profile of interference effects during memory retrieval. Dependencies such as subject–verb agreement show strong facilitatory interference effects from structurally inappropriate but feature-matching distractors, leading to illusions of grammaticality (Pearlmutter et al., 1999; Wagers et al., 2009; Dillon et al., 2013). In contrast, dependencies involving reflexive anaphors are generally immune to interference effects (Sturt, 2003; Xiang et al., 2009; Dillon et al., 2013). This contrast has led to the proposal that all anaphors that are subject to structural constraints are immune to facilitatory interference. Here we use an animacy manipulation to examine whether adjunct control dependencies, which involve an interpreted anaphoric relation between a null subject and its licensor, are also immune to facilitatory interference effects. Our results show reliable facilitatory interference in the processing of adjunct control dependencies, which challenges the generalization that anaphoric dependencies as a class are immune to such effects. To account for the contrast between adjunct control and reflexive dependencies, we suggest that variability within anaphora could reflect either an inherent primacy of animacy cues in retrieval processes, or differential degrees of match between potential licensors and the retrieval probe.

[1]  Neal J. Pearlmutter,et al.  Hierarchy and scope of planning in subject–verb agreement production , 2011, Cognition.

[2]  M. Wagers.  The structure of memory meets memory for structure in linguistic cognition , 2008 .

[3]  D Swinney,et al.  The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension , 1989, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[4]  Sol Lagoa,et al.  Agreement Processes in Spanish Comprehension , 2014 .

[5]  S Borsky,et al.  The Temporal Unfolding of Local Acoustic Information and Sentence Context , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[6]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Agreement Processes in Sentence Comprehension , 1999 .

[7]  Colin Phillips,et al.  The structure-sensitivity of memory access: evidence from Mandarin Chinese , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[8]  Brian Dillon,et al.  Contrasting intrusion profiles for agreement and anaphora: Experimental and modeling evidence , 2013 .

[9]  C. Clifton,et al.  Feature manipulation in sentence comprehension , 2008 .

[10]  Colin Phillips,et al.  Aligning Grammatical Theories and Language Processing Models , 2014, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research.

[11]  Shravan Vasishth,et al.  Retrieval interference in reflexive processing: experimental evidence from Mandarin, and computational modeling , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[12]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2006 .

[13]  Colin Phillips,et al.  5: Grammatical Illusions and Selective Fallibility in Real-Time Language Comprehension , 2011 .

[14]  Nayoung Kwon,et al.  The use of control information in dependency formation: An eye-tracking study , 2014 .

[15]  Harald Clahsen,et al.  Children's Processing of Reflexives and Pronouns in English: Evidence from Eye-movements During Listening , 2011 .

[16]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The fan effect: New results and new theories. , 1999 .

[17]  P. Sturt,et al.  The time-course of the application of binding constraints in reference resolution , 2003 .

[18]  A. Staub.  On the interpretation of the number attraction effect: Response time evidence. , 2009, Journal of memory and language.

[19]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  An Activation-Based Model of Sentence Processing as Skilled Memory Retrieval , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[20]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[21]  Shravan Vasishth,et al.  Teasing apart retrieval and encoding interference in the processing of anaphors , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[22]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[23]  I. Landau.  Elements of control : structure and meaning in infinitival constructions , 1999 .

[24]  B. McElree,et al.  Cue-dependent interference in comprehension. , 2011 .

[25]  Adrian Staub,et al.  Response time distributional evidence for distinct varieties of number attraction , 2010, Cognition.

[26]  Brian Dillon,et al.  Structured access in sentence comprehension , 2011 .

[27]  E. Matthew Husband,et al.  Misinterpretations in agreement and agreement attraction , 2016, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[28]  C. Phillips,et al.  Illusory licensing effects across dependency types: ERP evidence , 2009, Brain and Language.

[29]  Josefa N. S. Pandeirada,et al.  Adaptive memory: animacy processing produces mnemonic advantages. , 2013, Experimental psychology.

[30]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  Distinguishing effects of structure and decay on attachment and repair: A cue-based parsing account of recovery from misanalyzed ambiguities , 2003 .

[31]  Stephani Foraker,et al.  Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension , 2003 .

[32]  D. Bates,et al.  Linear Mixed-Effects Models using 'Eigen' and S4 , 2015 .

[33]  J. V. Van Dyke.  Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[34]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  Processing Polarity: How the Ungrammatical Intrudes on the Grammatical , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[35]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  Agreement Attraction in Comprehension: Representations and Processes. , 2009 .

[36]  H. Schlosberg,et al.  Octave generalization, pitch discrimination, and loudness thresholds in the white rat. , 1943 .

[37]  Paul McKellips,et al.  Good enough , 2013, Lab Animal.

[38]  Colin Phillips,et al.  Immediate sensitivity to structural constraints in pronoun resolution , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[39]  B. McElree,et al.  Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension. , 2006, Journal of memory and language.

[40]  Jan Svartvik,et al.  A __ comprehensive grammar of the English language , 1988 .

[41]  Patrick Sturt,et al.  The processing of raising and nominal control: an eye-tracking study , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[42]  Kevin S. Autry,et al.  A fan effect in anaphor processing: effects of multiple distractors , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[43]  John R. Anderson.  Retrieval of propositional information from long-term memory , 1974 .

[44]  Fernanda Ferreira,et al.  The 'Good Enough' Approach to Language Comprehension , 2007, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[45]  S. Kennison,et al.  Comprehending Pronouns: A Role for Word-Specific Gender Stereotype Information , 2003, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[46]  W. Badecker,et al.  The processing role of structural constraints on the interpretation of pronouns and anaphors. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[47]  Norbert Hornstein.  Chapter 1. On Control , 2008 .

[48]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[49]  H. Harley,et al.  Person and Number in Pronouns: A Feature-Geometric Analysis , 2002 .

[50]  Noriko Kawasaki,et al.  Control and arbitrary interpretation in English , 1993 .

[51]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  Early retrieval interference in syntax-guided antecedent search , 2009 .

[52]  J. V. Van Dyke.  Cue-dependent interference in comprehension. , 2011, Journal of memory and language.

[53]  James M. LeBreton,et al.  Adaptive Memory , 2013, Psychological science.

[54]  J. S. Nairne.  A feature model of immediate memory , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[55]  Douglas Saddy,et al.  Processing Negative Polarity Items: When Negation Comes Through the Backdoor , 2005 .

[56]  J. S. Nairne,et al.  A framework for interpreting recency effects in immediate serial recall , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[57]  B McElree,et al.  Sentence Comprehension Is Mediated by Content-Addressable Memory Structures , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[58]  B. Mittelman,et al.  On control. , 1979, Dental management.

[59]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Feature manipulation in sentence comprehension: 2703 , 1999 .

[60]  Daniel C. Richardson,et al.  Effects of merely local syntactic coherence on sentence processing , 2004 .

[61]  Laurel Brehm,et al.  The time-course of feature interference in agreement comprehension: Multiple mechanisms and asymmetrical attraction. , 2014, Journal of memory and language.

[62]  Barbara Steiner,et al.  The 'Good Enough' , 2001, Afterall: A Journal of Art, Context and Enquiry.

[63]  Ali Idrissi,et al.  Representing number in the real-time processing of agreement: self-paced reading evidence from Arabic , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[64]  J. A. Dyke.  Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing. , 2007 .

[65]  D. Barr.  Random effects structure for testing interactions in linear mixed-effects models , 2013, Front. Psychol..