Using Machine Learning to Test Causal Hypotheses in Conjoint Analysis
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] T. Speed,et al. On the Application of Probability Theory to Agricultural Experiments. Essay on Principles. Section 9 , 1990 .
[2] Kosuke Imai,et al. Experimental Evaluation of Individualized Treatment Rules , 2019, Journal of the American Statistical Association.
[3] Chiara Sabatti,et al. Causal inference in genetic trio studies , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[4] Benjamin L. Campbell,et al. Consumer Preferences for Peach Attributes: Market Segmentation Analysis and Implications for New Marketing Strategies , 2013, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.
[5] E. Candès,et al. The phase transition for the existence of the maximum likelihood estimate in high-dimensional logistic regression , 2018, The Annals of Statistics.
[6] Denes Szucs,et al. A Tutorial on Hunting Statistical Significance by Chasing N , 2016, Front. Psychol..
[7] Jens Hainmueller,et al. Public Attitudes toward Immigration , 2014 .
[8] Economic Reasoning with a Racial Hue: Is the Immigration Consensus Purely Race Neutral? , 2019, The Journal of Politics.
[9] Lisa A Prosser,et al. Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete-Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force. , 2016, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.
[10] Lucas Janson,et al. Fast and powerful conditional randomization testing via distillation. , 2020, Biometrika.
[11] Kosuke Imai,et al. Estimating Heterogeneous Causal Effects of High-Dimensional Treatments: Application to Conjoint Analysis , 2022 .
[12] The Ties that Double Bind: Social Roles and Women's Underrepresentation in Politics , 2017 .
[13] R. Tibshirani,et al. A LASSO FOR HIERARCHICAL INTERACTIONS. , 2012, Annals of statistics.
[14] Daniel J. Hopkins,et al. Beyond the breaking point? Survey satisficing in conjoint experiments , 2017, Political Science Research and Methods.
[15] K. Imai,et al. Causal Interaction in Factorial Experiments: Application to Conjoint Analysis , 2018, Journal of the American Statistical Association.
[16] Paul E. Green,et al. Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice , 1990 .
[17] Paul E. Green,et al. Thirty Years of Conjoint Analysis: Reflections and Prospects , 2001, Interfaces.
[18] C. Andrade. HARKing, Cherry-Picking, P-Hacking, Fishing Expeditions, and Data Dredging and Mining as Questionable Research Practices. , 2021, The Journal of clinical psychiatry.
[19] J. I. The Design of Experiments , 1936, Nature.
[20] N. Meinshausen,et al. High-Dimensional Inference: Confidence Intervals, $p$-Values and R-Software hdi , 2014, 1408.4026.
[21] Milan Martic,et al. Using Conjoint Analysis To Elicit Employers’ Preferences Toward Key Competencies For A Business Manager Position , 2012 .
[22] Damaraju Raghavarao,et al. Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis: Models and Designs , 2010 .
[23] R. Luce,et al. Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement , 1964 .
[24] Daniel J. Hopkins,et al. The Number of Choice Tasks and Survey Satisficing in Conjoint Experiments , 2017, Political Analysis.
[25] Haoran Zhang,et al. The Holdout Randomization Test: Principled and Easy Black Box Feature Selection , 2018, 1811.00645.
[26] K. Imai,et al. Improving the External Validity of Conjoint Analysis: The Essential Role of Profile Distribution , 2021, Political Analysis.
[27] Jens Hainmueller,et al. The Hidden American Immigration Consensus: A Conjoint Analysis of Attitudes Toward Immigrants , 2012 .
[28] Scott F. Abramson,et al. What Do We Learn about Voter Preferences from Conjoint Experiments? , 2022, American Journal of Political Science.
[29] Stefano Barone,et al. A weighted logistic regression for conjoint analysis and Kansei engineering , 2007, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..
[30] Daniel J. Hopkins,et al. Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments , 2013, Political Analysis.
[31] P. Aronow. A General Method for Detecting Interference Between Units in Randomized Experiments , 2010 .
[32] Lucas Janson,et al. Panning for gold: ‘model‐X’ knockoffs for high dimensional controlled variable selection , 2016, 1610.02351.
[33] Kirk Bansak,et al. Using Conjoint Experiments to Analyze Elections: The Essential Role of the Average Marginal Component Effect (AMCE) , 2020 .
[34] G. Imbens,et al. Exact p-Values for Network Interference , 2015, 1506.02084.
[35] Barry C. Burden,et al. The Contingent Effects of Candidate Sex on Voter Choice , 2019 .