Revealing Molecular Adversaries of Human Health Using Advanced Imaging Technology

Single particle electron microscopy (EM) allows us to examine the molecular world and gain insights into protein structures implicated in human disease. Visualizing the 3D architecture of the macromolecules can inform drug design and preventative care. While X-ray crystallography and NMR are able to resolve atomic structures, the methodology is better suited for smaller structures with limited flexibility. Single particle EM allows us analyze larger structures that have inherent flexibility. Protein structures can broadly be categorized as symmetry or asymmetric. There are computational advantages when analyzing symmetrical structures. Specifically, structural information can be extrapolated from fewer vantage points. Thus, symmetrical macromolecules are an advantageous for pioneering new methodologies in single particle EM. Rotavirus double layered particles (DLPs) are large macromolecular complexes that display icosahedral symmetry. Previous studies have led to a high resolution structure of transcriptionally inactive rotavirus frozen in time. However, to more fully understand rotavirus we need to examine the structure under transcriptionally active conditions. To expand our understanding, we first evaluated these viral assemblies using cryo-EM under active and inactive conditions. We found both internal and external structural differences. Based on these findings we sought to further our understanding of these nano-machines by developing a liquid cell environment to evaluate their dynamics over time. Our research not only developed a new methodology to evaluate active particles over time, we also found that the mobility of the DLPs were directly correlated to the level of transcriptional activity. When analyzing asymmetrical and flexible protein complexes previous studies have utilized methodologies to limit the proteins’ conformational variability. While this does allow for a higher resolution structure, it limits our understanding to a specific orientation and compromises the biological insights. BRCA1 is an asymmetric protein containing a large flexible region and is important in the prevention of breast cancer. We utilize silicon nitride microchips with integrated wells and decorated with a lipid monolayer to capture and image BRCA1 complexes. This imaging platform minimizes heterogeneity and ensures the sample quality while not biasing confirmation. Thus, allowing for high resolution cryo-EM imaging of flexible native proteins. We were able to examine BRCA1 complexes from cells at both the primary and metastatic sites. Our ability to visualize these proteins in their native form provide insights into the variability of BRCA1 in disease progression. We found that BRCA1 complexes isolated from metastatic cells have additional density in the C-terminal domain. Our data suggests this density it due an interaction with p53. Overall, our methodologies highlight the power of single particle EM for studying protein complexes. Furthermore, our findings emphasize the importance of examining protein complexes in their native state. Revealing Molecular Adversaries of Human Health Using Advanced Imaging Technology A. Cameron Varano GENERAL AUDIENCE ABSTRACT Single particle electron microscopy (EM) allows us to examine the molecular world and gain insights into protein structures implicated in human disease. Visualizing the 3D architecture of macromolecules can inform drug design and preventative care. While X-ray crystallography and NMR are able to resolve atomic structures, the methodology is better suited for smaller structures with limited flexibility. Single particle EM allow us analyze larger structures that have inherent flexibility. Protein structures can broadly be categorized as symmetry or asymmetric. There are computational advantages when analyzing symmetrical structures. Specifically, structural information can be extrapolated from fewer vantage points. Thus, symmetrical macromolecules are an advantageous for pioneering new methodologies in single particle EM. Rotavirus double layered particles (DLPs) are large, highly symmetrical macromolecular complexes that represent an ideal model system for developing technology. Previous studies have led to a high resolution structure of inactive rotavirus DLP frozen in time. However, to more fully understand rotavirus we need to examine the structure under active conditions. To expand our understanding, we first evaluated these viral assemblies using cryo-EM under active and inactive conditions. We found structural differences. Based on these findings we sought to further our understanding of these nano-machines by developing a liquid cell environment to evaluate their dynamics over time. Our new methodology revealed new insights into the mobility of the DLPs. When analyzing asymmetrical and flexible protein complexes previous studies have utilized methodologies to limit the proteins’ movement. While this does allow for a higher resolution structure, it limits our understanding to a specific orientation and compromises the biological insights. BRCA1 is a highly flexible asymmetric protein implicated in the development of breast cancer. We utilize specialized microchips to capture and image BRCA1 complexes. This imaging platform ensures sample quality and allows for high resolution cryoEM imaging of flexible native proteins. We were able to examine BRCA1 complexes from cells at both the primary and metastatic sites. Our ability to visualize these proteins in their native form provide insights into the variability of BRCA1 in disease progression. Our data found that BRCA1 complexes isolated from metastatic cells are structurally different than those at the primary site. Overall, our methodologies highlight the power of single particle EM for studying protein complexes. Furthermore, our findings emphasize the importance of examining protein complexes in their native state.

[1]  N. Grigorieff,et al.  Ab initio resolution measurement for single particle structures. , 2007, Journal of structural biology.

[2]  J. R. Tanner,et al.  Structural dynamics of viral nanomachines , 2014 .

[3]  J. R. Tanner,et al.  A Molecular Toolkit to Visualize Native Protein Assemblies in the Context of Human Disease , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[4]  R. Nussinov,et al.  "Similarity trap" in protein-protein interactions could be carcinogenic: simulations of p53 core domain complexed with 53BP1 and BRCA1 BRCT domains. , 2006, Structure.

[5]  X. Cui,et al.  Intragenic motifs regulate the transcriptional complexity of Pkhd1/PKHD1 , 2014, Journal of Molecular Medicine.

[6]  Deborah F. Kelly,et al.  On the freezing and identification of lipid monolayer 2-D arrays for cryoelectron microscopy. , 2007, Journal of structural biology.

[7]  J. R. Tanner,et al.  Visualizing viral assemblies in a nanoscale biosphere. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[8]  R Henderson,et al.  Electronic detectors for electron microscopy. , 2007, Current opinion in structural biology.

[9]  Deborah F. Kelly,et al.  Real-time visualization of nanoparticles interacting with glioblastoma stem cells. , 2015, Nano letters.

[10]  A Leith,et al.  SPIDER and WEB: processing and visualization of images in 3D electron microscopy and related fields. , 1996, Journal of structural biology.

[11]  Martin Karplus,et al.  Normal mode calculations of icosahedral viruses with full dihedral flexibility by use of molecular symmetry. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  Robert M Glaeser,et al.  How good can cryo-EM become? , 2015, Nature Methods.

[13]  Guan-qing Wu,et al.  Polycystin-2 Expression Is Regulated by a PC2-binding Domain in the Intracellular Portion of Fibrocystin* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  Won Chul Lee,et al.  Direct observation of nanoparticle superlattice formation by using liquid cell transmission electron microscopy. , 2012, ACS nano.

[15]  L. Guay-Woodford Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease: The prototype of the hepato-renal fibrocystic diseases , 2014, Journal of Pediatric Genetics.

[16]  Deborah F. Kelly,et al.  Preparation of Tunable Microchips to Visualize Native Protein Complexes for Single-Particle Electron Microscopy. , 2018, Methods in molecular biology.

[17]  Deborah F. Kelly,et al.  A microchip platform for structural oncology applications , 2016, npj Breast Cancer.

[18]  Henning Urlaub,et al.  GraFix: sample preparation for single-particle electron cryomicroscopy , 2008, Nature Methods.

[19]  Madeline,et al.  Cryo-SiN – An Alternative Substrate to Visualize Active Viral Assemblies , 2016 .

[20]  C. Yang,et al.  Cryo-EM structure of a transcribing cypovirus , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  R. Young,et al.  BRCA1 is a component of the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Sjors H.W. Scheres,et al.  A Bayesian View on Cryo-EM Structure Determination , 2012, 2012 9th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).

[23]  S. Harrison,et al.  Near-atomic resolution using electron cryomicroscopy and single-particle reconstruction , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  M. King,et al.  Mapping the Functional Domains of BRCA1 , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[25]  Georges Mer,et al.  The BRCT Domain Is a Phospho-Protein Binding Domain , 2003, Science.

[26]  Mutsuko Ouchi,et al.  BRCA1 phosphorylation by Aurora-A in the regulation of G2 to M transition. , 2015, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[27]  R. Glaeser,et al.  Electron Diffraction of Frozen, Hydrated Protein Crystals , 1974, Science.

[28]  M. Estes,et al.  Emerging themes in rotavirus cell entry, genome organization, transcription and replication. , 2004, Virus research.

[29]  B. Prasad,et al.  Structure of rotavirus. , 1994, Current topics in microbiology and immunology.

[30]  Christopher E. Berndsen,et al.  New insights into ubiquitin E3 ligase mechanism , 2014, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[31]  S. Fang,et al.  RING fingers mediate ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (E2)-dependent ubiquitination. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Sjors H.W. Scheres,et al.  Semi-automated selection of cryo-EM particles in RELION-1.3 , 2015, Journal of structural biology.

[33]  S. M. McDonald,et al.  Structural insights into the coupling of virion assembly and rotavirus replication , 2012, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[34]  D. Peckys,et al.  Silicon nitride windows for electron microscopy of whole cells , 2011, Journal of microscopy.

[35]  Conrad C. Huang,et al.  UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[36]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Structure of an XRCC1 BRCT domain: a new protein–protein interaction module , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[37]  C. Bugg,et al.  Structure of ubiquitin refined at 1.8 A resolution. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[38]  Steven P Gygi,et al.  Abraxas and RAP80 Form a BRCA1 Protein Complex Required for the DNA Damage Response , 2007, Science.

[39]  Daniel J. Hellebusch,et al.  High-Resolution EM of Colloidal Nanocrystal Growth Using Graphene Liquid Cells , 2012, Science.

[40]  S. Gullans,et al.  An osmotically tolerant inner medullary collecting duct cell line from an SV40 transgenic mouse. , 1993, The American journal of physiology.

[41]  Deborah F. Kelly,et al.  Improved Microchip Design and Application for In Situ Transmission Electron Microscopy of Macromolecules , 2013, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[42]  M. Estes,et al.  Three-dimensional visualization of mRNA release from actively transcribing rotavirus particles , 1997, Nature Structural Biology.

[43]  Rachel E. Klevit,et al.  Structure of a BRCA1–BARD1 heterodimeric RING–RING complex , 2001, Nature Structural Biology.

[44]  M. Estes,et al.  Comparative structural analysis of transcriptionally competent and incompetent rotavirus-antibody complexes. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  S. M. McDonald RNA synthetic mechanisms employed by diverse families of RNA viruses , 2013, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA.

[46]  P. Ortoleva,et al.  Viral structural transition mechanisms revealed by multiscale molecular dynamics/order parameter extrapolation simulation. , 2010, Biopolymers.

[47]  Junjie Chen,et al.  DNA Damage-Induced Cell Cycle Checkpoint Control Requires CtIP, a Phosphorylation-Dependent Binding Partner of BRCA1 C-Terminal Domains , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[48]  Clinton S Potter,et al.  Cryomesh™: A New Substrate for Cryo-Electron Microscopy , 2010, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[49]  J. R. Tanner,et al.  Tunable Substrates Improve Imaging of Viruses and Cancer Proteins , 2017, Microscopy Today.

[50]  D. J. De Rosier,et al.  Reconstruction of Three Dimensional Structures from Electron Micrographs , 1968, Nature.

[51]  Peter C Searson,et al.  Quantifying electrochemical nucleation and growth of nanoscale clusters using real-time kinetic data. , 2006, Nano letters.

[52]  Robert M Glaeser,et al.  Retrospective on the early development of cryoelectron microscopy of macromolecules and a prospective on opportunities for the future. , 2008, Journal of structural biology.

[53]  Sjors H.W. Scheres,et al.  RELION: Implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination , 2012, Journal of structural biology.

[54]  S. J. Campbell,et al.  Comparison of the structures and peptide binding specificities of the BRCT domains of MDC1 and BRCA1. , 2010, Structure.

[55]  J. Frank Three-Dimensional Electron Microscopy of Macromolecular Assemblies: Visualization of Biological Molecules in Their Native State , 1996 .

[56]  J. Dubochet,et al.  Electron microscopy of frozen water and aqueous solutions , 1982 .

[57]  D. Livingston,et al.  Structure of the 53BP1 BRCT region bound to p53 and its comparison to the Brca1 BRCT structure. , 2002, Genes & development.

[58]  J. R. Tanner,et al.  The development of affinity capture devices—a nanoscale purification platform for biological in situ transmission electron microscopy , 2012 .

[59]  S. Harrison,et al.  Location of the dsRNA-dependent polymerase, VP1, in rotavirus particles. , 2012, Journal of molecular biology.

[60]  Peer Bork,et al.  A superfamily of conserved domains in DNA damage‐ responsive cell cycle checkpoint proteins , 1997, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[61]  M. King,et al.  Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risks Due to Inherited Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 , 2003, Science.

[62]  P. Friedman,et al.  The p53 protein is an unusually shaped tetramer that binds directly to DNA. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[63]  Deborah F. Kelly,et al.  RETRACTED: Structural analysis of BRCA1 reveals modification hotspot , 2017, Science Advances.

[64]  M. Kitayner,et al.  Structural basis of DNA recognition by p53 tetramers. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[65]  L. Strong,et al.  Germ line p53 mutations in a familial syndrome of breast cancer, sarcomas, and other neoplasms. , 1990, Science.

[66]  J. Wade Harper,et al.  Drug discovery in the ubiquitin–proteasome system , 2006, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[67]  J. Mornon,et al.  From BRCA1 to RAP1: a widespread BRCT module closely associated with DNA repair , 1997, FEBS letters.

[68]  W. Kühlbrandt,et al.  Electron cryo-microscopy of biological specimens on conductive titanium-silicon metal glass films. , 2008, Ultramicroscopy.

[69]  N. de Jonge,et al.  Microfluidic System for Transmission Electron Microscopy , 2010, Microscopy and Microanalysis.