Investigation of gaze patterns in daylit workplaces: using eye-tracking methods to objectify view direction as a function of lighting conditions

Despite numerous efforts in developing glare indices through human assessment studies, predicting visual comfort in indoor environments still poses important challenges in design. A major limitation in discomfort glare indices is that they all ignore its dependencies on view direction. In this study we adopted eye-tracking methods in a series of human assessment experiments in order to record actual visual response when experiencing discomfort glare. We set up an experiment where the view directions distributions were monitored as the participants were working in a side-lit office with three different task-supports - monitor, paper and phone - on a standardized office task sequence. The participants were allocated randomly to two groups where they were exposed to two different views from the window. The results show that the “view outside the window” is the main determinant of view direction bias whenever the participant is not focused on any cognitive or visual office task procedure.

[1]  Philipp Sury,et al.  A first step on eye movements in office settings. , 2011 .

[2]  Glenn A. Fry,et al.  The Pupillary Response and Discomfort Glare , 1975 .

[3]  S. K. Guth,et al.  Brightnesses in visual field at borderline between comfort and discomfort. , 1949, Illuminating engineering.

[4]  Vítor Leal,et al.  Influence of shading control patterns on the energy assessment of office spaces , 2012 .

[5]  Christoph F. Reinhart,et al.  The ‘adaptive zone’ – A concept for assessing discomfort glare throughout daylit spaces , 2012 .

[6]  Steve Fotios,et al.  Human Factors in Lighting, 3rd ed. , 2015 .

[7]  P. R. Tregenza,et al.  View and discomfort glare from windows , 2007 .

[8]  J. Veitch Psychological Processes Influencing Lighting Quality , 2001 .

[9]  Hyunjoo Han,et al.  The position index of a glare source at the borderline between comfort and discomfort (BCD) in the whole visual field , 2009 .

[10]  Jennifer A. Veitch,et al.  Task Lighting Effects on Office Worker Satisfaction and Performance, and Energy Efficiency , 2005 .

[11]  J. J. Vos Reflections on glare , 2003 .

[12]  P. T. Stone,et al.  A model for the explanation of discomfort and pain in the eye caused by light , 2009 .

[13]  Percy W. Cobb,et al.  Four fundamental factors in vision , 1928 .

[14]  Michael Sivak,et al.  Discomfort glare is task dependent , 1991 .

[15]  Robert Clear,et al.  Discomfort glare: What do we actually know? , 2013 .

[16]  Ann R. Webb,et al.  Considerations for lighting in the built environment: Non-visual effects of light , 2006 .

[17]  Ian L. Bailey,et al.  An Objective Measure of Discomfort Glare , 1994 .

[18]  I. L. Bailey,et al.  Discomfort from glare: The role of pupillary hippus† , 1993 .

[19]  Ahmet Çakir,et al.  Human Factors in Lighting , 2014, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[20]  Jan Wienold,et al.  Evaluation methods and development of a new glare prediction model for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras , 2006 .

[21]  Stefan Kohlbecher,et al.  BASIC AND CLINICAL ASPECTS OF VERTIGO AND DIZZINESS EyeSeeCam: An Eye Movement–Driven Head Camera for the Examination of Natural Visual Exploration , 2009 .

[22]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of Reading in Normal and Low Vision , 2006 .

[23]  Werner Osterhaus,et al.  Discomfort glare assessment and prevention for daylight applications in office environments , 2005 .