Understanding user representations, a new development path for supporting Smart City policy: Evaluation of the electric car use in Lorraine Region

Today electric car and Smart Grid are potential elements of any ‘Smart City’ initiative. According to several recent studies, French citizens are ready to purchase an electric car. Despite of these positive figures, sales of the electric cars are not really taking-off, but slightly increasing. Although, previous studies have identified motivation and barriers for the diffusion of electric cars (EC), we hypothesise, that the analysis of the a priori knowledge of the actors, in particular the users, can be enriched and it will provide a new understanding of the spread of EC. However, there is no studies explaining the types of representations people have of the EC, particularly for non-users, in order to have a better consideration of individuals, not so much as consumers or users, but rather as citizens. Thus, this paper explores the determining factors that determine how social groups perceive the emerging technology of EC and thus provide elements about a potential acceptability enabling its dissemination. In order to achieve this, this paper proposes a new approach based on the use of the AttrakDiff-2 questionnaire, a specific User eXperience (UX) method. This method assesses four different but complementary aspects of the social representation: the possibility of action of the subject on the system; the stimulation, caused, by the system; how the user will identify with the system and, the overall attraction. Data about the social representations of electric car for 131 potential users in the Lorraine Region of France were collected and analysed. Results show that there are differences of user representation regarding the socio-demographic variables. The proposed approach will provide relevant inputs to the infrastructure network design and Smart City policy decision makers.

[1]  Bernard Blandin Des hommes et des objets - Esquisses pour une sociologie avec objets , 2001 .

[2]  B. Sovacool Experts, theories, and electric mobility transitions: Toward an integrated conceptual framework for the adoption of electric vehicles , 2017 .

[3]  Sébastien Petit,et al.  Le processus de dépendance automobile au Grand-Duché de Luxembourg , 2007 .

[4]  Lieven De Marez,et al.  The Challenge of User- and QoE-Centric Research and Product Development in Today's ICT-Environment , 1970 .

[5]  Laure Morel,et al.  Innovative public-private partnership to support Smart City: the case of “Chaire REVES” , 2015 .

[6]  Lawrence A. Brown,et al.  Innovation Diffusion: A New Perspective , 1984 .

[7]  E. Hippel,et al.  Lead users: a source of novel product concepts , 1986 .

[8]  Christophe Midler,et al.  Du véhicule électrique à l’électromobilité , 2015 .

[9]  J. Ord,et al.  Spatial Diffusion: An Historical Geography of Epidemics in an Island Community , 1981 .

[10]  Iqbal Husain,et al.  Electric and hybrid vehicles : design fundamentals , 2003 .

[11]  Marc Hassenzahl,et al.  MARC HASSENZAHL CHAPTER 3 The Thing and I: Understanding the Relationship Between User and Product , 2003 .

[12]  Gerardo Marletto,et al.  Car and the city: Socio-technical transition pathways to 2030 , 2014 .

[13]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[14]  Jukka Holm,et al.  A Virtual World Prototype for Interacting with a Music Collection , 2011, HCI.

[15]  Ivo Düntsch,et al.  The IsoMetrics usability inventory: An operationalization of ISO 9241-10 supporting summative and formative evaluation of software systems , 1999, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[16]  Emmanuel O. C. Mkpojiogu,et al.  Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and perceived enjoyment as drivers for the user acceptance of interactive mobile maps , 2016 .

[17]  Eric Daudé,et al.  Modélisation de la diffusion d'innovations par la simulation multi-agents. L'exemple d'une innovation en milieu rural. , 2002 .

[18]  Martin Schrepp,et al.  The influence of hedonic quality on the attractiveness of user interfaces of business management software , 2006, Interact. Comput..

[19]  Andrea Caragliu,et al.  Smart innovative cities: The impact of Smart City policies on urban innovation , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[20]  Alexander Thayer,et al.  Achieving design enlightenment: Defining a new user experience measurement framework , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference.

[21]  S. Moscovici La psychanalyse, son image et son public , 2004 .

[22]  Antti Oulasvirta,et al.  Everyday appropriations of information technology: A study of creative uses of digital cameras , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[23]  Alexander Richter,et al.  Exploring Appropriation of Enterprise Wikis: , 2012, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[24]  Julien Hubert Intégration du point de vue de l’usager et du citoyen dans le processus d’innovation : le cas du déploiement d’un dispositif de mobilité électrique dans le Sillon Lorrain , 2017 .

[25]  Miguel Ortega-Mier,et al.  A grey-DEcision-MAking Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) analysis on the barriers between environmentally friendly products and consumers: practitioners' viewpoints on the European automobile industry , 2016 .

[26]  Marjolein C. Achterkamp,et al.  Diffusing (let it happen) or disseminating (make it happen) innovations in health care , 2013 .

[27]  Marie-Axelle Granié,et al.  Social representations associated with men and women drivers among French adolescents and adults. Effects of the perceiver's age, sex, and socioeconomic status , 2015 .

[28]  S. Moscovici Notes towards a description of Social Representations , 1988 .

[29]  Mehmet Efe Biresselioglu,et al.  Electric mobility in Europe: A comprehensive review of motivators and barriers in decision making processes , 2018 .

[30]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[31]  Virpi Roto,et al.  USER EXPERIENCE WHITE PAPER Bringing clarity to the concept of user experience , 2011 .

[32]  Laure Morel,et al.  The role of mock-ups in the anticipation of the user experience within a living lab: An empirical study , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation/ International Technology Management Conference (ICE/ITMC).

[33]  E. von Hippel,et al.  Sources of Innovation , 2016 .

[34]  Carine Lallemand Towards consolidated methods for the design and evaluation of user experience , 2015 .

[35]  S. Moscovici,et al.  2. Des représentations collectives aux représentations sociales : éléments pour une histoire , 2003 .

[36]  Jackie Fenn,et al.  Mastering the Hype Cycle: How to Choose the Right Innovation at the Right Time , 2008 .

[37]  Shadi Sadeghian,et al.  Développer la mobilité électrique : des projets d’acteurs au projet de territoire , 2013 .

[38]  Iqbal Husain Electric and Hybrid Vehicles: Design Fundamentals, Second Edition , 2010 .

[39]  G. Gronier,et al.  Création et validation d’une version française du questionnaire AttrakDiff pour l’évaluation de l’expérience utilisateur des systèmes interactifs , 2015 .

[40]  G. Robert,et al.  Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. , 2004, The Milbank quarterly.

[41]  Samuel Carpentier,et al.  Une analyse exploratoire des liens entre mobilité quotidienne et ancrage résidentiel. Vers une approche écologique de la mobilité , 2011 .

[42]  M. Thüring,et al.  Usability, aesthetics and emotions in human–technology interaction , 2007 .

[43]  Laurent Dupont,et al.  Use as essential factor for Technology Adoption: Case study of electric vehi cle’s uses in French regional Ecosystem , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation/IEEE lnternational Technology Management Conference (ICE/ITMC).

[44]  Gunnar Stevens,et al.  Supporting the Collaborative Appropriation of an Open Software Ecosystem , 2011, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[45]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[46]  Victor Mester Conception Optimale Systémique des Composants des Chaînes de Traction Electrique , 2007 .

[47]  K. Rennings Redefining innovation -- eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics , 2000 .

[48]  Rex Hartson,et al.  The UX book, process and guidelines for ensuring a quality user experience by Rex Hartson and Pardha S. Pyla , 2012, SOEN.

[49]  Sjoerd Bakker,et al.  Technological hype and disappointment: lessons from the hydrogen and fuel cell case , 2012, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[50]  Mark Blythe,et al.  Funology:From Usability to Enjoyment , 2003 .

[51]  Michael Burmester,et al.  AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität , 2003, MuC.

[52]  Michael Minge,et al.  meCUE - Ein modularer Fragebogen zur Erfassung des Nutzungserlebens , 2013, MuC.

[53]  Martin Schrepp,et al.  Construction and Evaluation of a User Experience Questionnaire , 2008, USAB.

[54]  A. Mahizhnan Smart cities: The Singapore case , 1999 .

[55]  Pieter Verdegem,et al.  Rethinking determinants of ICT acceptance: Towards an integrated and comprehensive overview , 2011 .

[56]  Gérald Gaglio,et al.  Sociologie de l'innovation , 2011 .

[57]  R. Mansell Prothero Spatial Diffusion: An Historical Geography of Epidemics in an Island Community. By A. D. Cliff, P. Haggett, J. K. Ord and G. R. Versey. Pp. xi + 238. (Cambridge University Press, 1981.) £19.50. , 1984 .

[58]  Sascha Mahlke,et al.  User Experience of Interaction with Technical Systems , 2008 .

[59]  Jillian Anable,et al.  The role of instrumental, hedonic and symbolic attributes in the intention to adopt electric vehicles , 2013 .

[60]  P. Mannoni Les représentations sociales , 2003 .

[61]  Carine Lallemand,et al.  Méthodes de design UX : 30 méthodes fondamentales pour concevoir et évaluer les systèmes interactifs , 2015 .