Use FlowRepository to share your clinical data upon study publication

A fundamental tenet of scientific research is that published results including underlying data should be open to independent validation and refutation. Data sharing encourages collaboration, facilitates quality and reduces redundancy in data production. Authors submitting manuscripts to several journals have already adopted the habit of sharing their underlying flow cytometry data by deposition to FlowRepository—a data repository that is jointly supported by the International Society for Advancement of Cytometry, the International Clinical Cytometry Society and the European Society for Clinical Cell Analysis. De‐identification is required for publishing data from clinical studies and we discuss ways to satisfy data sharing requirements and patient privacy requirements simultaneously. Scientific communities in the fields of microarray, proteomics, and sequencing have been benefiting from reuse and re‐exploration of data in public repositories for over decade. We believe it is time that clinicians follow suit and that de‐identified clinical data also become routinely available along with published cytometry‐based findings. © 2016 International Clinical Cytometry Society

[1]  John P. A. Ioannidis,et al.  Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature , 2016, PLoS biology.

[2]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Reproducibility in Science: Improving the Standard for Basic and Preclinical Research , 2015, Circulation research.

[3]  Jeffrey A. Wiser,et al.  ImmPort: disseminating data to the public for the future of immunology , 2014, Immunologic Research.

[4]  Raphael Gottardo,et al.  Computational resources for high-dimensional immune analysis from the Human Immunology Project Consortium , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[5]  Raphael Gottardo,et al.  Comparability and reproducibility of biomedical data , 2012, Briefings Bioinform..

[6]  Josef Spidlen,et al.  FlowRepository: A resource of annotated flow cytometry datasets associated with peer‐reviewed publications , 2012, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[7]  Josef Spidlen,et al.  Preparing a Minimum Information about a Flow Cytometry Experiment (MIFlowCyt) Compliant Manuscript Using the International Society for Advancement of Cytometry (ISAC) FCS File Repository (FlowRepository.org) , 2012, Current protocols in cytometry.

[8]  K. El Emam,et al.  Methods for the de-identification of electronic health records for genomic research , 2011, Genome Medicine.

[9]  Yu Qian,et al.  Toward an ontology-based framework for clinical research databases , 2011, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[10]  Nikesh Kotecha,et al.  Web‐Based Analysis and Publication of Flow Cytometry Experiments , 2010, Current protocols in cytometry.

[11]  James C S Wood,et al.  Data File Standard for Flow Cytometry, version FCS 3.1 , 2009, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[12]  Tiffany J. Chen,et al.  Cytobank: providing an analytics platform for community cytometry data analysis and collaboration. , 2014, Current topics in microbiology and immunology.