Estimating sampling and analysis uncertainties to assess the fitness for purpose of a water quality monitoring network

In order to verify that the protocols used for water quality monitoring of surface waters within the Long-term Environmental Research Monitoring and Testing System (OPE), located in the north-eastern part of France in relation with a geological disposal for radioactive waste project, are fit for purpose, a validation study was conducted following the methodology described in the Eurachem/citac and Nordtest guidance documents on uncertainty arising from sampling. As one of the objectives of the OPE water monitoring programme was to investigate the spatial and temporal variability of water quality, quality requirements were set to having a measurement variance, including sampling and analytical contributions, less than 20 % of the total variance to minimise the impact of measurement over the observed environmental variability. The replicate method was then selected in order to estimate the measurement uncertainty, including the sampling contribution, as well as the spatial and temporal variability of water quality of surface waters. To minimise costs, a single-split level was selected. Analytical uncertainties were assessed from inter-laboratory data and/or internal quality control data from the last 2–5 years. Finally, ANOVA was applied to the data sets after elimination of outliers. Results showed that for pH, electrical conductivity, turbidity and nitrate, the sampling uncertainty was negligible, whereas for other parameters such as dissolved oxygen, total suspend solids, total organic carbon, nitrite and phosphate, the sampling contribution to the measurement uncertainty was largely significant. For all parameters except calcium, the sampling and analytical protocols were considered fit for purpose.

[1]  Michael Gluschke,et al.  Collaborative sampling trial in the context of quality assurance in the German marine monitoring programme for the North Sea and the Baltic Sea , 2008 .

[2]  H. Muntau,et al.  Estimation of measurement uncertainty by the budget approach for heavy metal content in soils under different land use , 2004 .

[3]  S. Standard GUIDE TO THE EXPRESSION OF UNCERTAINTY IN MEASUREMENT , 2006 .

[4]  M. Ramsey Sampling and analytical quality Control (SAX) for improved error estimation in the measurement of Pb in the environment using robust analysis of variance , 1993 .

[5]  Leonard Steinborn,et al.  International Organization for Standardization ISO/IEC 17025 General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories , 2004 .

[6]  M. Hale,et al.  Objective evaluation of precision requirements for geochemical analysis using robust analysis of variance , 1992 .

[7]  Michael H. Ramsey,et al.  Modifying uncertainty from sampling to achieve fitness for purpose: a case study on nitrate in lettuce , 2007 .

[8]  Michael H. Ramsey,et al.  Quality concepts and practices applied to sampling—an exploratory study , 1995 .

[9]  U. Buczko,et al.  Soil sampling uncertainty on arable fields estimated from reference sampling and a collaborative trial , 2011 .

[10]  M. Ramsey,et al.  Uncertainty of measurement or of mean value for the reliable classification of contaminated land. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[11]  Bertil Magnusson,et al.  Uncertainty from sampling - a nordtest handbook for sampling planners on sampling quality assurance and uncertainty estimation , 2007 .

[12]  P. Minkkinen Practical applications of sampling theory , 2004 .

[13]  A. Argyraki,et al.  Estimation of sampling bias between different sampling protocols on contaminated land , 1995 .

[14]  Nilgun Harmancioǧlu,et al.  Water Quality Monitoring Network Design , 1998 .

[15]  P. Bievre The 2007 International Vocabulary of Metrology (VIM), JCGM 200:2008 [ISO/IEC Guide 99]: Meeting the need for intercontinentally understood concepts and their associated intercontinentally agreed terms. , 2009 .

[16]  Michael H. Ramsey,et al.  Uncertainty from sampling, in the context of fitness for purpose , 2007 .

[17]  N. Guigues,et al.  Combining multivariate statistics and analysis of variance to redesign a water quality monitoring network. , 2013, Environmental science. Processes & impacts.

[18]  Robert G. Garrett,et al.  The determination of sampling and analytical errors in exploration geochemistry , 1969 .

[19]  Teemu Näykki,et al.  NORDTEST HANDBOOK FOR CALCULATION OF MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY BASED ON QUALITY CONTROL AND METHOD VALIDATION , 2007 .

[20]  Robert O Strobl,et al.  Network design for water quality monitoring of surface freshwaters: a review. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[21]  Michael H. Ramsey,et al.  On the collaborative trial in sampling , 1995 .

[22]  T. G. Sanders Design of Networks for Monitoring Water Quality , 1983 .

[23]  J. Namieśnik,et al.  Validation of a sampling procedure , 2013 .

[24]  Michael H. Ramsey,et al.  Sampling as a source of measurement uncertainty: techniques for quantification and comparison with analytical sources , 1998 .

[25]  Michael H. Ramsey,et al.  Proficiency testing in sampling: pilot study on contaminated land , 1995 .

[26]  M. Ramsey,et al.  Inter-organisational sampling trials for the uncertainty estimation of landfill gas measurements. , 2001, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[27]  Pierre Gy,et al.  Sampling for analytical purposes , 1998 .

[28]  Timothy D. Steele Water quality monitoring strategies , 1987 .

[29]  Michael H. Ramsey,et al.  Estimation of measurement uncertainty from field sampling: implications for the classification of contaminated land , 1997 .

[30]  Sabrina Barbizzi,et al.  A practical approach to assessment of sampling uncertainty , 2002 .