Modeling conditions for effective and equitable land use governance in tropical forest frontiers

[1]  E. Lambin,et al.  Deforestation-Free Commodity Supply Chains: Myth or Reality? , 2023, Annual Review of Environment and Resources.

[2]  R. Fischer,et al.  Effectiveness of policy instrument mixes for forest conservation in the tropics – Stakeholder perceptions from Ecuador, the Philippines and Zambia , 2023, Land Use Policy.

[3]  D. Lindoso,et al.  (Falta de) controle do desmatamento na Amazônia brasileira: do fortalecimento ao desmantelamento da autoridade governamental (1999-2020) , 2022, Sustainability in Debate.

[4]  V. Maguire-Rajpaul,et al.  Transforming land use governance: Global targets without equity miss the mark , 2022, Environmental Policy and Governance.

[5]  J. Valentim,et al.  Effectiveness-equity tradeoffs in enforcing exclusionary supply chain policies: Lessons from the Amazonian cattle sector , 2021, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[6]  Jocelyne S. Sze,et al.  Reduced deforestation and degradation in Indigenous Lands pan-tropically , 2021, Nature Sustainability.

[7]  E. Lambin,et al.  Policy sequencing to reduce tropical deforestation , 2021, Global Sustainability.

[8]  D. López‐Carr.  A Review of Small Farmer Land Use and Deforestation in Tropical Forest Frontiers: Implications for Conservation and Sustainable Livelihoods , 2021, Land.

[9]  X. Rueda,et al.  Have food supply chain policies improved forest conservation and rural livelihoods? A systematic review , 2021 .

[10]  E. Lambin,et al.  Jurisdictional approaches to sustainable resource use , 2021, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.

[11]  A. Knight,et al.  Rethinking zero deforestation beyond 2020 to more equitably and effectively conserve tropical forests , 2020 .

[12]  T. Sunderland,et al.  Integrated landscape approaches in the tropics: A brief stock-take , 2020 .

[13]  H. Gibbs,et al.  Brazil’s Amazon Soy Moratorium reduced deforestation , 2020, Nature Food.

[14]  E. Lambin,et al.  Scaling up Solutions for a Sustainability Transition , 2020 .

[15]  Eric F. Lambin,et al.  Scaling up zero-deforestation initiatives through public-private partnerships: A look inside post-conflict Colombia , 2020 .

[16]  Erle C. Ellis,et al.  Importance of Indigenous Peoples’ lands for the conservation of Intact Forest Landscapes , 2020, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.

[17]  A. Manica,et al.  A global-level assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas at resisting anthropogenic pressures , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Transnational corporations and the challenge of biosphere stewardship , 2019, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[19]  N. Harris,et al.  Reducing tropical deforestation , 2019, Science.

[20]  T. Kastner,et al.  Deforestation displaced: trade in forest-risk commodities and the prospects for a global forest transition , 2019, Environmental Research Letters.

[21]  Erle C. Ellis,et al.  Middle-range theories of land system change , 2018, Global Environmental Change.

[22]  M. Hansen,et al.  Classifying drivers of global forest loss , 2018, Science.

[23]  J. Townshend,et al.  Global land change from 1982 to 2016 , 2018, Nature.

[24]  Scott T. Leatherdale,et al.  Natural experiment methodology for research: a review of how different methods can support real-world research , 2018, International Journal of Social Research Methodology.

[25]  Ioannis N. Athanasiadis,et al.  A review of Agent Based Modeling for agricultural policy evaluation , 2018, Agricultural Systems.

[26]  Andrew T. Knight,et al.  Palm oil supply chain complexity impedes implementation of corporate no-deforestation commitments , 2018 .

[27]  Elizabeth A. Law,et al.  How just and just how? A systematic review of social equity in conservation research , 2018 .

[28]  H. Gibbs,et al.  The role of supply-chain initiatives in reducing deforestation , 2018, Nature Climate Change.

[29]  T. Kuemmerle,et al.  Rents, Actors, and the Expansion of Commodity Frontiers in the Gran Chaco , 2018 .

[30]  N. Gross-Camp,et al.  Towards an indicator system to assess equitable management in protected areas , 2017 .

[31]  Leonardo R. Corral,et al.  Titling indigenous communities protects forests in the Peruvian Amazon , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  E. Lambin,et al.  Conditions influencing the adoption of effective anti-deforestation policies in South America’s commodity frontiers , 2017 .

[33]  T. Aide,et al.  Characterizing commercial oil palm expansion in Latin America: land use change and trade , 2017 .

[34]  The impact of swidden decline on livelihoods and ecosystem services in Southeast Asia: A review of the evidence from 1990 to 2015 , 2016, Ambio.

[35]  A. Berardi,et al.  Community owned solutions for fire management in tropical ecosystems: case studies from Indigenous communities of South America , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  P. Richards.  What Drives Indirect Land Use Change? How Brazil's Agriculture Sector Influences Frontier Deforestation , 2015, Annals of the Association of American Geographers. Association of American Geographers.

[37]  Paul F. Steinberg,et al.  Can We Generalize from Case Studies? , 2015, Global Environmental Politics.

[38]  T. Sunderland,et al.  Landscape approaches; what are the pre-conditions for success? , 2015, Sustainability Science.

[39]  E. Lambin,et al.  Effectiveness and synergies of policy instruments for land use governance in tropical regions , 2014 .

[40]  Derek Byerlee,et al.  The Fall and Rise Again of Plantations in Tropical Asia: History Repeated? , 2014 .

[41]  Eric Armijo,et al.  Slowing Amazon deforestation through public policy and interventions in beef and soy supply chains , 2014, Science.

[42]  Liliana B. Andonova.  Boomerangs to Partnerships? Explaining State Participation in Transnational Partnerships for Sustainability , 2014 .

[43]  D. Pannell,et al.  Transaction costs and environmental policy: Taking stock, looking forward , 2013 .

[44]  L. McCann.  Transaction costs and environmental policy design , 2013 .

[45]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Achieving the triple bottom line in the face of inherent trade-offs among social equity, economic return, and conservation , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  Eric F. Lambin,et al.  Global Forest Transition: Prospects for an End to Deforestation , 2011 .

[47]  E. Lambin,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity , 2011 .

[48]  R. DeFries,et al.  Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the twenty-first century , 2010 .

[49]  Gregory P Asner,et al.  Changing Drivers of Deforestation and New Opportunities for Conservation , 2009, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[50]  E. Ostrom.  A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems , 2009, Science.

[51]  D. Carr,et al.  Population and deforestation: why rural migration matters , 2009 .

[52]  C. Brannstrom.  South America's Neoliberal Agricultural Frontiers: Places of Environmental Sacrifice or Conservation Opportunity , 2009, Ambio.

[53]  Jasjeet S. Sekhon,et al.  Opiates for the Matches: Matching Methods for Causal Inference , 2009 .

[54]  Kenneth W. Abbott,et al.  CHAPTER TWO. The Governance Triangle: Regulatory Standards Institutions and the Shadow of the State , 2009 .

[55]  A. Angelsen,et al.  What are the key design issues for REDD and the criteria for assessing options , 2008 .

[56]  B. Cashore,et al.  The New Corporate Social Responsibility , 2008 .

[57]  Thad Dunning,et al.  Improving Causal Inference , 2008 .

[58]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Balancing the criticisms: Validating multi-agent models of social systems , 2008, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[59]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Going beyond panaceas , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[60]  J. Gareth Polhill,et al.  Agent-based land-use models: a review of applications , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[61]  P. Steinberg.  Causal Assessment in Small-N Policy Studies , 2007 .

[62]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Foundations : SESs , Variability , Disturbance , Scale , and HOT , 2007 .

[63]  D. Brockington,et al.  Conservation, Human Rights, and Poverty Reduction , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[64]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Global Consequences of Land Use , 2005, Science.

[65]  Eric F. Lambin,et al.  Forest transitions: towards a global understanding of land use change , 2005 .

[66]  S. Hecht.  Soybeans, Development and Conservation on the Amazon Frontier , 2005 .

[67]  W. Adams,et al.  Biodiversity Conservation and the Eradication of Poverty , 2004, Science.

[68]  M. Janssen,et al.  Multi-Agent Systems for the Simulation of Land-Use and Land-Cover Change: A Review , 2003 .

[69]  B. Turner,et al.  Induced intensification: agricultural change in Bangladesh with implications for Malthus and Boserup. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[70]  E. Lambin,et al.  Agent-Based Simulation of Land Use Governance (ABSOLUG) in Tropical Commodity Frontiers , 2023, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[71]  Jens Hainmueller,et al.  Improving environmental practices in agricultural supply chains: The role of company-led standards , 2018 .

[72]  P. Richards,et al.  Cattle vaccination records question the impact of recent zero-deforestation agreements in the Amazon , 2017, Regional Environmental Change.

[73]  H. Haberl,et al.  Beyond Inputs and Outputs: Opening the Black-Box of Land-Use Intensity , 2016 .

[74]  H. Gibbs,et al.  Did Ranchers and Slaughterhouses Respond to Zero‐Deforestation Agreements in the Brazilian Amazon? , 2016 .

[75]  Δήμητρα Σύρου.  Environmental governance , 2009 .