Ditch communities: a major contributor to floodplain biodiversity

1. Chalk stream floodplains are extensively managed and the high degree of connectivity associated with water meadows has been severely reduced. The main contributor to aquatic biodiversity is perceived to be the river itself. Ditches in these areas have been largely ignored as a contributor to total diversity. 2. Separate surveys of instream, bankside and ditch macroinvertebrates in a small area of floodplain provided a unique opportunity to assess the relative contribution of each locality to total aquatic diversity. The fauna and flora of a ditch on the lower River Frome floodplain was examined and compared with studies of adjacent bankside and instream habitat. A total of 145 macroinvertebrate taxa and 61 plant species were recorded from the ditch. Faunal abundance and richness were positively related to the diversity of aquatic plants. The ditch showed a clear linear trend in community type that appeared to be partly related to the acidic seepage from tertiary deposits at the source and percentage cover of vegetation. 3. There were large differences in the numbers of taxa collected in ditch, bankside, instream mesohabitat and RIVPACS surveys. Of the total 202 taxa recorded in the four surveys, the ditch contributed 59 unique taxa with 25 from the bankside and two and three from the mesohabitat and RIVPACS surveys, respectively. 4. The large contribution of the Rushton Ditch to aquatic biodiversity on the floodplain is due to three main factors: the chemically different and slow-flowing environment, the connection to the main river, and a management regime which has halted hydroseral succession at a point where vegetation structure is for the most part open and able to support a wide range of ecological niches. The maintenance of these conditions requires sensitive management and further knowledge of the needs and interactions of faunal communities with vegetation. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  W. Twisk,et al.  Effects of ditch management on caddisfly, dragonfly and amphibian larvae in intensively farmed peat areas , 2000, Aquatic Ecology.

[2]  P. Armitage,et al.  Temporal constancy of faunal assemblages in 'mesohabitats' ― application to management? , 1995 .

[3]  C. Stace,et al.  New Flora Of The British Isles , 1998 .

[4]  R. Edwards,et al.  The macroinvertebrate fauna of the drainage channels of the Gwent Levels, South Wales , 1983 .

[5]  J. Stanford,et al.  The serial discontinuity concept : extending the model to floodplain rivers , 1995 .

[6]  M. O. Hill,et al.  DECORANA - A FORTRAN program for detrended correspondence analysis and reciprocal averaging. , 1979 .

[7]  G. Pautou,et al.  A method for applied ecological studies of fluvial hydrosystems , 1987 .

[8]  Duncan Painter.  Effects of ditch management patterns on Odonata at Wicken Fen, Cambridgeshire, UK , 1998 .

[9]  P. Armitage,et al.  The influence of catchment geology on the longitudinal distribution of macroinvertebrate assemblages in a groundwater dominated river , 1999 .

[10]  G. Minshall,et al.  The River Continuum Concept , 1980 .

[11]  B. Beltman,et al.  Distribution of macro‐invertebrates in a ditch in relation to the vegetation , 1984 .

[12]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  CANOCO Reference Manual and User's Guide to Canoco for Windows: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (Version 4) , 1998 .

[13]  P. Armitage,et al.  BANK PROFILE AND STRUCTURE AS DETERMINANTS OF MACROINVERTEBRATE ASSEMBLAGES —SEASONAL CHANGES AND MANAGEMENT , 2001 .

[14]  D. Bilton,et al.  Classification of water beetle assemblages in arable fenland and ranking of sites in relation to conservation value , 1989 .

[15]  Duncan Painter.  Fen ditch excavation patterns : effects on aquatic communities , 1996 .

[16]  R. Mann.  The Numbers and Production of Pike (Esox lucius) in Two Dorset Rivers , 1980 .

[17]  Duncan Painter,et al.  Macroinvertebrate distributions and the conservation value of aquatic Coleoptera, Mollusca and Odonata in the ditches of traditionally managed and grazing fen at Wicken Fen, UK , 1999 .

[18]  C. Frissell,et al.  A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: Viewing streams in a watershed context , 1986 .

[19]  D. Debinski,et al.  Species diversity and the scale of the landscape mosaic : do scales of movement and patch size affect diversity , 2001 .

[20]  P. Verdonschot,et al.  Macroinvertebrates in the Demmerik ditches (The Netherlands): The role of environmental structure , 1989, Hydrobiological Bulletin.

[21]  M. O. Hill,et al.  TWINSPAN: a FORTRAN program of arranging multivariate data in an ordered two way table by classification of individual and attributes , 1979 .

[22]  P. Verdonschot,et al.  Macroinvertebrates in Dutch ditches: A typological characterization and the status of the Demmerik ditches , 1989, Hydrobiological Bulletin.

[23]  Peter Calow,et al.  River conservation and management , 1992 .