On the Effects of Active Learning Environments in Computing Education

This replication study aims at both quantifying the effects of active learning classrooms in introductory programming courses (CS1) and overcoming some design and methodological limits of prior studies on this topic. 156 students enrolled in three different sections of the same CS1 participated in this study. The three sections differed from each other either in terms of learning pedagogies (conventional lecture vs. peer instruction) or physical learning environments (lecture hall vs. active learning classroom). This study did not replicate the findings of prior studies on this topic. Instead, this study found that when learning pedagogies were controlled, learning environments did not have significant influences on student performance. On the other hand, learning pedagogies were found to have significant influences on student performance. When peer instruction is conducted other than conventional lecturing, students tended to have significantly better performance. Such findings highlight the importance of active learning in computing education, and the feasibility of conducting active learning in CS1 despite of physical environment constraints. Additionally, such findings emphasize the necessity of replication studies on the topic of active learning environments, and invite debates on the investment decisions in active learning classrooms.

[1]  Beth Simon,et al.  Halving fail rates using peer instruction: a study of four computer science courses , 2013, SIGCSE '13.

[2]  Quintin I. Cutts,et al.  Experience report: peer instruction in introductory computing , 2010, SIGCSE.

[3]  Diane Ebert-May,et al.  Innovation in large lectures—teaching for active learning , 1997 .

[4]  J. D. Walker,et al.  "It's Not You, It's the Room"-Are the High-Tech, Active Learning Classrooms Worth It? , 2013 .

[5]  Qiang Hao,et al.  Effects of Active Learning Environments and Instructional Methods in Computer Science Education , 2018, SIGCSE.

[6]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  How Does Technology-Enabled Active Learning Affect Undergraduate Students' Understanding of Electromagnetism Concepts? , 2005 .

[7]  Maria T. Oliver-Hoyo,et al.  Effects of an Active Learning Environment: Teaching Innovations at a Research I Institution , 2004 .

[8]  Thomas C. Pentecost,et al.  Research and Teaching. From Verification to Guided Inquiry: What Happens When a Chemistry Laboratory Curriculum Changes?. , 2013 .

[9]  Robert McCartney,et al.  A Multi-institutional Study of Peer Instruction in Introductory Computing , 2016, SIGCSE.

[10]  Daniel Zingaro,et al.  Peer Instruction in computing: The value of instructor intervention , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[11]  Michèle Shuster,et al.  Introductory biology course reform: A tale of two courses , 2014 .

[12]  Beth Simon,et al.  Retaining nearly one-third more majors with a trio of instructional best practices in CS1 , 2013, SIGCSE '13.

[13]  Raman Adaikkalavan,et al.  Successful implementation of an active learning laboratory in computer science , 2011, SIGUCCS '11.

[14]  B. Timmerman,et al.  Assessment of active learning with upper division computer science students , 2003, 33rd Annual Frontiers in Education, 2003. FIE 2003..

[15]  William G. Griswold,et al.  Impact of Class Size on Student Evaluations for Traditional and Peer Instruction Classrooms , 2017, SIGCSE.

[16]  E. L. Park,et al.  Transformation of classroom spaces: traditional versus active learning classroom in colleges , 2014 .

[17]  D. Christopher Brooks,et al.  Making the Case for Space: Three Years of Empirical Research on Learning Environments , 2010 .

[18]  Robert J. Beichner The Student-Centered Active Learning Environment for Undergraduate Programs (SCALE-UP) Project , 2011 .

[19]  T. Beery,et al.  The impact of learning space on teaching behaviors. , 2013, Nurse education in practice.

[20]  Qiang Hao Online help seeking in computer science education , 2017 .

[21]  Cynthia Taylor,et al.  Peer instruction in computer science at small liberal arts colleges , 2013, ITiCSE '13.

[22]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  Educational Reform at MIT: Advancing and Evaluating Technology-Based Projects On- and Off-Campus , 2007 .

[23]  E. Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results , 2001 .

[24]  Beth Simon,et al.  Peer instruction: do students really learn from peer discussion in computing? , 2011, ICER.

[25]  D. Nicol,et al.  Peer Instruction versus Class-wide Discussion in Large Classes: A comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom , 2003 .

[26]  D. Christopher Brooks,et al.  Space matters: The impact of formal learning environments on student learning , 2011, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[27]  Jon D. H. Gaffney,et al.  Promoting Active Learning in Technology-Infused TILE Classrooms at the University of Iowa , 2012 .

[28]  J. D. Walker,et al.  It's not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[29]  Robert J. Beichner,et al.  Scaling up Education Reform. , 2008 .

[30]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[31]  Cynthia Bailey Lee,et al.  Can peer instruction be effective in upper-division computer science courses? , 2013, TOCE.

[32]  Deborah Allen,et al.  Infusing active learning into the large-enrollment biology class: seven strategies, from the simple to complex. , 2005, Cell biology education.