Fundus imaging in patients with cataract: role for a variable wavelength scanning laser ophthalmoscope.

AIMS--An investigation was carried out to compare the image quality of the ocular fundus obtained clinically, photographically, and with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO) at visible and infrared wavelengths in patients with significant cataract. METHODS--Nineteen patients admitted for routine cataract extraction were examined clinically by two independent observers to ascertain cataract type and clarity of fundus view with an indirect ophthalmoscope. Fundus photography and both confocal and direct (non-confocal) SLO imaging at 590 nm, 670 nm, and 830 nm were carried out after pupillary dilatation. Images obtained were graded independently using a recognised grading system. RESULTS--Quality of SLO images appeared to be superior to indirect ophthalmoscopy (p < 0.01) and fundus photography (p < 0.001) when graded subjectively. Quantitative analysis of contrast of retinal vessels demonstrated significantly higher contrast for the SLO compared with digitised fundus photographs at all wavelengths tested (p < 0.001), with highest contrast at 590 nm. Use of a confocal aperture significantly improved vessel contrast but may reduce overall image intensity. CONCLUSIONS--Scanning laser ophthalmoscopy may offer a method to observe and record fine fundus detail in patients who have marked cataract.

[1]  M. Reim,et al.  Measurement of retinal hemodynamics with scanning laser ophthalmoscopy: reference values and variation. , 1994, Survey of ophthalmology.

[2]  J. Mellerio,et al.  Yellowing of the human lens: Nuclear and cortical contributions , 1987, Vision Research.

[3]  M Intaglietta,et al.  Confocal laser tomographic analysis of the retina in eyes with macular hole formation and other focal macular diseases. , 1989, American journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  P F Sharp,et al.  Digital fundus imaging using a scanning laser ophthalmoscope. , 1993, Physiological measurement.

[5]  R. Webb,et al.  Confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope. , 1987, Applied optics.

[6]  J S Werner,et al.  Development of scotopic sensitivity and the absorption spectrum of the human ocular media. , 1982, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[7]  Y. Ogura,et al.  Evaluation of an objective method for the in vivo measurement of changes in light transmittance of the human crystalline lens. , 1987, Experimental eye research.

[8]  L T Chylack,et al.  Lens opacities classification system II (LOCS II) , 1989, Archives of ophthalmology.

[9]  P F Sharp,et al.  Quantitative image analysis of macular drusen from fundus photographs and scanning laser ophthalmoscope images , 1995, Eye.

[10]  R. Nussenblatt,et al.  Standardization of vitreal inflammatory activity in intermediate and posterior uveitis. , 1985, Ophthalmology.

[11]  R A Weale,et al.  Human lenticular fluorescence and transmissivity, and their effects on vision. , 1985, Experimental eye research.

[12]  P. Sharp,et al.  Performance measurements of an infrared digital scanning laser ophthalmoscope. , 1994, Physiological measurement.

[13]  O. Lund,et al.  Fluorescein and indocyanine green angiographies of central serous choroidopathy by scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. , 1993, American journal of ophthalmology.

[14]  P F Sharp,et al.  Clinical investigation of an infrared digital scanning laser ophthalmoscope. , 1994, The British journal of ophthalmology.